Kate's Breasts

[Synthaholic]

I have a difficult time mustering outrage on behalf of one of the most privileged families in the world.

I am not at all surprised by your double standard. They're wealthy and privileged therefore she deserves it.

You're scum.

Interesting that you feel the female body is something to be embarrassed over.

Your self-loathing is evident.

 

[California Girl]

The Tricky ***** is right on the money.

IF you would be pissed if it happened to your wife or girlfriend or to your daughter, you already have the standard by which this is properly judged.

Sorry, Liability, there is no room for you on my moral high ground. You viewed the images, you are part of the problem. It's that simple. Without demand, there would be no supply. Therefore, you lost your chance to join me in being a moral, decent human being when you looked at pictures that should never have been taken.

Thankfully, I was not seeking a place on YOUR moral high ground. I mean, seriously, that's a matter of indifference to me. I hope that'/s clear.

And, I don't make judgments on the same bases that you seem to. In fact, some of your criteria are simply silly, imho.

That said, when you are right (at least in part) I have no problem noting it and voicing my agreement -- to that extent.

The images are on the web. I didn't place them there. And I am curious enough to look. It was in looking at them, and at the photographic evidence of how far away the paparazzi scumbag was from her when he took the shots, that I was able to ascertain just exactly how much of a violation of her rights had taken place.

And oh yeah. She has a decent figure and her boobs look pretty nice.

Bullshit. You're just another scummy little shit who can't mind their own ******* business. Why the hell you can't just admit it is beyond me.... shame, perhaps. But the fact remains, people like you drive this sick behavior. No demand, no supply. It really is that simple. If you wouldn't like it to happen to your nearest and dearest, then don't participate when it is someone else's. Not overly complicated.

 

[Synthaholic]

She does need to gain some weight, but someone's privacy should not be invaded like that. If I was William I would be using my influence to get some people

Her weight is her business. I wonder how liberals would react if it had been Michele Obama? I suspect y'all would be in total meltdown, rightly so. It sickens me that people think this is no big deal.

Why would Michelle Obama sunbathe nude? To get a better tan?

You really are not very intelligent, despite your desperate attempts to convince us otherwise.

 

[Liability]

Sorry, Liability, there is no room for you on my moral high ground. You viewed the images, you are part of the problem. It's that simple. Without demand, there would be no supply. Therefore, you lost your chance to join me in being a moral, decent human being when you looked at pictures that should never have been taken.

Thankfully, I was not seeking a place on YOUR moral high ground. I mean, seriously, that's a matter of indifference to me. I hope that'/s clear.

And, I don't make judgments on the same bases that you seem to. In fact, some of your criteria are simply silly, imho.

That said, when you are right (at least in part) I have no problem noting it and voicing my agreement -- to that extent.

The images are on the web. I didn't place them there. And I am curious enough to look. It was in looking at them, and at the photographic evidence of how far away the paparazzi scumbag was from her when he took the shots, that I was able to ascertain just exactly how much of a violation of her rights had taken place.

And oh yeah. She has a decent figure and her boobs look pretty nice.

Bullshit. You're just another scummy little shit who can't mind their own ******* business. Why the hell you can't just admit it is beyond me.... shame, perhaps. But the fact remains, people like you drive this sick behavior. No demand, no supply. It really is that simple. If you wouldn't like it to happen to your nearest and dearest, then don't participate when it is someone else's. Not overly complicated.

You are about as stupid as TderpM. Seriously.

A goon you were. A goon you remain.

But the princess does have decent enough tits.

 

[California Girl]

I have a difficult time mustering outrage on behalf of one of the most privileged families in the world.

I am not at all surprised by your double standard. They're wealthy and privileged therefore she deserves it.

You're scum.

Interesting that you feel the female body is something to be embarrassed over.

Your self-loathing is evident.

How far over your head is this rather basic concept? She has the right to privacy - regardless of who she is. Just like you do, and I do.... it has nothing to do with the female body... it's about the invasion of her privacy. Of course, that basic concept is - evidently - waaaay over your intellectual pay grade.

 

[Liability]

I do NOT want to see the incumbent First Lady in ANY revealing photos.

 

[Synthaholic]

Why is the Duchess sunbathing topless anyway? When does she ever appear in public where that much skin would ever be showing? I doubt she has ever showed up in public in so much as a sleeveless top.

Perhaps they needed a publicity bump.

 

[Synthaholic]

I am not at all surprised by your double standard. They're wealthy and privileged therefore she deserves it.

You're scum.

Interesting that you feel the female body is something to be embarrassed over.

Your self-loathing is evident.

How far over your head is this rather basic concept? She has the right to privacy - regardless of who she is. Just like you do, and I do.... it has nothing to do with the female body... it's about the invasion of her privacy. Of course, that basic concept is - evidently - waaaay over your intellectual pay grade.

Please show where she has a right to privacy.

This should be good.

 

[California Girl]

Thankfully, I was not seeking a place on YOUR moral high ground. I mean, seriously, that's a matter of indifference to me. I hope that'/s clear.

And, I don't make judgments on the same bases that you seem to. In fact, some of your criteria are simply silly, imho.

That said, when you are right (at least in part) I have no problem noting it and voicing my agreement -- to that extent.

The images are on the web. I didn't place them there. And I am curious enough to look. It was in looking at them, and at the photographic evidence of how far away the paparazzi scumbag was from her when he took the shots, that I was able to ascertain just exactly how much of a violation of her rights had taken place.

And oh yeah. She has a decent figure and her boobs look pretty nice.

Bullshit. You're just another scummy little shit who can't mind their own ******* business. Why the hell you can't just admit it is beyond me.... shame, perhaps. But the fact remains, people like you drive this sick behavior. No demand, no supply. It really is that simple. If you wouldn't like it to happen to your nearest and dearest, then don't participate when it is someone else's. Not overly complicated.

You are about as stupid as TderpM. Seriously.

A goon you were. A goon you remain.

But the princess does have decent enough tits.

And I'm sure you'd be absolutely cool with people drooling over your loved one's body too.... regardless of how those images were obtained.

You're a hypocrite... and, frankly, I'd rather be stupid than a hypocrite. Happily, I am neither. I just have moral standards.

 

[Synthaholic]

I do NOT want to see the incumbent First Lady in ANY revealing photos.

We all figured out why that is quite a while ago.

 

[California Girl]

Interesting that you feel the female body is something to be embarrassed over.

Your self-loathing is evident.

How far over your head is this rather basic concept? She has the right to privacy - regardless of who she is. Just like you do, and I do.... it has nothing to do with the female body... it's about the invasion of her privacy. Of course, that basic concept is - evidently - waaaay over your intellectual pay grade.

Please show where she has a right to privacy.

This should be good.

She was in a private residence in France... which happens to have some of the strictest privacy laws in the world.

Make an ass of yourself often?

 

[Synthaholic]

Bullshit. You're just another scummy little shit who can't mind their own ******* business. Why the hell you can't just admit it is beyond me.... shame, perhaps. But the fact remains, people like you drive this sick behavior. No demand, no supply. It really is that simple. If you wouldn't like it to happen to your nearest and dearest, then don't participate when it is someone else's. Not overly complicated.

You are about as stupid as TderpM. Seriously.

A goon you were. A goon you remain.

But the princess does have decent enough tits.

And I'm sure you'd be absolutely cool with people drooling over your loved one's body too.... regardless of how those images were obtained.

You're a hypocrite... and, frankly, I'd rather be stupid than a hypocrite. Happily, I am neither. I just have moral standards.

See, my loved ones would not be naked outside.

 

[Liability]

I do NOT want to see the incumbent First Lady in ANY revealing photos.

We all figured out why that is quite a while ago.

No. You probably didn't.

But you are always free to pretend that your speculation is the same as "fact."

 

[Synthaholic]

How far over your head is this rather basic concept? She has the right to privacy - regardless of who she is. Just like you do, and I do.... it has nothing to do with the female body... it's about the invasion of her privacy. Of course, that basic concept is - evidently - waaaay over your intellectual pay grade.

Please show where she has a right to privacy.

This should be good.

She was in a private residence in France... which happens to have some of the strictest privacy laws in the world.

Make an ass of yourself often?

Show us. I think you're just flapping your gums as always.

And while you're at it, show whether these so-called privacy laws that you are pulling out of your ass apply to the French, or anybody on French soil.

 

[Luissa]

She does need to gain some weight, but someone's privacy should not be invaded like that. If I was William I would be using my influence to get some people

Her weight is her business. I wonder how liberals would react if it had been Michele Obama? I suspect y'all would be in total meltdown, rightly so. It sickens me that people think this is no big deal.

Um, how much more do you want me to react? Should i have cussed or something?
Like I said, no one's privacy should be invaded this way. And yes she needs to gain weight. Yes, her weight is her issue. But There is a difference in thinking someone should gain weight, because I don't know getting too skinny is a health risk, then calling the first lady a fat cow.
Go have faux outrage at the liberal somewhere else, Cali. I am sorry I didn't fall on the floor when expressing my outrage about the issue.

 

[California Girl]

Please show where she has a right to privacy.

This should be good.

She was in a private residence in France... which happens to have some of the strictest privacy laws in the world.

Make an ass of yourself often?

Show us. I think you're just flapping your gums as always.

And while you're at it, show whether these so-called privacy laws that you are pulling out of your ass apply to the French, or anybody on French soil.

Since I know that a link to the actual french law - in the french language - would be above your intellectual paygrade, here's a link that you will understand.

Did Kate Middleton Topless Photos Violate French Privacy Laws? - Celebrity Gossip, News & Photos, Movie Reviews, Competitions - Entertainmentwise

French privacy laws are considered to be amongst the strictest in the world, protecting high profile individuals, with top politicians constantly using courts to block the publication of scandalous photos that would be considered harmless by the standards of other countries tabloids.

Thomas Roussineau, a specialist in privacy law, says the French publication Closer had without a doubt violated their country’s privacy laws by publishing images of Middleton on holiday in the South of France.

"It is totally forbidden," he said. "The castle is not the street, it is in a private place, and they are intimate pictures."

But he was very clear that the publication has considered the potential cost of a fine versus the financial gain the topless photos of the duchess would generate for them.

"They will have a big revenue, and the amount of the sentence will not equal the revenue they will make, it will be a very small part of the revenue they will have from these pictures," Roussineau explained.

I assume you'll accept the expert opinion of a French specialist in privacy laws?

Now, how about you answer my question.... make an ass of yourself much?

 

[California Girl]

She does need to gain some weight, but someone's privacy should not be invaded like that. If I was William I would be using my influence to get some people

Her weight is her business. I wonder how liberals would react if it had been Michele Obama? I suspect y'all would be in total meltdown, rightly so. It sickens me that people think this is no big deal.

Um, how much more do you want me to react? Should i have cussed or something?
Like I said, no one's privacy should be invaded this way. And yes she needs to gain weight. Yes, her weight is her issue. But There is a difference in thinking someone should gain weight, because I don't know getting too skinny is a health risk, then calling the first lady a fat cow.
Go have faux outrage at the liberal somewhere else, Cali. I am sorry I didn't fall on the floor when expressing my outrage about the issue.

No, my little stoner pal, I expect you just to get the basic concept that it is actually outrageous for anyone to be photographed when going about their private, lawful business. Her weight is not the discussion, the rights or wrongs of the behavior of the sick individuals who take these photos, and the scum that fuel it, is the issue.

 

[Synthaholic]

She was in a private residence in France... which happens to have some of the strictest privacy laws in the world.

Make an ass of yourself often?

Show us. I think you're just flapping your gums as always.

And while you're at it, show whether these so-called privacy laws that you are pulling out of your ass apply to the French, or anybody on French soil.

Since I know that a link to the actual french law - in the french language - would be above your intellectual paygrade, here's a link that you will understand.

Did Kate Middleton Topless Photos Violate French Privacy Laws? - Celebrity Gossip, News & Photos, Movie Reviews, Competitions - Entertainmentwise

French privacy laws are considered to be amongst the strictest in the world, protecting high profile individuals, with top politicians constantly using courts to block the publication of scandalous photos that would be considered harmless by the standards of other countries tabloids.

Thomas Roussineau, a specialist in privacy law, says the French publication Closer had without a doubt violated their country’s privacy laws by publishing images of Middleton on holiday in the South of France.

"It is totally forbidden," he said. "The castle is not the street, it is in a private place, and they are intimate pictures."

But he was very clear that the publication has considered the potential cost of a fine versus the financial gain the topless photos of the duchess would generate for them.

"They will have a big revenue, and the amount of the sentence will not equal the revenue they will make, it will be a very small part of the revenue they will have from these pictures," Roussineau explained.

I assume you'll accept the expert opinion of a French specialist in privacy laws?

Now, how about you answer my question.... make an ass of yourself much?

A law with no teeth is a useless law.

A law with no teeth is a law that the authorities have no regard for.

 

[Synthaholic]

Her weight is her business. I wonder how liberals would react if it had been Michele Obama? I suspect y'all would be in total meltdown, rightly so. It sickens me that people think this is no big deal.

Um, how much more do you want me to react? Should i have cussed or something?
Like I said, no one's privacy should be invaded this way. And yes she needs to gain weight. Yes, her weight is her issue. But There is a difference in thinking someone should gain weight, because I don't know getting too skinny is a health risk, then calling the first lady a fat cow.
Go have faux outrage at the liberal somewhere else, Cali. I am sorry I didn't fall on the floor when expressing my outrage about the issue.

No, my little stoner pal, I expect you just to get the basic concept that it is actually outrageous for anyone to be photographed when going about their private, lawful business. Her weight is not the discussion, the rights or wrongs of the behavior of the sick individuals who take these photos, and the scum that fuel it, is the issue.

And here it is: the self-important, elitist CowardGirl trying to dictate to everyone else what we are allowed to discuss.

Pathetic.

 

[uscitizen]

The person taking the pics ought to be beaten senseless for takin them.
However people are strange that seeing a boobie is such a sin.
Women will let their children watch entertainment where people are hacked into tiny pieces, screaming all the while. But let their child see a boobie and they run for a cop.
People are screwed up.