Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag.

And you cult members claimed you wanted a civil discussion.
We aren't cult members. But, Democrats are because they claim they are righteous people and everyone else is "EVIL." It's a form of brainwashing that causes the mentally imbalanced to act out thinking they are doing God's work killing innocent people. Republicans do not call others evil because of their ideologies. We will call you stupid and nuttier than a fruitcake. But, we won't call you evil.
 
So it's all right for Kirk supporters, but not Floyd's?
It's alright for anyone, this is still a free country.

The supporters of the drug-addled career criminal have as much right as anyone to call Charlie Kirk a scumbag for not wanting children to be surgically and hormonally altered to better please trannie-chasers when they grow up.
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

Ugh did Kirk once hold a gun to a pregnant ladies stomach? Did Kirk sell drugs?

Also try to be a bit more nuanced here which is something the radical left fails at. I’m sure plenty of Kirk supporters disagreed with his position on George Floyd
 
Last edited:
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

Floyd was a scumbag--but he didn't deserve to die. It is a shame that he lacked the control to abstain from a fatal dose of fentanyl. Try again.
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

floyd was a drug addict criminal that pointed a gun at a pregnant womens belly during an armed robbery,,

kirk had a different opinion and wanted to talk about it,,

not sure scumbag means what you think it means,,
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

That's because he was a scumbag. Look at his rap sheet.

Sheesh, you assholes are desperate.
 
15th post
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

Simple answer to your question:

Kirk was doing absolutely nothing wrong.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom