REVxERIK
CLASSIC LIBERAL
- Sep 2, 2009
- 715
- 21
- 16
the birthers aren't done yet? JEEEEZZZ
Kenyan Birth Certificate 2
- Thread starter RadiomanATL
- Start date
the birthers aren't done yet? JEEEEZZZ
DavidS
Anti-Tea Party Member
Hopefully this should deter her.
Judge tosses out Army captain's complaint questioning president's birth; Orly Taitz on notice - Breaking News - Ledger-Enquirer.com
U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land today tossed out a complaint by an Army captain fighting deployment to Iraq by questioning the legitimacy of President Barack Obama.
Land also put attorney Orly Taitz, who represents Capt. Connie Rhodes and is a leader in the national birther movement, on notice by stating that she could face sanctions if she ever files a similar frivolous lawsuit in his court.
(Rhodes) has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as president of the United States, Land states in his order. Instead, she uses her complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the president is an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.
Rhodes, who filed her complaint Sept. 4 in the Columbus Division of U.S. District Court, argued that some facts point to Obama not being naturalized or possibly an illegal immigrant.
paperview
Life is Good
LOL. I love it! Way to go judge Land.
Hopefully this should deter her.
Judge tosses out Army captain's complaint questioning president's birth; Orly Taitz on notice - Breaking News - Ledger-Enquirer.com
U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land today tossed out a complaint by an Army captain fighting deployment to Iraq by questioning the legitimacy of President Barack Obama.
Land also put attorney Orly Taitz, who represents Capt. Connie Rhodes and is a leader in the national “birther” movement, on notice by stating that she could face sanctions if she ever files a similar “frivolous” lawsuit in his court.
“(Rhodes) has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as president of the United States,” Land states in his order. “Instead, she uses her complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the president is ‘an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.’”
Rhodes, who filed her complaint Sept. 4 in the Columbus Division of U.S. District Court, argued that some facts point to Obama not being naturalized or possibly an illegal immigrant.
Emma
Evil Liberal Leftist
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss2yWRwva2A[/ame]
jillian
Princess
Someone hit Emma with some rep for that... I have to spread it around before i can get her for that one.
lol... that''s just awesome.
lol... that''s just awesome.
Emma
Evil Liberal Leftist
I love it ...
I'm convinced that Mr. O Rly is the one behind the forged birth certificates. God knows if she were MY wife, I do everything in my power to make sure she stayed on the road and away from home.
jillian
Princess
She's just such a freak. How desperate do they have to be to listen to someone like her?
Emma
Evil Liberal Leftist
BTW...
You all do realize that ONE day after Judge Land flayed her alive and she proceeded to call him a traitor and part of the conspiracy, she filed another motion WITH THE SAME COURT, containing the SAME CRAP... only this time accusing the Court of being 'sarcastic' and controlled by the 'regime'.
RHODES v MacDONALD - 15 - Request for stay of deployment pending motion for reconsideration of judgment - Gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.15.0
A few choice excerpts, including accusing the Judge of treason:
"Plaintiff submits that to advocate a breach of constitutional oaths to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is in fact a very practical form of “adhering” to those enemies, foreign and domestic, and thus is tantamount to treason, as Defined in Article III, Section 3, even when pronounced in Court."
"This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous. Rule 11 demands more of the Court than use of its provisions as a means of suppressing the First Amendment Right to Petition regarding questions of truly historical, in fact epic and epochal, importance in the history of this nation."
"Plaintiff was entitled to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss not sooner than Thursday, October 1, 2009, without penalty or prejudice, absent a specific warning from the Court of intention to vary from the local rules. Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto President is not even nominally the Commander-in-Chief of the Article III Judiciary."
"The fact that the Court’s 14 page order does not address any actual statements in Plaintiff’s complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the Court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate “chain of command” alleged above not to address at least the three key questions asserted in Plaintiff’s complaint including (1) a U.S. ARMY OFFICER’S OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, (2) the historical importance of an independent army corps to the constitutional balance of powers and Republican Form of Government guaranteed by the Constitution, and (3) the Ninth Amendment reservation of rights in the people to question the legitimacy and eligibility of their elected officials when questions arise from time-to-time which were not contemplated by the Founding Fathers."
"The Court’s failure to address these three key issues again, standing alone, is suggestive that the executive branch is exercising control over the Court’s decision-making process, and is a sufficient ground, by itself, to justify this Court’s grant of an EMERGENCY STAY OF DEPLOYMENT for at least TEN DAYS"
"It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the Constitution did not anticipate the election of a man as a President who appears to have prevaricated about his place of birth and then ordered his loyal followers to ridicule all those who questioned the contradictions inherent in his own biography, such as the obvious fact that his Father was an (admittedly disloyal and possibly treacherous) Subject of the British Crown when he was born, even though this fact alone would disqualify the President as a “natural born citizen”, regardless of his place of birth."
"This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous."
Oh, Judge Land is gonna LOVE this LOL
You all do realize that ONE day after Judge Land flayed her alive and she proceeded to call him a traitor and part of the conspiracy, she filed another motion WITH THE SAME COURT, containing the SAME CRAP... only this time accusing the Court of being 'sarcastic' and controlled by the 'regime'.
RHODES v MacDONALD - 15 - Request for stay of deployment pending motion for reconsideration of judgment - Gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.15.0
A few choice excerpts, including accusing the Judge of treason:
"Plaintiff submits that to advocate a breach of constitutional oaths to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is in fact a very practical form of “adhering” to those enemies, foreign and domestic, and thus is tantamount to treason, as Defined in Article III, Section 3, even when pronounced in Court."
"This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous. Rule 11 demands more of the Court than use of its provisions as a means of suppressing the First Amendment Right to Petition regarding questions of truly historical, in fact epic and epochal, importance in the history of this nation."
"Plaintiff was entitled to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss not sooner than Thursday, October 1, 2009, without penalty or prejudice, absent a specific warning from the Court of intention to vary from the local rules. Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto President is not even nominally the Commander-in-Chief of the Article III Judiciary."
"The fact that the Court’s 14 page order does not address any actual statements in Plaintiff’s complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the Court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate “chain of command” alleged above not to address at least the three key questions asserted in Plaintiff’s complaint including (1) a U.S. ARMY OFFICER’S OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, (2) the historical importance of an independent army corps to the constitutional balance of powers and Republican Form of Government guaranteed by the Constitution, and (3) the Ninth Amendment reservation of rights in the people to question the legitimacy and eligibility of their elected officials when questions arise from time-to-time which were not contemplated by the Founding Fathers."
"The Court’s failure to address these three key issues again, standing alone, is suggestive that the executive branch is exercising control over the Court’s decision-making process, and is a sufficient ground, by itself, to justify this Court’s grant of an EMERGENCY STAY OF DEPLOYMENT for at least TEN DAYS"
"It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the Constitution did not anticipate the election of a man as a President who appears to have prevaricated about his place of birth and then ordered his loyal followers to ridicule all those who questioned the contradictions inherent in his own biography, such as the obvious fact that his Father was an (admittedly disloyal and possibly treacherous) Subject of the British Crown when he was born, even though this fact alone would disqualify the President as a “natural born citizen”, regardless of his place of birth."
"This Court has threatened the undersigned counsel with sanctions for advocating that a legally conscious, procedurally sophisticated, and constitutionally aware army officers corps is the best protection against the encroachment of anti-democratic, authoritarian, neo-Fascistic or Palaeo-Communistic dictatorship in this country, without pointing to any specific language, facts, or allegations of fact in the Complaint or TRO as frivolous."
Oh, Judge Land is gonna LOVE this LOL
Last edited:
Emma
Evil Liberal Leftist
Zona
A guy in ariZONA
fyi from the article!Ame®icano;1532520 said:
Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery.
If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.
Thanks for clarification.
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #35
The federal government has finally started an investigation of the citizenships of those birthers who have gone to the extreme.
If they can't prove their citizenship, they either are to be deported or indefinitely interned.
If they can't prove their citizenship, they either are to be deported or indefinitely interned.
What about illegals who have gone extreme?
jillian
Princess
Ame®icano;1532546 said:
It's a little bit more than clarification.... there's still motion practice that has to be done where they put in "evidence" other than Orly the nutcase's fevered imaginings. That's where each of these cases has been dismissed.
And scheduling a trial IF it wasn't dismissed is pro forma and says nothing about the meritless nature of the claim.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Student at Brown Univ sends email to 3,800 non-faculty employees. "What do you do all day?"
- Started by StatesRightsForever
- Replies: 4
-
FBI and Chilean police take down international gang of thieves
- Started by scruffy
- Replies: 3
-
When asked if he needs to uphold the Constitution. trump says "I don’t know?"- Started by JimH52
- Replies: 4
-
Putin’s toxic brew is pure Nicholas I (the czar who lost Crimean war, and than killed himself⚰️🇷🇺)- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
