Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You ‘Locally Owe Allegiance’ in Bizarre Birthright Citiz

What the hell does that have to do with anything? We are not talking about "that person", we are talking about a child born to that person. Do try to keep up.
Birth tourism and illegals seeking to exploit the US is the issue.

Because you can’t keep up, go steal wallets.
 
You went from stolen wallets in Japan to prostitution in Cambodia and Thailand. Did a hooker in Cambodia steal your wallet?

Let this be a lesson to you. Keep your wallet safe from Cambodian hookers.
Look, let me give you a gimpse of this bizzaro world Trump and this EO envisions.

First, yes, we could arrest that Homeland security guy for engaging in prostitution. Yes, we can claim jurisdiction. I mean this shit is damn comical. Again, we forget "Barbara", the damn Plantiff. The argument here is that Barbara has "allegiance" to Honduras. Barbara is under the jurisdiction of Honduras.

%&)Q)QT% t0y70qr %*@)&)@%^, BARBARA FLED HONDURAS IN FEAR OF HER LIFE.

I mean get that shit out of here. Get that shit out of my court. What the hell are you thinking?
 
We are seeing an object lesson in why DIE is a disservice to thinking humans. The USSC oral arguments on the absurdity of birthright citizenship allowed the USSC DIE hire, Brown, to positively identify the reasons why DIE is a policy that rewards incompetence


Far-Left Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

During oral arguments in the landmark case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, Jackson attempted to redefine the concept of “allegiance” under the 14th Amendment, using a hypothetical crime committed abroad.
.

That's one big ball of pure ignorant.

.
 
Talk about doubling down on stupid. And the GatePundit, Hoft at that? Dude, you might as well proudly wear a flipping dunce hat everywhere you go.

If Brown steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest her? Of course they can, unless she is a foreign diplomat. Therefore, she is under jurisdiction of Japan. And when you flip it around, it gets better. If a Japanese citizen steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest that Japanese citizen if they are on US soil, say visiting Disneyland? Uh no, they would have to extradite them because, wait for it, the US has jurisdiction.

From the stupid OP article,

Allegiance is a bond of loyalty to a nation; it is the commitment to defend its laws and its borders.

The hell you say? How damn stupid can you get. Jurisdiction requires allegiance? Well damn, I am strapping on my gun belt and heading for the damn bank. I have no allegiance to the US, therefore, they have no jurisdiction over me. This is some Sovereign Citizen movement bullshit and you are a fool for falling for it.
I see you’re desperate to make excuses for the absurdity of the nonsense babbling from Jackson. Aside from the linked source, your pointless screeching about the Gateway Pundit was drenched in your crocodile tears.
 
Talk about doubling down on stupid. And the GatePundit, Hoft at that? Dude, you might as well proudly wear a flipping dunce hat everywhere you go.

If Brown steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest her? Of course they can, unless she is a foreign diplomat. Therefore, she is under jurisdiction of Japan. And when you flip it around, it gets better. If a Japanese citizen steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest that Japanese citizen if they are on US soil, say visiting Disneyland? Uh no, they would have to extradite them because, wait for it, the US has jurisdiction.

From the stupid OP article,

Allegiance is a bond of loyalty to a nation; it is the commitment to defend its laws and its borders.

The hell you say? How damn stupid can you get. Jurisdiction requires allegiance? Well damn, I am strapping on my gun belt and heading for the damn bank. I have no allegiance to the US, therefore, they have no jurisdiction over me. This is some Sovereign Citizen movement bullshit and you are a fool for falling for it.
Brown doesn't understand that when they used the phrase "under the jurisdiction" in 1868, they meant that the person was the citizen of a foreign country, not an American citizen.
 
For the love of all that is holy.

1. If Jackson steals a wallet, while visiting Japan, for whatever damn reason, can Japan arrest her, charge her, and try her? And screw Japan, make it China. Hell, Afghanistan if you want, Taliban got her, she wasn't wearing a Burka, or whatever. Who has jurisdiction in each of these cases? I mean damn, if tourist are not under the jurisdiction of the countries they are in, then why would we warn people visiting Saudi Arabia or Dubai? Why even bother to follow their laws and their customs. They have no "jurisdiction".

2. Flip it around, as Sotamayer did. Can Japan come to the United States and arrest a Japanese citizen, on US soil, for a crime committed in Japan? Hell no, they can't even arrest them in the US embassy IN Japan. And the reverse works the same.

Look, I don't know how those on the right do it. I mean it makes my head hurt. The absolute cognitive dissonance, and that is on the slight chance they even halfway understand. For instance, within the last 48 hours we have heard about some Homeland Security big wheel that likes to go to Colombia and Thailand for sex vacations with hookers. Openly brags about it to the point that it is sexual harassment. But hey, no problem those on the right say.

See, prostitution is legal in Colombia and Thailand. Those countries had, wait for it, JURISDICTION, so no big deal. And those on the right can post that in that thread, and then post the exact opposite in this thread, and not skip a damn beat.
“Screw Japan”? Wow darlin’ you’re goin’ full racist™ on us.
 
Talk about doubling down on stupid. And the GatePundit, Hoft at that? Dude, you might as well proudly wear a flipping dunce hat everywhere you go.

If Brown steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest her? Of course they can, unless she is a foreign diplomat. Therefore, she is under jurisdiction of Japan. And when you flip it around, it gets better. If a Japanese citizen steals a wallet in Japan, can Japan arrest that Japanese citizen if they are on US soil, say visiting Disneyland? Uh no, they would have to extradite them because, wait for it, the US has jurisdiction.

From the stupid OP article,

Allegiance is a bond of loyalty to a nation; it is the commitment to defend its laws and its borders.

The hell you say? How damn stupid can you get. Jurisdiction requires allegiance? Well damn, I am strapping on my gun belt and heading for the damn bank. I have no allegiance to the US, therefore, they have no jurisdiction over me. This is some Sovereign Citizen movement bullshit and you are a fool for falling for it.
Every other Justice sees her as an idiot.

Even Kagan

But to you she is a genius
Okay.
 
Look, let me give you a gimpse of this bizzaro world Trump and this EO envisions.

First, yes, we could arrest that Homeland security guy for engaging in prostitution. Yes, we can claim jurisdiction. I mean this shit is damn comical. Again, we forget "Barbara", the damn Plantiff. The argument here is that Barbara has "allegiance" to Honduras. Barbara is under the jurisdiction of Honduras.

%&)Q)QT% t0y70qr %*@)&)@%^, BARBARA FLED HONDURAS IN FEAR OF HER LIFE.

I mean get that shit out of here. Get that shit out of my court. What the hell are you thinking?
Illegals were coached by various NGO’s on terms and phrases to use when trying to Lie their way in to the US.
 
We are seeing an object lesson in why DIE is a disservice to thinking humans. The USSC oral arguments on the absurdity of birthright citizenship allowed the USSC DIE hire, Brown, to positively identify the reasons why DIE is a policy that rewards incompetence


Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson left many Americans scratching their heads after offering a bizarre analogy involving… stealing a wallet in Japan.

During oral arguments in the landmark case tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, Jackson attempted to redefine the concept of “allegiance” under the 14th Amendment, using a hypothetical crime committed abroad.
Brown is biggest embarrassment of all time on that court. She asks stupid questions, writes opinions like a jr. high student, and makes inexplicably dumb votes. She's woefully unqualified for the court, but the Vegetable put her in there because she the most extreme Marxist they could put in. And a DEI appointment. They call her 'Miss 8 to 1', because she has so many lone dissents. The forum's blacks can't possibly think she's competent...... Can they?
 
Birth tourism and illegals seeking to exploit the US is the issue.

Because you can’t keep up, go steal wallets.
Look, I understand the argument. Tell me if I am wrong. These brown people, they are coming over here, spitting out babies that are citizens, because one day, they are taking us the hell over for their great and almighty leaders back in there so advanced countries like Mexico, Honduras, Columbia, and oh shit, Venezuela.

And the birth tourism, it is the same. I guess they got some coordination signal. At some point, they are coordinating, Chinese, Russian, Mexicans, they going to carve us all up and run back to the Motherland. Leave behind a desert. That about sum it up?
 
15th post
What the hell does that have to do with anything? We are not talking about "that person", we are talking about a child born to that person. Do try to keep up.
That is it in a nutshell.

She is arguing that being subject to a jurisdiction automatically makes a person "allegiant," to that jurisdiction.

By this logic, slaves are allegiant to their masters. Prisoners support their imprisonment once found guilty.

It is asinine.
 
What about the man in the moon. SMH. State of jurisdiction is that jurisdiction that the parents of a child are subject to. Nothing else is relevant.
Again, the Plantiff in this case has legal asylum status fleeing Honduras. Do you really want to make the argument that she is under Honduran jurisdiction? That is in violation of international treaties and yet that is the argument the government is attempting to make.
 
Because you can’t keep up, go steal wallets.
ao6vzl.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom