Karl Rove: The Election Will Not be Overturned

Recounts and audits don't change election results when there are minor mistakes of a few hundred ballots. We are talking about deliberate election fraud in the hundreds of thousands. That changes elections.
 
since it hasnt been decided yet whats he talking about

Only in the QAnon universe has it not been decided.
Only an idiot believes the sleepy Joe, Pedo Biden found 12 MILLION votes more than what the Hildebeast got in 2016 and obamamonkey got in 2012. That his infrequent rallies and all the gaffes he made when he did make an appearance "swayed" the masses to show up and or fill out ballots that were not allowed to be inspected....

Sorry, Toro, it reeks from beginning to end and anyone that doesn't have suspicions of voter fraud are either stupid or partisan shills that don't give a fuck about voter integrity. Karl Rove is a neocon and his opinion isn't worth diddly squat. Let's see if the audits and recounts don't show blatant cheating. Regardless of what happens? Pedo Joe doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of "uniting" the country. This cloud of suspicion will remain over that sloped, neanderthal skull of his (that suffers from dementia) coupled with his "pay for play" scandals using his drug-addled, compromised, pedophile son by the Chi-coms that have Biden in their hip pocket....no amount of spin can change that.
That was quite a rant of childish name calling. Did you learn from Trump?
 
Recounts and audits don't change election results when there are minor mistakes of a few hundred ballots. We are talking about deliberate election fraud in the hundreds of thousands. That changes elections.
I understand KY. Is full of votes. Many more than are on the rolls. I hope one of our great Investigative Reporter's go to work on that. A guy who has an apprval rating of 13% and has to hire snipers when he speaks won overwhelmingly.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Biden’s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is “100% within his rights” to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the president’s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Biden’s column, and certainly they’re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governor’s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins aren’t much like today’s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

There is no way to know how many there are until the audits, court cases and investigations are over. Karl Rove is full of crap.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Biden’s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is “100% within his rights” to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the president’s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Biden’s column, and certainly they’re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governor’s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins aren’t much like today’s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

Cool.

I am sure your new hero, Karl Rove won't mind if we do a quick 30-day audit, would he? Just to be sure?
sure, audit away. let the trump campaign pay for it if it is not mandated such as in georgia. insist on advance payment, though.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Biden’s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is “100% within his rights” to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the president’s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Biden’s column, and certainly they’re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governor’s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins aren’t much like today’s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

There is no way to know how many there are until the audits, court cases and investigations are over. Karl Rove is full of crap.
Karl Rove, the latest Rhino!! I am shocked, I tell you, shocked!
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Biden’s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is “100% within his rights” to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the president’s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Biden’s column, and certainly they’re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governor’s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins aren’t much like today’s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so​
You'll probably appreciate this.

An advisor buddy of mine in a nearby state had a good idea: He's been running radio ads for a long time on a news station that carries Limbaugh and Hannity. So yesterday (Wednesday) he changed his ads to include something like "the election means that your income taxes are going up -- come in and let's talk about that!"

Makes sense, playing on the hysteria and paranoia of the Trumpsters. But it backfired on him. When I spoke with him at 4pm, he had had eight or nine furious phone calls from listeners/Trumpsters saying WHO SAYS THE ELECTION IS OVER! WHO WON! YOU DON'T KNOW! THE ELECTION ISN'T OVER! TRUMP WON! I guess one guy called a COUPLE of times.

So he had just called the station to remove the ads and replace them with the old ones. He's worried he's permanently burned a bunch of local bridges now. Just for that.

It would normally be kinda funny, but it isn't.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Biden’s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is “100% within his rights” to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the president’s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Biden’s column, and certainly they’re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governor’s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins aren’t much like today’s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so​
You'll probably appreciate this.

An advisor buddy of mine in a nearby state had a good idea: He's been running radio ads for a long time on a news station that carries Limbaugh and Hannity. So yesterday (Wednesday) he changed his ads to include something like "the election means that your income taxes are going up -- come in and let's talk about that!"

Makes sense, playing on the hysteria and paranoia of the Trumpsters. But it backfired on him. When I spoke with him at 4pm, he had had eight or nine furious phone calls from listeners/Trumpsters saying WHO SAYS THE ELECTION IS OVER! WHO WON! YOU DON'T KNOW! THE ELECTION ISN'T OVER! TRUMP WON! I guess one guy called a COUPLE of times.

So he had just called the station to remove the ads and replace them with the old ones. He's worried he's permanently burned a bunch of local bridges now. Just for that.

It would normally be kinda funny, but it isn't.
This explains why you talk about radio so much.
 
Recounts and audits don't change election results when there are minor mistakes of a few hundred ballots. We are talking about deliberate election fraud in the hundreds of thousands. That changes elections.

And there is no evidence to support that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top