Kerry Set To Sign 'Gun-Grabbing' UN Treaty...

[paulitician]

Welcome to the NWO. Most 'American' Politicians no longer represent American Citizens. These days, they seem to represent everyone but American Citizens. They're doing everything in their power to destroy our Constitutional Sovereignty. We now have a rogue criminal Government. But hopefully, some brave American Heroes will stand up and oppose this farce. I guess we'll see.


Secretary of State John Kerry will sign the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on Wednesday, the State Department confirmed, setting up a Senate showdown over an international agreement many in Congress believe would usurp the Second Amendment.

The agreement would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms, in a bid to keep such equipment out of the hands of rogue regimes and terrorist groups. One hundred fifty-three nations, including the United States, voted in favor of the treaty during a U.N. vote last April.

But gun-rights activists have blasted the treaty as a threat to “the rights and privacy of American gun owners,” and Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe wrote to Kerry on Tuesday to accuse him of “wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats.”

“The U.N. should not be deceived into thinking the U.S. will ratify a treaty just because it has been signed by the President or someone in his Administration,” he continued, attaching a list of 53 senators who voted to oppose America’s ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty back in March.

Any international treaty signed by the administration requires the approval of two-thirds of U.S. senators before it becomes the law of the land.

Many lawmakers in the House have also expressed concern over the agreement. 130 representatives sent a letter to President Obama in May, urging him not to sign a treaty they worry could be “used to justify the imposition of further [gun] controls within the United States.”...

Read more: Kerry set to sign 'gun-grabbing' UN treaty | The Daily Caller

 

[Moonglow]

Your ability to try and muster hate through deceit and ambiguities would be more better at use as a towel boy at a YMCA

Under the terms of the treaty, states are required to determine whether the shipment of arms to a second country would be used to commit atrocities or violate human rights or if they could diverted for such a purpose, and report back to the U.N. Secretariat on their efforts.

“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom,” Kerry said. “In fact the treaty recognizes the ability of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legit purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens, to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our Constitution.”

United States Signs Global Arms Trade Treaty | ThinkProgress

 

[paulitician]

Your ability to try and muster hate through deceit and ambiguities would be more better at use as a towel boy at a YMCA

Under the terms of the treaty, states are required to determine whether the shipment of arms to a second country would be used to commit atrocities or violate human rights or if they could diverted for such a purpose, and report back to the U.N. Secretariat on their efforts.

“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom,” Kerry said. “In fact the treaty recognizes the ability of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legit purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens, to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our Constitution.”

United States Signs Global Arms Trade Treaty | ThinkProgress

Not mustering hate. Just because you say it, doesn't make it fact. You're dismissed. Bye.

 

[R.C. Christian]

It's wording essentially means that you will no longer be able to buy a foreign gun.

 

[paulitician]

It's wording essentially means that you will no longer be able to buy a foreign gun.

Just another backdoor attempt at circumventing the 2nd Amendment. Hopefully this Treaty will not be ratified.

 

[Montecresto]

Rand Paul just now told Glenn Beck that he can easily get 34 votes to defeat this. And nobody posting here has likely read all of this treaty and the other treaties it links to and fully understands all its nuances. Attorneys and international lawyers and law professors disagree on what this means for US citizens. We do know that a UN rapporteur has stated that US private gun ownership is a deterrent to the UN agenda. And we know domestically the second amendment is under heavy attack and reoccurring and suspicious mass shootings keep gun grabbers in front of the microphone. Obama wasted no time last week to inform us he will be pushing for more gun restrictions on US citizens while simultaneously considering it perfectly fine to extend the second amendment, complete with high round magazine arms and surface to air missiles to the terrorists fighting against president Assad's forces in Syria.

 

[Vox]

Welcome to the NWO. Most 'American' Politicians no longer represent American Citizens. These days, they seem to represent everyone but American Citizens. They're doing everything in their power to destroy our Constitutional Sovereignty. We now have a rogue criminal Government. But hopefully, some brave American Heroes will stand up and oppose this farce. I guess we'll see.


Secretary of State John Kerry will sign the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on Wednesday, the State Department confirmed, setting up a Senate showdown over an international agreement many in Congress believe would usurp the Second Amendment.

The agreement would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms, in a bid to keep such equipment out of the hands of rogue regimes and terrorist groups. One hundred fifty-three nations, including the United States, voted in favor of the treaty during a U.N. vote last April.

But gun-rights activists have blasted the treaty as a threat to “the rights and privacy of American gun owners,” and Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe wrote to Kerry on Tuesday to accuse him of “wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats.”

“The U.N. should not be deceived into thinking the U.S. will ratify a treaty just because it has been signed by the President or someone in his Administration,” he continued, attaching a list of 53 senators who voted to oppose America’s ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty back in March.

Any international treaty signed by the administration requires the approval of two-thirds of U.S. senators before it becomes the law of the land.Many lawmakers in the House have also expressed concern over the agreement. 130 representatives sent a letter to President Obama in May, urging him not to sign a treaty they worry could be “used to justify the imposition of further [gun] controls within the United States.”...

Read more: Kerry set to sign 'gun-grabbing' UN treaty | The Daily Caller

it is dead on arrival.

case closed.

 

[paulitician]

Rand Paul just now told Glenn Beck that he can easily get 34 votes to defeat this. And nobody posting here has likely read all of this treaty and the other treaties it links to and fully understands all its nuances. Attorneys and international lawyers and law professors disagree on what this means for US citizens. We do know that a UN rapporteur has stated that US private gun ownership is a deterrent to the UN agenda. And we know domestically the second amendment is under heavy attack and reoccurring and suspicious mass shootings keep gun grabbers in front of the microphone. Obama wasted no time last week to inform us he will be pushing for more gun restrictions on US citizens while simultaneously considering it perfectly fine to extend the second amendment, complete with high round magazine arms and surface to air missiles to the terrorists fighting against president Assad's forces in Syria.

NWO Globalism. America is their last hurdle. They have to destroy its Constitution and Sovereignty. Our Congress should not ratify this.

 

[Moonglow]

We now have a rogue criminal Government.

Not mustering hate. Just because you say it, doesn't make it fact. You're dismissed. Bye.

 

[paulitician]

We now have a rogue criminal Government.

Not mustering hate. Just because you say it, doesn't make it fact. You're dismissed. Bye.

We do have a rogue criminal Government. You actually think otherwise?...

 

[Pete7469]

It's wording essentially means that you will no longer be able to buy a foreign gun.

Just another backdoor attempt at circumventing the 2nd Amendment. Hopefully this Treaty will not be ratified.

It may not be done by the current senate, but does it not stay in limbo then? Can a new president withdraw the State Dept signature? I can envision a group of democrook whores in the future bringing it up in the dead of night and pushing it through.

 

[Edgetho]

Welcome to the NWO. Most 'American' Politicians no longer represent American Citizens. These days, they seem to represent everyone but American Citizens. They're doing everything in their power to destroy our Constitutional Sovereignty. We now have a rogue criminal Government. But hopefully, some brave American Heroes will stand up and oppose this farce. I guess we'll see.


Secretary of State John Kerry will sign the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on Wednesday, the State Department confirmed, setting up a Senate showdown over an international agreement many in Congress believe would usurp the Second Amendment.

The agreement would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms, in a bid to keep such equipment out of the hands of rogue regimes and terrorist groups. One hundred fifty-three nations, including the United States, voted in favor of the treaty during a U.N. vote last April.

But gun-rights activists have blasted the treaty as a threat to “the rights and privacy of American gun owners,” and Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe wrote to Kerry on Tuesday to accuse him of “wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats.”

“The U.N. should not be deceived into thinking the U.S. will ratify a treaty just because it has been signed by the President or someone in his Administration,” he continued, attaching a list of 53 senators who voted to oppose America’s ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty back in March.

Any international treaty signed by the administration requires the approval of two-thirds of U.S. senators before it becomes the law of the land.Many lawmakers in the House have also expressed concern over the agreement. 130 representatives sent a letter to President Obama in May, urging him not to sign a treaty they worry could be “used to justify the imposition of further [gun] controls within the United States.”...

Read more: Kerry set to sign 'gun-grabbing' UN treaty | The Daily Caller

it is dead on arrival.

case closed.

Not really.

It can lay around in the Senate for decades. Treaties have been known to do that.

Internationally, other Countries couldn't care less if the Senate approves it or not. To the International Community, it is fully enforceable as soon as the traitor, kerry, signs it.

Domestically? That's another story. They can't enforce it domestically.

But it can still lay around in the Senate for---- An interminable period of time. There's no rule against it and it does happen.

 

[BullKurtz]

Not really.

It can lay around in the Senate for decades. Treaties have been known to do that.

Internationally, other Countries couldn't care less if the Senate approves it or not. To the International Community, it is fully enforceable as soon as the traitor, kerry, signs it.

Domestically? That's another story. They can't enforce it domestically.

But it can still lay around in the Senate for---- An interminable period of time. There's no rule against it and it does happen.

Yep, Clinturd signed Kyotto 16 years ago and it's never going to pass the Senate.

 

[BlindBoo]

Upon what do "many" in the Senate base their belief that an agreement that "would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms" would infringe upon the 2nd amendment internally?

My guess is that check from the NRA!

The UN doesn't have the authority to do that here even if the treaty was ratified.

I have no doubt that it will not be ratified any time soon.

 

[Montecresto]

Upon what do "many" in the Senate base their belief that an agreement that "would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms" would infringe upon the 2nd amendment internally?

My guess is that check from the NRA!

The UN doesn't have the authority to do that here even if the treaty was ratified.

I have no doubt that it will not be ratified any time soon.

The UN hasn't the authority to intervene in our internal affairs? That's what Iraq, A-Stan, and Syria thought.

 

[Spoonman]

Your ability to try and muster hate through deceit and ambiguities would be more better at use as a towel boy at a YMCA

Under the terms of the treaty, states are required to determine whether the shipment of arms to a second country would be used to commit atrocities or violate human rights or if they could diverted for such a purpose, and report back to the U.N. Secretariat on their efforts.

“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom,” Kerry said. “In fact the treaty recognizes the ability of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legit purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens, to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our Constitution.”

United States Signs Global Arms Trade Treaty | ThinkProgress

are you speaking about kerry or obama here

 

[Spoonman]

Welcome to the NWO. Most 'American' Politicians no longer represent American Citizens. These days, they seem to represent everyone but American Citizens. They're doing everything in their power to destroy our Constitutional Sovereignty. We now have a rogue criminal Government. But hopefully, some brave American Heroes will stand up and oppose this farce. I guess we'll see.


Secretary of State John Kerry will sign the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on Wednesday, the State Department confirmed, setting up a Senate showdown over an international agreement many in Congress believe would usurp the Second Amendment.

The agreement would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms, in a bid to keep such equipment out of the hands of rogue regimes and terrorist groups. One hundred fifty-three nations, including the United States, voted in favor of the treaty during a U.N. vote last April.

But gun-rights activists have blasted the treaty as a threat to “the rights and privacy of American gun owners,” and Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe wrote to Kerry on Tuesday to accuse him of “wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats.”

“The U.N. should not be deceived into thinking the U.S. will ratify a treaty just because it has been signed by the President or someone in his Administration,” he continued, attaching a list of 53 senators who voted to oppose America’s ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty back in March.

Any international treaty signed by the administration requires the approval of two-thirds of U.S. senators before it becomes the law of the land.

Many lawmakers in the House have also expressed concern over the agreement. 130 representatives sent a letter to President Obama in May, urging him not to sign a treaty they worry could be “used to justify the imposition of further [gun] controls within the United States.”...

Read more: Kerry set to sign 'gun-grabbing' UN treaty | The Daily Caller

the game is they will put every anti gun vote in place they can. this one doesn't need the vote of the american people who would surely reject it.

 

[Vox]

Welcome to the NWO. Most 'American' Politicians no longer represent American Citizens. These days, they seem to represent everyone but American Citizens. They're doing everything in their power to destroy our Constitutional Sovereignty. We now have a rogue criminal Government. But hopefully, some brave American Heroes will stand up and oppose this farce. I guess we'll see.


Secretary of State John Kerry will sign the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty on Wednesday, the State Department confirmed, setting up a Senate showdown over an international agreement many in Congress believe would usurp the Second Amendment.

The agreement would regulate international trade in conventional weapons, including small arms, in a bid to keep such equipment out of the hands of rogue regimes and terrorist groups. One hundred fifty-three nations, including the United States, voted in favor of the treaty during a U.N. vote last April.

But gun-rights activists have blasted the treaty as a threat to “the rights and privacy of American gun owners,” and Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe wrote to Kerry on Tuesday to accuse him of “wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats.”

“The U.N. should not be deceived into thinking the U.S. will ratify a treaty just because it has been signed by the President or someone in his Administration,” he continued, attaching a list of 53 senators who voted to oppose America’s ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty back in March.

Any international treaty signed by the administration requires the approval of two-thirds of U.S. senators before it becomes the law of the land.Many lawmakers in the House have also expressed concern over the agreement. 130 representatives sent a letter to President Obama in May, urging him not to sign a treaty they worry could be “used to justify the imposition of further [gun] controls within the United States.”...

Read more: Kerry set to sign 'gun-grabbing' UN treaty | The Daily Caller

it is dead on arrival.

case closed.

Not really.

It can lay around in the Senate for decades. Treaties have been known to do that.

Internationally, other Countries couldn't care less if the Senate approves it or not. To the International Community, it is fully enforceable as soon as the traitor, kerry, signs it.

Domestically? That's another story. They can't enforce it domestically.

But it can still lay around in the Senate for---- An interminable period of time. There's no rule against it and it does happen.

That is true, but the signature of tve Sec of State can be withdrawn as well( though I am not quite sure on the procedure)

 

[Wacky Quacky]

This crap is refuted every single time some dingbat posts about it. There is nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, in that treaty that would restrict your ability to own a gun. In fact, the supreme court has already ruled that no treaty can over-rule the constitution or US law.

 

[Vox]

Not really.

It can lay around in the Senate for decades. Treaties have been known to do that.

Internationally, other Countries couldn't care less if the Senate approves it or not. To the International Community, it is fully enforceable as soon as the traitor, kerry, signs it.

Domestically? That's another story. They can't enforce it domestically.

But it can still lay around in the Senate for---- An interminable period of time. There's no rule against it and it does happen.

Yep, Clinturd signed Kyotto 16 years ago and it's never going to pass the Senate.

And now it expired and nobody will reintroduce it after it became known internationally that AGW is a scam