Kash Patel says:

Maybe he is someone who ALWAYS carries. Doing so is not unlawful but more importantly is not grounds for our government to just up and shoot "TO KILL". 10 rounds fired, while he's on the ground and AFTER one of the agents took his weapon.

Each one of those rounds were punitive since they certainly were NOT fired in DEFENSE from everything we can see in the video.


How would the agents know that was his only weapon?



.
 
Maybe he is someone who ALWAYS carries. Doing so is not unlawful but more importantly is not grounds for our government to just up and shoot "TO KILL". 10 rounds fired, while he's on the ground and AFTER one of the agents took his weapon.

Each one of those rounds were punitive since they certainly were NOT fired in DEFENSE from everything we can see in the video.
What type of person goes out with a loaded gun on them and fights with LE officers?
 
So Killer Kyle brings a gun he is not supposed to even have and USES IT and that’s ok

Pretti brings a legal gun that remains holstered and he “deserves it”

That’s our MAGA FBI

ICE ICE BABY
Exactly what happened.

If the right is so thoroughly confident that the killings were justified...lets have some trials. I imagine the family will go wrongful death after the DHS white-washes it so we'll likely have some anyway. But it's telling that the feds are in full scale damage control while pretending there was no damage.
 
Why would one carry an unloaded weapon?
Because they are transporting it to a location where use is planned? Or transporting to someone else? Lots of possible reasons, stupid.
That was a stupid question
I agree It WAS a stupid question by you. So why did you ask it?
 
Go fight with a cop while carrying and report back to us.
The victim wasn't fighting. He was defending a woman who was being pushed around. Back in the day ... we called that "chivalry." You know ... back when we weren't living in a Police State.
 
Amen. Things were already insane....but what's even more insane is to now see so-called "conservatives" disregarding the Second Amendment. Or maybe just showing that they were hypocritical about it all along. Because hyperpartisanship. :rolleyes:

To say all this is disappointing would be the biggest understatement.
According to the GOA (of which I'm a paying member), Pam Bondi isn't very pro 2nd Amendment. And, as I recall, Trump (during his first term) suggested the "Red Flag Laws" on national television and even suggested "taking the guns first and worrying about due process later." That was one hell of an admission. He either didn't understand the Constitution or simply didn't care what it said.

GOA = Gun Owners of America

 
Let us guess, all those people that went to the ground slipped and fell, right?

:21:
I saw an agent aggressively approach three people and push them. He literally pushed one non-immigrant, American woman down on the sidewalk. Then he sprayed all of them in the face with pepper spray. Then he tackled the man and threw him to the ground. Then another agent took the man's firearm from the holster in the small of his back. Then an agent pulled a gun and shot the unarmed man several times until he was dead.

Now a bloodthirsty, Neocon, warmonger type would likely cream his jeans if he saw that but us common sense, law-and-order types tend to frown upon witnessing a literal murder take place before our very eyes.
 
Because they are transporting it to a location where use is planned? Or transporting to someone else? Lots of possible reasons, stupid.

I agree It WAS a stupid question by you. So why did you ask it?
Sorry jackass… yours was the stupid question as is your continued nonsense

One doesn’t need a reason to carry. Ask your gun nut friends
 
I saw an agent aggressively approach three people and push them. He literally pushed one non-immigrant, American woman down on the sidewalk. Then he sprayed all of them in the face with pepper spray. Then he tackled the man and threw him to the ground. Then another agent took the man's firearm from the holster in the small of his back. Then an agent pulled a gun and shot the unarmed man several times until he was dead.

Now a bloodthirsty, Neocon, warmonger type would likely cream his jeans if he saw that but us common sense, law-and-order types tend to frown upon witnessing a literal murder take place before our very eyes.
Wait...so now it was a fight?

Lol
 
I saw an agent aggressively approach three people and push them. He literally pushed one non-immigrant, American woman down on the sidewalk. Then he sprayed all of them in the face with pepper spray. Then he tackled the man and threw him to the ground. Then another agent took the man's firearm from the holster in the small of his back. Then an agent pulled a gun and shot the unarmed man several times until he was dead.

Now a bloodthirsty, Neocon, warmonger type would likely cream his jeans if he saw that but us common sense, law-and-order types tend to frown upon witnessing a literal murder take place before our very eyes.
Get your eyes checked.
 
15th post
Are you serious? I carry a gun daily for a potential self defense scenario. What good is an unloaded gun? An unloaded gun is just an expensive rock.
The agent who took the gun must have forgotten to check the safety. Apparently it went off as he was walking away with it.
 
We have trials because someone is dead shit brains....

No, we don't shit for brains. Thousands of dead people every dead. Are you really this Goddamned dumb to not understand that?
 
Back
Top Bottom