Kavanaugh Accuser Won't Testify

[Asclepias]

Nope. Since its not a legal or civil matter its up to congress to get the most accurate information regarding this allegation and make a decision.

And they have asked her to testify. Regardless, it is still up to the accuser to put up substantial proof. Otherwise we would be obligated to investigate every moon beam accusation ever made. She has of yet supplied any information to substantiate her claims.

They have asked her to testify to congress. They haven't demanded the FBI get all the information it can and present it to congress.

They don’t have to demand that of the FBI. Her lawyer even said that they don’t need the FBI. Again, until there is substantial evidence why do it. The next thing you know some clown will come forward and say they saw him steal a slurpee but they can’t say which 7-11 or when. I guess that should be investigated as well. She needs at least enough proof to errant an investigation. She doesn’t have that.

I know they dont have to. They dont want anything revealed so they wont. They are not asking to leverage an organization that can quickly put this to rest.

Stick to the salient points. She hasn’t presented enough evidence to warrant. It has nothing to do with them being afraid of what is revealed.

I’m going on record now that I saw diane Feinstein roll a homeless person taking a shit on the street in san Fransisco then shove a billy club up his ass. I want her investigated. Chuck Schumer has my letter so you know it’s true.

Is Feinstein under proceedings to be appointed a lifetime position to the SC? If not, your request is denied.

 

[dave p]

And they have asked her to testify. Regardless, it is still up to the accuser to put up substantial proof. Otherwise we would be obligated to investigate every moon beam accusation ever made. She has of yet supplied any information to substantiate her claims.

They have asked her to testify to congress. They haven't demanded the FBI get all the information it can and present it to congress.

They don’t have to demand that of the FBI. Her lawyer even said that they don’t need the FBI. Again, until there is substantial evidence why do it. The next thing you know some clown will come forward and say they saw him steal a slurpee but they can’t say which 7-11 or when. I guess that should be investigated as well. She needs at least enough proof to errant an investigation. She doesn’t have that.

I know they dont have to. They dont want anything revealed so they wont. They are not asking to leverage an organization that can quickly put this to rest.

Stick to the salient points. She hasn’t presented enough evidence to warrant. It has nothing to do with them being afraid of what is revealed.

I’m going on record now that I saw diane Feinstein roll a homeless person taking a shit on the street in san Fransisco then shove a billy club up his ass. I want her investigated. Chuck Schumer has my letter so you know it’s true.

Is Feinstein under proceedings to be appointed a lifetime position to the SC? If not, your request is denied.

Both are equally silly.

 

[Pop23]

She has a number of obstacles to overcome.

1. The timing stinks to high heaven.
2. She's offered zero evidence beyond her simple accusation that anything happened. The witnesses she's named say nothing happened.
3. When given the opportunity to testify under oath, she backed away.

These things lead inevitably to political hit job, not substantive accusation.

She has zero obstacles to overcome. This is on congress and Drumpf to do or not do something.

1. Timing doesnt matter.
2. No the witness said he "couldnt recollect" which is a legal way of protecting your ass in the event you end up in court.
3. Not a problem. The FBI wasnt asking her to testify. Congress was.

Deflect all you want. She has major problems.

Prove it then. Have the FBI investigate for a week.

Maybe you don’t understand. It is up to the accuser to prove it. He is innocent until proven guilty, the accuser must file substantial proof. She hasn’t. She can open a case with the local authorities, she hasn’t. This is not an FBI matter. If she is so confident, she can supply evidence and start the investigation herself or her lawyer can. She has nothing.

Nope. Since its not a legal or civil matter its up to congress to get the most accurate information regarding this allegation and make a decision.

They have all that exists:

She said he did it and supplied witness names, two of which said it never happened

He said it didn't and that is backed up by the witnesses

She supplied a note from a Therapist, then both her and her husband dispute even that.

There is no place or time of when it allegedly happened.

There is absolutely no evidence in which TO investigate.

 

[Pop23]

This is all out in the open now. Has been for days. Not a single new witness has stepped forward and dumbass thinks that a few interviews by the FBI (oh by the way, if they think you are lying to them, will put you in the pen) is going to change this? How?

Go!

 

[dave p]

She has zero obstacles to overcome. This is on congress and Drumpf to do or not do something.

1. Timing doesnt matter.
2. No the witness said he "couldnt recollect" which is a legal way of protecting your ass in the event you end up in court.
3. Not a problem. The FBI wasnt asking her to testify. Congress was.

Deflect all you want. She has major problems.

Prove it then. Have the FBI investigate for a week.

Maybe you don’t understand. It is up to the accuser to prove it. He is innocent until proven guilty, the accuser must file substantial proof. She hasn’t. She can open a case with the local authorities, she hasn’t. This is not an FBI matter. If she is so confident, she can supply evidence and start the investigation herself or her lawyer can. She has nothing.

Nope. Since its not a legal or civil matter its up to congress to get the most accurate information regarding this allegation and make a decision.

They have all that exists:

She said he did it and supplied witness names, two of which said it never happened

He said it didn't and that is backed up by the witnesses

She supplied a note from a Therapist, then both her and her husband dispute even that.

There is no place or time of when it allegedly happened.

There is absolutely no evidence in which TO investigate.

You are arguing with a mental pigmy.

 

[Pop23]

Deflect all you want. She has major problems.

Prove it then. Have the FBI investigate for a week.

Maybe you don’t understand. It is up to the accuser to prove it. He is innocent until proven guilty, the accuser must file substantial proof. She hasn’t. She can open a case with the local authorities, she hasn’t. This is not an FBI matter. If she is so confident, she can supply evidence and start the investigation herself or her lawyer can. She has nothing.

Nope. Since its not a legal or civil matter its up to congress to get the most accurate information regarding this allegation and make a decision.

They have all that exists:

She said he did it and supplied witness names, two of which said it never happened

He said it didn't and that is backed up by the witnesses

She supplied a note from a Therapist, then both her and her husband dispute even that.

There is no place or time of when it allegedly happened.

There is absolutely no evidence in which TO investigate.

You are arguing with a mental pigmy.

As we used to say at my High School parties. NO SHIT LITTLE BEAVER!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Neither is the FBI...see Strozk and Page.

So since two former FBI agents are not objective then the entire organization is not objective?

You just said all of Congress is not objective?

Correct. Its inherent in the make up of congress that they are not objective. Their jobs exist so they represent their constituents views.

Proof?

Proof of what? If youre talking about my post thats common knowledge.

It is not true. It was like 4 and both were Federal Employees with witnesses and phone records. It was fluid. This is horse shit. You also said Congress is biased so then they won’t care what the FBI finds.

This is not an FBI case. Hill and Thomas were federal employees. So it was a fed case.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Neither is the FBI...see Strozk and Page.

So since two former FBI agents are not objective then the entire organization is not objective?

You just said all of Congress is not objective?

Correct. Its inherent in the make up of congress that they are not objective. Their jobs exist so they represent their constituents views.

Proof?

Proof of what? If youre talking about my post thats common knowledge.

Nope you are lying again.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

She cannot recall time or place. No court would ever convict Kavanaugh.

Yeah being past the statute of limitations kind of makes it a no brainer. Makes you wonder why the repubs are so afraid of having the FBI investigate the claims though.

What can the FBI do that Congress can't?

You should google what the FBI does vs what Congress does. I dont have time to teach you the basic job of each group if you dont already know.

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

 

[Asclepias]

Yeah being past the statute of limitations kind of makes it a no brainer. Makes you wonder why the repubs are so afraid of having the FBI investigate the claims though.

What can the FBI do that Congress can't?

You should google what the FBI does vs what Congress does. I dont have time to teach you the basic job of each group if you dont already know.

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What can the FBI do that Congress can't?

You should google what the FBI does vs what Congress does. I dont have time to teach you the basic job of each group if you dont already know.

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

There were multiple claims with multiple instances

 

[Asclepias]

You should google what the FBI does vs what Congress does. I dont have time to teach you the basic job of each group if you dont already know.

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

There were multiple claims with multiple instances

All of them occurring from 1981-1983. Thats still 6 years after the statute of limitations runs out.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

There were multiple claims with multiple instances

All of them occurring from 1981-1983. Thats still 6 years after the statute of limitations runs out.

They were fed employees with records. It was fluid because the Feds could pull phone records and talk to witnesses and both were adults and there were multiple instances. Apples and Oranges to Kavanaugh.

Let the FBI investigate but it’s out of their jurisdiction. I am surprised the Keebler Elf has not opined.

 

[bodecea]

Until the FBI investigates him again.

The FBI has investigated him 25× for his previous positions and 6× for this nomination.

Delay! Delay! Delay!

Despicable Dem vermin.

If she doesn't testify, she's not really much of a thing, is she?

 

[Asclepias]

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

There were multiple claims with multiple instances

All of them occurring from 1981-1983. Thats still 6 years after the statute of limitations runs out.

They were fed employees with records. It was fluid because the Feds could pull phone records and talk to witnesses and both were adults and there were multiple instances. Apples and Oranges to Kavanaugh.

Let the FBI investigate but it’s out of their jurisdiction. I am surprised the Keebler Elf has not opined.

No it wasnt fluid. The FBI was directed to investigate Anita Hills claims by the WH in 1991. Same circumstances.

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days - CNNPolitics


Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

I wonder what deflection youre going to post now that you have to take another big L?

 

[B. Kidd]

Until the FBI investigates him again.

The FBI has investigated him 25× for his previous positions and 6× for this nomination.

Delay! Delay! Delay!

Despicable Dem vermin.

If she doesn't testify, she's not really much of a thing, is she?

She's a shill that sits at a fake winning slot machine at the entrance to Casino Demonrat Royale.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

What can the FBI do that Congress can't?

You should google what the FBI does vs what Congress does. I dont have time to teach you the basic job of each group if you dont already know.

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

So you’re agreeing it was a waste of time on crap that didn’t matter.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

There were multiple claims with multiple instances

All of them occurring from 1981-1983. Thats still 6 years after the statute of limitations runs out.

They were fed employees with records. It was fluid because the Feds could pull phone records and talk to witnesses and both were adults and there were multiple instances. Apples and Oranges to Kavanaugh.

Let the FBI investigate but it’s out of their jurisdiction. I am surprised the Keebler Elf has not opined.

No it wasnt fluid. The FBI was directed to investigate Anita Hills claims by the WH in 1991. Same circumstances.

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days - CNNPolitics


Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

I wonder what deflection youre going to post now that you have to take another big L?

I just explained to you what I meant by fluid. Both were fed employees, adults, phone records and witnesses. Not sure where you disagree there?

None of those exist with the present case.

 

[Asclepias]

You should google what the FBI does vs what Congress does. I dont have time to teach you the basic job of each group if you dont already know.

You couldn’t teach a pet rock to stay. The FBI doesn’t investigate non-Federal crimes. They don’t investigate horseshit with no information to even start from and they aren’t going to investigate something the statute of limitations ran out on. The amount of evidence they have to start any investigation here is as empty as your head.

Youre ignorant of the facts. They investigated the Anita Hill case.

Because she said he harassed her at work, in a Federal court house as a federal employee. It was their jurisdiction.

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

So you’re agreeing it was a waste of time on crap that didn’t matter.

No. I'm saying that you dont know what youre talking about. Cant you read?

 

[Asclepias]

Statute of limitation for sexual harassment is 2 years.under federal law. The claim was 10 years old having occurred in 1981. Anita Hill brought up the accusations in 1991.

There were multiple claims with multiple instances

All of them occurring from 1981-1983. Thats still 6 years after the statute of limitations runs out.

They were fed employees with records. It was fluid because the Feds could pull phone records and talk to witnesses and both were adults and there were multiple instances. Apples and Oranges to Kavanaugh.

Let the FBI investigate but it’s out of their jurisdiction. I am surprised the Keebler Elf has not opined.

No it wasnt fluid. The FBI was directed to investigate Anita Hills claims by the WH in 1991. Same circumstances.

The FBI did investigate Anita Hill's accusation, and it took 3 days - CNNPolitics


Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

I wonder what deflection youre going to post now that you have to take another big L?

I just explained to you what I meant by fluid. Both were fed employees, adults, phone records and witnesses. Not sure where you disagree there?

None of those exist with the present case.

I know you explained, but you were wrong. Doesnt make any difference that they were fed employees. The statutes had run out. Thats why the WH had to direct the FBI to investigate.