Kerry vs Kadyrov who would you want at your back?

[tinydancer]

I don't understand this bromance with men and Obama. To me he's all nancy boy and not a world leader.

But let's play "I'm the leader". Do you want John Kerry? Or Kadyrov? Who do you want at your back?

"If Russia’s Supreme Commander-in-Chief Vladimir Putin issues an order, we are ready already tomorrow to send world-class specialists who have no equal in the West.

We have the experience and knowledge," Kadyrov wrote on his page in a social network, according to Tass. “I’m convinced that the evil ISIS should be eliminated in its lair. We cannot wait until they come to our towns and villages.”

Russia Airstrikes In Syria: Chechen Leader Ramzan Kadyrov Commits Troops To Fight Islamic State Group On The Ground

I'm running with Ramz baby!

 

[S.J.]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

 

[S.J.]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

You torture and murder people?

 

[FA_Q2]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

On the word stage (and particularly in the nations where the question actually matters) your point is irrelevant. What matters is who will actually deliver on promises and who will not.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

On the word stage (and particularly in the nations where the question actually matters) your point is irrelevant. What matters is who will actually deliver on promises and who will not.

You mean like how Mussolini made the trains run on time?

Hitler delivered on many of his "promises", too.

 

[Kosh]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

On the word stage (and particularly in the nations where the question actually matters) your point is irrelevant. What matters is who will actually deliver on promises and who will not.

You mean like how Mussolini made the trains run on time?

Hitler delivered on many of his "promises", too.

And that is why you admire him so much!

 

[BluesLegend]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

Holy shit you destroyed Kerry with that last point.

 

[FA_Q2]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

On the word stage (and particularly in the nations where the question actually matters) your point is irrelevant. What matters is who will actually deliver on promises and who will not.

You mean like how Mussolini made the trains run on time?

Hitler delivered on many of his "promises", too.

And you bring up this false equivalency because...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

On the word stage (and particularly in the nations where the question actually matters) your point is irrelevant. What matters is who will actually deliver on promises and who will not.

You mean like how Mussolini made the trains run on time?

Hitler delivered on many of his "promises", too.

And you bring up this false equivalency because...

What makes it a "false equivalency", exactly?

You made the claim that all that matters is who will "deliver on promises". I don't accept that premise.

 

[FA_Q2]

Well, I think I'd go with the one who doesn't torture and murder those who disagree with him.

But that's just me.

On the word stage (and particularly in the nations where the question actually matters) your point is irrelevant. What matters is who will actually deliver on promises and who will not.

You mean like how Mussolini made the trains run on time?

Hitler delivered on many of his "promises", too.

And you bring up this false equivalency because...

What makes it a "false equivalency", exactly?

You made the claim that all that matters is who will "deliver on promises". I don't accept that premise.

Because you took the world stage away and changed it to things like trains running on time.

The US has made deals and ties with many maniacal and terrible dictatorships because we needed cooperation that we could count on. Recently, we disposed of one of those relationships and that has become an adjunct disaster. How you equivalate what I said with Hitler and Mussolini is not simply being obtuse but purposefully so.

 

[nuhuh]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

 

[mamooth]

The Pope sought out Kerry to shake his hand. Kerry wins, hands down, in a runaway.

Torture-lovers will disagree, obviously, as their love of torture overrides all other factors.

 

[S.J.]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

Yeah, and I flew on the space shuttle.

 

[nuhuh]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

Yeah, and I flew on the space shuttle.

Yeah and you got there with the help of your little fairy wings.

 

[S.J.]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

Yeah, and I flew on the space shuttle.

Yeah and you got there with the help of your little fairy wings.

Don't give up your day job at the Dept. of Sanitation.

 

[tinydancer]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

Like hell you did. And this is a throw down. Put it up. Or shut up.

 

[nuhuh]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

Like hell you did. And this is a throw down. Put it up. Or shut up.

Okay what do you want to see?

 

[Zander]

Nobody in their right mind would want Kerry watching their back. Just ask our Vietnam vets.

I'm a Vietnam vet who served in the Mekong Delta and I would have been proud to have John Kerry watching my back.

Really? From reading your posts I assumed you were a teenager.....

 

[tinydancer]

You know. This takes a lot out of me but with so many pretenders out there there has to be a way to ask people if they are real or they are not. Especially servicemen and women.

There's just so many fakers. I really don't know what to do in a Kardashian world. I really don't.