Kash Patel says:

"You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple."
Patel is right. If you are going to engage in the sort protest that involves committing federal crimes, it's really bad idea to do it armed. At best it will put a firearms specification on your charges when you FAFO. At worst it could get you killed.

Cops are people too. If you resist arrest while armed they may rightly feel like the struggle is for life or death and act accordingly.

The people who are paying the Democratic party's gullible low IQ brown shirts don't tell them that. They lie to them. They tell them that ICE can't legally arrest them without a warrant and other nonsense.
 
Last edited:

And confront LE. Don't be a dick will take you far in life

1769379280835.webp
 
Neither did Alex Pretti point a gun at law enforcement. Why lie? Are you really that much of a zombie to just repeat the lie you are told to say....without thought or reason and when your eyes can see otherwise?

Zombies like you, are dangerous!!! Imho!
How do you know he didn't? Are you that closed minded? Every video I've seen so far regarding the incident makes it impossible to see what he was doing. He clearly was struggling -- a crime in an of itself -- but you cannot see if he had the gun in his hand, if its the gun that goes off or if an ICE agent pulled the trigger.

There is ZERO evidence that ICE went rogue and just killed him for the fun of it.

Close-minded anti-American clowns like you see things that aren't there so frequently it calls into question your ability to percieve reality.
 
I realize Patel is East Indian so he probably hasn't heard of the American 2nd Amendment to the Constitution. The right to carry "shall not be infringed." I carry every, single day wherever I go. PERIOD. Sorry Kash ... you don't like it ... run along back to that craphole called India.
Wherever he’s from, he’s head of the FBI and if he doesn’t understand the Constituion he needs to step down
 
Everybody climb aboard the excuse train!
 
How do you know he didn't? Are you that closed minded? Every video I've seen so far regarding the incident makes it impossible to see what he was doing. He clearly was struggling -- a crime in an of itself -- but you cannot see if he had the gun in his hand, if its the gun that goes off or if an ICE agent pulled the trigger.

There is ZERO evidence that ICE went rogue and just killed him for the fun of it.

Close-minded anti-American clowns like you see things that aren't there so frequently it calls into question your ability to percieve reality.
His gun was removed well before he was murdered
 
His gun was removed well before he was murdered
Prove it. You cannot. Why make such a blatantly dishonest statement?

And why are you not holding the Minnesota Government and the city government responsbile for their gasoline on the fire in this entire situation?
 
"You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple."


Oh yeah?

View attachment 1211017

Maybe the quiet part is "unless you want to kill leftists"?

You’re right, rittenhouse shouldn’t have had a gun, but then rittenhouse didn’t shoot anyone in a clash with officers, he also didn’t start a confrontation with anyone. He shot people as a reaction to them attacking him
 
"You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple."


Oh yeah?

View attachment 1211017

Maybe the quiet part is "unless you want to kill leftists"?

Funny how when right talk about their guns, they have the Second Amendment.

When they talk about other people's guns, "you can't bring them here".
 
Here's the most reasonable response to the Pretti murder:


Another "We killed someone because we don't know how to do our job properly, so we forced this to escalate and escalate until we felt we had to shoot this person because 'he was coming right at us' (while on the floor)"

These people need to be tried for murder. Because that's what they did.
 
15th post
You’re right, rittenhouse shouldn’t have had a gun, but then rittenhouse didn’t shoot anyone in a clash with officers, he also didn’t start a confrontation with anyone. He shot people as a reaction to them attacking him

So, this kid shot and killed people in a protest. Nothing happened to him.

This other guy did NOTHING. He got pushed by ICE agents who should not have been pushing people. Then they saw a gun this guy WASN'T EVEN USING. And they shot him.

What the ****?
 
Simple question: Why did he bring a loaded gun?

He is going to a peaceful demonstration, the purpose of which is to interfere with law enforcement. Why did be bring the gun? What eventuality did he anticipate?

Serious answers only.
 
So Killer Kyle brings a gun he is not supposed to even have and USES IT and that’s ok

Pretti brings a legal gun that remains holstered and he “deserves it”

That’s our MAGA FBI

ICE ICE BABY
The cognitive dissonance required to be a tRumpling is staggering.
 
Back
Top Bottom