Kinda feels like the wheels have come off.

As I mentioned in the OP, not just unqualified. Statutorily prevented from taking the position.

AI overview......

By statute, any individual nominated for the position of Director of National Intelligence (DNI) must have extensive national security expertise. [1]
Statutory Details & Roles:

  • Legal Requirement: Title 50, Section 3023 of the U.S. Code explicitly mandates that nominees for the DNI post possess extensive national security expertise to ensure the head of the Intelligence Community can properly advise the President. [1, 2]
  • Senate Confirmation: A permanent, Senate-confirmed DNI must be approved by the chamber, which reviews the nominee's background for this requirement.
What part of Securities and Exchange Commission did you miss?
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

If the Senate determines he is not qualified, they simply can disapprove his nomination. That's the way things work in the real world.
 
Yet another grossly unqualified Trump lapdog...



I'd say I'm surprised, but...
FB_IMG_1780328837212.webp
i guess, I need to remind you. Of the representatives of your party. Oh, and your party just elected a Nazi to represent your party. No credibility left.
 
Your question is like asking who has the authority to determine if 2+2=4.
No, there is actually a Constitutional process which legally gives the United States, not you, the authority to determine if someone is qualified. There is no Constitutional process involving simple Math.

The Constitution matters to America. You don't. Moron.

Lol
 
Back
Top Bottom