Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You ‘Locally Owe Allegiance’ in Bizarre Birthright Citiz

[80zephyr]

Talk about doubling down on stupid. And the GatePundit, Hoft at that? Dude, you might as well proudly wear a flipping dunce hat everywhere you go.

If Brown steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest her? Of course they can, unless she is a foreign diplomat. Therefore, she is under jurisdiction of Japan. And when you flip it around, it gets better. If a Japanese citizen steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest that Japanese citizen if they are on US soil, say visiting Disneyland? Uh no, they would have to extradite them because, wait for it, the US has jurisdiction.

From the stupid OP article,

Allegiance is a bond of loyalty to a nation; it is the commitment to defend its laws and its borders.

The hell you say? How damn stupid can you get. Jurisdiction requires allegiance? Well damn, I am strapping on my gun belt and heading for the damn bank. I have no allegiance to the US, therefore, they have no jurisdiction over me. This is some Sovereign Citizen movement bullshit and you are a fool for falling for it.

Talk about stupid. Does enforcing the law in Japan make one a citizen of Japan?

 

[Hollie]

For the love of all that is holy.

1. If Jackson steals a wallet, while visiting Japan, for whatever damn reason, can Japan arrest her, charge her, and try her? And screw Japan, make it China. Hell, Afghanistan if you want, Taliban got her, she wasn't wearing a Burka, or whatever. Who has jurisdiction in each of these cases? I mean damn, if tourist are not under the jurisdiction of the countries they are in, then why would we warn people visiting Saudi Arabia or Dubai? Why even bother to follow their laws and their customs. They have no "jurisdiction".

2. Flip it around, as Sotamayer did. Can Japan come to the United States and arrest a Japanese citizen, on US soil, for a crime committed in Japan? Hell no, they can't even arrest them in the US embassy IN Japan. And the reverse works the same.

Look, I don't know how those on the right do it. I mean it makes my head hurt. The absolute cognitive dissonance, and that is on the slight chance they even halfway understand. For instance, within the last 48 hours we have heard about some Homeland Security big wheel that likes to go to Colombia and Thailand for sex vacations with hookers. Openly brags about it to the point that it is sexual harassment. But hey, no problem those on the right say.

See, prostitution is legal in Colombia and Thailand. Those countries had, wait for it, JURISDICTION, so no big deal. And those on the right can post that in that thread, and then post the exact opposite in this thread, and not skip a damn beat.

You went from stolen wallets in Japan to prostitution in Cambodia and Thailand. Did a hooker in Cambodia steal your wallet?

Let this be a lesson to you. Keep your wallet safe from Cambodian hookers.

 

[WEATHER53]

We are seeing an object lesson in why DIE is a disservice to thinking humans. The USSC oral arguments on the absurdity of birthright citizenship allowed the USSC DIE hire, Brown, to positively identify the reasons why DIE is a policy that rewards incompetence

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You 'Locally Owe Allegiance' in Bizarre Birthright Citizenship Argument | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

During oral arguments in the landmark case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, Jackson attempted to redefine the concept of “allegiance” under the 14th Amendment, using a hypothetical crime committed abroad.

That is a drug addled comment by her

 

[Muhammed]

She has feelings of guilt for stealing wallets.

She does resemble the toothy four eyed microcephalic skag who tried to steal my wallet at a Billy Squire concert.

 

[IM2]

These racists look for anything to jump on Jackson about.

 

[Concerned American]

There have to have been dozens of more qualified Black Female lawyers to become a SC justice.

That's exactly why she was chosen. She is incapable of making INFORMED decisions. She is just another word-salad junkie like Heels Up.

 

[Hollie]

It just gets worse.

Justice Jackson Suggests Foreign Tourists Qualify for Birthright Citizenship Because They Have ‘Local Allegiance’ to U.S. While on Vacation​

Justice Jackson Suggests Foreign Tourists Qualify for Birthright Citizenship Because They Have 'Local Allegiance' to U.S. While on Vacation

Justice Jackson made her case for why the children of tourists ought to qualify for birthright U.S. citizenship if they are born in the U.S.

www.breitbart.com

 

[IM2]

That's exactly why she was chosen. She is incapable of making INFORMED decisions. She is just another word-salad junkie like Heels Up.

And here is another racist chiming in.

If you want to hear word salad, it will be on in prime time tonight.

 

[Hollie]

And here is another racist chiming in.

If you want to hear word salad, it will be on in prime time tonight.

All criticism is racist™, eh.

 

[Rawley]

We are seeing an object lesson in why DIE is a disservice to thinking humans. The USSC oral arguments on the absurdity of birthright citizenship allowed the USSC DIE hire, Brown, to positively identify the reasons why DIE is a policy that rewards incompetence

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You 'Locally Owe Allegiance' in Bizarre Birthright Citizenship Argument | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

During oral arguments in the landmark case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, Jackson attempted to redefine the concept of “allegiance” under the 14th Amendment, using a hypothetical crime committed abroad.

That was very strange.

 

[MisterBeale]

All criticism is racist™, eh.

 

[Winston]

That was, you know, a complete misrepresentation of you know, the core argument. Did you report your stolen wallet to the Ketanji Brown police? I’m not sure what the area code is for Japan but email Jackson for the number.

You want the argument.

Citizenship, granted at birth, is dependent on the status of the parent.

That is a complete change from English common law for five hundred years. Part of the eloquence of Jus Solis is the simplicity. We change that, birth becomes a nightmare of Brave New World proportion.

That citizenship status is based on allegiance, and jurisdiction is based on allegiance.

There is a lot going on with that, much more than you can imagine. But in the end, it divides this country by creating a whole new class of individuals, with limited rights and no representation. Kind of a kick in the face to the slave owning founders.

Domiciled is of the upmost importance.

This one really cracked me up. Roberts was playing with government counsel, it was kind of sad and a little embarrassing. Fool didn't even notice. But Robert's asked him, "domiciled" under the 19th century definition or under the modern definition. I am driving, hinged for the response. Counsel responds 19th century but said he didn't see much of a difference. Man, I about crash the car I am laughing so hard. Images of a door and frame on a trailer hauled behind a horse. That was domiciled. Homesteaders rented the thing to claim their land.

Like damn near everything, no one in the Trump administration thought this through. There is no workability here. Start at birth. Parents have to show up with papers, but damn, who are the parents. Sure, you would think the mother would be easy, but is it? What about surrogate mother's? And we already know, the father part is going to be a nightmare. Are we going to require paternity tests?

And what papers are sufficient? Can't be a birth certificate, does it show parent's citizenship status? A passport is probably the only way to go and who doesn't have a passport? It is easy to see where all this is going.

 

[Winston]

Talk about stupid. Does enforcing the law in Japan make one a citizen of Japan?

What the hell does that have to do with anything? We are not talking about "that person", we are talking about a child born to that person. Do try to keep up.

 

[Concerned American]

View attachment 1238138

I'm glad Crockett is a has-been (should be never-was). That's another racist piece of garbage that was elevated far beyond anywhere she deserved by her skin color.

 

[SweetTea]

It just gets worse.

Justice Jackson Suggests Foreign Tourists Qualify for Birthright Citizenship Because They Have ‘Local Allegiance’ to U.S. While on Vacation​

Justice Jackson Suggests Foreign Tourists Qualify for Birthright Citizenship Because They Have 'Local Allegiance' to U.S. While on Vacation

Justice Jackson made her case for why the children of tourists ought to qualify for birthright U.S. citizenship if they are born in the U.S.

www.breitbart.com

Other countries sure don't see citizenship this way. I wonder why? Maybe because they don't have so many brain dead liberals with absolutely zero common sense.

 

[Hollie]

You want the argument.

Citizenship, granted at birth, is dependent on the status of the parent.

That is a complete change from English common law for five hundred years. Part of the eloquence of Jus Solis is the simplicity. We change that, birth becomes a nightmare of Brave New World proportion.

That citizenship status is based on allegiance, and jurisdiction is based on allegiance.

There is a lot going on with that, much more than you can imagine. But in the end, it divides this country by creating a whole new class of individuals, with limited rights and no representation. Kind of a kick in the face to the slave owning founders.

Domiciled is of the upmost importance.

This one really cracked me up. Roberts was playing with government counsel, it was kind of sad and a little embarrassing. Fool didn't even notice. But Robert's asked him, "domiciled" under the 19th century definition or under the modern definition. I am driving, hinged for the response. Counsel responds 19th century but said he didn't see much of a difference. Man, I about crash the car I am laughing so hard. Images of a door and frame on a trailer hauled behind a horse. That was domiciled. Homesteaders rented the thing to claim their land.

Like damn near everything, no one in the Trump administration thought this through. There is no workability here. Start at birth. Parents have to show up with papers, but damn, who are the parents. Sure, you would think the mother would be easy, but is it? What about surrogate mother's? And we already know, the father part is going to be a nightmare. Are we going to require paternity tests?

And what papers are sufficient? Can't be a birth certificate, does it show parent's citizenship status? A passport is probably the only way to go and who doesn't have a passport? It is easy to see where all this is going.

I would, you know, want a description from, you know, someone who hasn’t lost a wallet to a Cambodian hooker.

Do you frequent the lady boys or the female prostitutes?

 

[struth]

And here is another racist chiming in.

If you want to hear word salad, it will be on in prime time tonight.

Look at this white boy pretending to be black

Calling others racist

 

[Concerned American]

What about surrogate mother's?

What about the man in the moon. SMH. State of jurisdiction is that jurisdiction that the parents of a child are subject to. Nothing else is relevant.

 

[struth]

What the hell does that have to do with anything? We are not talking about "that person", we are talking about a child born to that person. Do try to keep up.

Yes, and it’s sad

It’s sad we are still talking about kids born from people dems exploited

 

[Hollie]

Does anyone know if Japan will grant me citizenship if I travel there to steal wallets?