Karl Marx 25 Greatest Quotes!

I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger and all the hooch ya got today .

TuesdayWimpyVulgar.jpg
 
In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.

There is an actual Communist party in America, and they do occasionally even put up candidates in scattered elections, here and there. If you happen to be eligible to vote in an election that has a Communist candidate, then you can certainly vote for that candidate, if you choose.

The Communist party is very small, obscure, and not terribly successful here, not because of any “totalitarian” suppression of it at the hands of government, but because most Americans view Communism as evil, and will not support anything that goes by its name. The true promoters of Communist ideals distance themselves from the name, but align with the Democrapic party, and have contaminated it with these ideals.
 
Last edited:
The true promoters of Communist ideals distance themselves from the name, but align with the Democrapic party, and have contaminated it with these ideals.

You can vote for Bernie.

Exactly. I'm pretty sure that Mr. Sanders never uses the word “Communist” to identify himself or his positions, and probably never openly cites Marx, but nevertheless, he's one of the closest prominent advocates of true Marxist principles.
 
In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.
You assessment of the US is incorrect as their are no laws that suppress voting for someone like Sanders.
What are you educational and professional credentials?

A pretty clear example of the Tainted Tommy syndrome, someone who is abysmally ignorant about the United States pretending he's an expert on us, and feeling qualified to preach to us about how we should run our country.

I guess, after so many years, the syndrome grew to be so big that it could no longer be contained in one user on this forum, so that's how Jackass WANKER Frogbrain and Oz and the Orchestra came to be.
 
i have already quoted a statement he made that ended my nieve and innocent political virginity.

And in that light I can find nothing of intellect concerning his quotes

See earlier post!
to suggest this simple quote should point me right at the "intellectual" post/quote you made "earlier" would be proof that even you think that what you have posted thus far has only one point of intellect concerning Marx...first you employed a typical marxist tactic of intellectual dishonesty which you were called out on, then you were forced to defend an anti-semetic post attributed to Marx, and now you are claiming in all his quotes even you can find only one you consider to be intellectual [and that may have been when you were 12 and admittedly didn't know any better] your thread is unraveling bro.
I was not studying politics at the time but cosmology. Nothing I had ever studied including Catholicism explained a theory of everything, but Marx's quote put me on the path in how to evaluate information. I may not have exactly quoted him word for word. It is 50 odd years since I read it but I'm sure I got the jist.

I have never understood how Americans asses information and since entering this site I am even more at a loss to understand. Do you for example think the same people who caused 9/11 are the same people who killed JFK simply because they seem anti-American, you don't like them and thus they must be. You have probably never seen some of the stately homes built in Britain during the Industrial revolution, at the same time conditions for workers were deplorable - 'Blake's Dark Satanic Mill'. That was the world Marx lived in, and though his remedy Communism seems extreme and goes against human nature he did at least influence the idea of workers uniting through Trade Unions and demanding changes that in Britain resulted in the Labour party taking power in 1923, The Welfare State - social assistance from cradle to grave, and the NHS medical assistance free at the point of need..
Socialism tempered Capitalism's wild excesses and if anything saved it from Communism.

It just seemed to me if Americans took the trouble to study Marx, taking into account the conditions of his time they might not be so quick to dis him.
Unfortunately I didn't check the material I was posting!
 
In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.
You assessment of the US is incorrect as their are no laws that suppress voting for someone like Sanders.
What are you educational and professional credentials?

A pretty clear example of the Tainted Tommy syndrome, someone who is abysmally ignorant about the United States pretending he's an expert on us, and feeling qualified to preach to us about how we should run our country.

I guess, after so many years, the syndrome grew to be so big that it could no longer be contained in one user on this forum, so that's how Jackass WANKER Frogbrain and Oz and the Orchestra came to be.
Sadly.....Just the usual brain dead verbal diarrhea without making any attempt to asses, rationalize, balance or seriously debate information.
You should have put WANKER in bold type, it might make an impact!
NOT!
 
i have already quoted a statement he made that ended my nieve and innocent political virginity.

And in that light I can find nothing of intellect concerning his quotes

See earlier post!
to suggest this simple quote should point me right at the "intellectual" post/quote you made "earlier" would be proof that even you think that what you have posted thus far has only one point of intellect concerning Marx...first you employed a typical marxist tactic of intellectual dishonesty which you were called out on, then you were forced to defend an anti-semetic post attributed to Marx, and now you are claiming in all his quotes even you can find only one you consider to be intellectual [and that may have been when you were 12 and admittedly didn't know any better] your thread is unraveling bro.
I was not studying politics at the time but cosmology. Nothing I had ever studied including Catholicism explained a theory of everything, but Marx's quote put me on the path in how to evaluate information.
and yet you end this post trying to justify the information you have so far provided with this nugget...
Unfortunately I didn't check the material I was posting!
Is that what you learned "on the path to evaluating information"?, it took the non-marxists to do that for you

I may not have exactly quoted him word for word. It is 50 odd years since I read it but I'm sure I got the jist.
Marxism is your religion, it has to be preached and when contradicted defended, it can have no opposition as your quotes make clear

I have never understood how Americans asses information and since entering this site I am even more at a loss to understand.
sounds like you suffer from an overdoes of media poisoning.

Do you for example think the same people who caused 9/11 are the same people who killed JFK simply because they seem anti-American, you don't like them and thus they must be.
There are so many incorrect claims and assumptions here and so much baggage to unload it is difficult to figure out where to begin and where there may actually be an ending and this is all intentional so it can be iced over with marxist accusation, the signature fingerprint of marxist ideology

You have probably never seen some of the stately homes built in Britain during the Industrial revolution, at the same time conditions for workers were deplorable - 'Blake's Dark Satanic Mill'. That was the world Marx lived in, and though his remedy Communism seems extreme and goes against human nature he did at least influence the idea of workers uniting through Trade Unions and demanding changes that in Britain resulted in the Labour party taking power in 1923, The Welfare State - social assistance from cradle to grave, and the NHS medical assistance free at the point of need..
Socialism tempered Capitalism's wild excesses and if anything saved it from Communism.
I agree with the workers getting shafted, but why did they join the industrial revolution? were they better off before it? And you end with a rather odd chain of events, that socialism may not be as much of an economic system as it is a sentry against communism!?

It just seemed to me if Americans took the trouble to study Marx, taking into account the conditions of his time they might not be so quick to dis him.
Unfortunately I didn't check the material I was posting!
It seems to me that most of the anti-marxists here knew more about marx than was actually good for you[/QUOTE]
 
Though I am not a communist I've always viewed Karl Marx in the same light as Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, though far more intellectual.

I think that it is clear enough that if you're not truly a Communist, then you are, at least, much, much, much closer to being one than you are to being a Christian, a Muslim, or a Buddhist.
With all three there is no "close to being one" - you either are or your not!

Having said that there is nothing wrong with studying their work or accepting some of their
teachings.

Have you ever read the Koran?

Mohammed when asked his definition of god:-
"God is beyond all human comprehension"!
Makes perfect sense to me!

"Women must be treated with kindness and respect"!
Do you disagree?

"Forgiveness is far more important than punishment!"
Seems perfectly reasonable!
Quotes Mohammed.

I doubt if Marx himself would want to put his name to the USSR or China and would have adapted his views accordingly over time. We all change over time!
 
I can't think of a single successful Marxist nation. Not a one, not once ever in human history
China is doing pretty well!
Wait! China is Marxist?! Are you retarded?
Well loosely.............Marxist not retarded of course Ha ha ha!
China is a Totalitarian nation...there is no "According to one's needs".
Do you not think or realize perhaps that Totalitarianism is merely a state of mind?
You are either psychotic or incredibly stupid.
On the other hand, perhaps, Regulated Capitalism is merely a state of mind.
In the USSR you could vote in elections but all candidates were communist. You could not vote for a capitalist.

In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.

Thus both systems are Totalitarian!
You assessment of the US is incorrect as their are no laws that suppress voting for someone like Sanders.
What are you educational and professional credentials?
You yanks need to understand when you grossly exaggerate and call every liberal, socialist and the likes of Sanders a communist you lose all credibility and will not be taken seriously.

In the UK we are a bit too savvi to swallow that shit.
I have never understood why you are so terrified of anything to the left of Hitler you label everything commie. Try being fair and reasonable in debate and stop calling someone a communist when you know full well they are not!
The UK...You worship a Queen who's sole talent is waving her right hand.
The only think the UK has given the world in since the late 1990s is remastered Beatles outtakes.
 
i have already quoted a statement he made that ended my nieve and innocent political virginity.

And in that light I can find nothing of intellect concerning his quotes

See earlier post!
to suggest this simple quote should point me right at the "intellectual" post/quote you made "earlier" would be proof that even you think that what you have posted thus far has only one point of intellect concerning Marx...first you employed a typical marxist tactic of intellectual dishonesty which you were called out on, then you were forced to defend an anti-semetic post attributed to Marx, and now you are claiming in all his quotes even you can find only one you consider to be intellectual [and that may have been when you were 12 and admittedly didn't know any better] your thread is unraveling bro.
I was not studying politics at the time but cosmology. Nothing I had ever studied including Catholicism explained a theory of everything, but Marx's quote put me on the path in how to evaluate information. I may not have exactly quoted him word for word. It is 50 odd years since I read it but I'm sure I got the jist.

I have never understood how Americans asses information and since entering this site I am even more at a loss to understand. Do you for example think the same people who caused 9/11 are the same people who killed JFK simply because they seem anti-American, you don't like them and thus they must be. You have probably never seen some of the stately homes built in Britain during the Industrial revolution, at the same time conditions for workers were deplorable - 'Blake's Dark Satanic Mill'. That was the world Marx lived in, and though his remedy Communism seems extreme and goes against human nature he did at least influence the idea of workers uniting through Trade Unions and demanding changes that in Britain resulted in the Labour party taking power in 1923, The Welfare State - social assistance from cradle to grave, and the NHS medical assistance free at the point of need..
Socialism tempered Capitalism's wild excesses and if anything saved it from Communism.

It just seemed to me if Americans took the trouble to study Marx, taking into account the conditions of his time they might not be so quick to dis him.
Unfortunately I didn't check the material I was posting!
What service or product do you produce besides posting?
 
Marx was a dangerous combination of 19th century philosopher and economist. Ironically he was part of the ruling class in Germany himself. His anti-capitalist views of society in the mid 19th century were based on the 18th century chaos of insane local kings and incoherent policies which had been going on for over a hundred years among the Germanic tribes. Marx died in 1883 so he never was able to understand the unlimited possibilities of a free capitalist system. Marx's antiquated 18th century socialist utopia insanity was embraced in Russia and later modified in Nazi Germany in the late 19th and early 20th century. How did it work out?
 
Marx's main intellectual contribution was to explain why Capitalism, Socialism and Communism are a vicious cycle.
Communism worked quite well in Israel for 50 years but they knew when it's time had come and gone.
 
I can't think of a single successful Marxist nation. Not a one, not once ever in human history
China is doing pretty well!
Wait! China is Marxist?! Are you retarded?
Well loosely.............Marxist not retarded of course Ha ha ha!
China is a Totalitarian nation...there is no "According to one's needs".
Do you not think or realize perhaps that Totalitarianism is merely a state of mind?
You are either psychotic or incredibly stupid.
On the other hand, perhaps, Regulated Capitalism is merely a state of mind.
In the USSR you could vote in elections but all candidates were communist. You could not vote for a capitalist.

In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.

Thus both systems are Totalitarian!
You assessment of the US is incorrect as their are no laws that suppress voting for someone like Sanders.
What are you educational and professional credentials?
You yanks need to understand when you grossly exaggerate and call every liberal, socialist and the likes of Sanders a communist you lose all credibility and will not be taken seriously.

In the UK we are a bit too savvi to swallow that shit.
I have never understood why you are so terrified of anything to the left of Hitler you label everything commie. Try being fair and reasonable in debate and stop calling someone a communist when you know full well they are not!
The UK...You worship a Queen who's sole talent is waving her right hand.
The only think the UK has given the world in since the late 1990s is remastered Beatles outtakes.
Her Majesty....Is Head of State, politically neutral & head of the Church of England.
I doubt many British Catholics, Muslims, Jews worship the Queen. Or Protestants for that matter. She is however head of the armed forces who swear an oath to her ensuring no government can ever go to war without her approval!
 
I can't think of a single successful Marxist nation. Not a one, not once ever in human history
China is doing pretty well!
Wait! China is Marxist?! Are you retarded?
Well loosely.............Marxist not retarded of course Ha ha ha!
China is a Totalitarian nation...there is no "According to one's needs".
Do you not think or realize perhaps that Totalitarianism is merely a state of mind?
You are either psychotic or incredibly stupid.
On the other hand, perhaps, Regulated Capitalism is merely a state of mind.
In the USSR you could vote in elections but all candidates were communist. You could not vote for a capitalist.

In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.

Thus both systems are Totalitarian!
You assessment of the US is incorrect as their are no laws that suppress voting for someone like Sanders.
What are you educational and professional credentials?
You yanks need to understand when you grossly exaggerate and call every liberal, socialist and the likes of Sanders a communist you lose all credibility and will not be taken seriously.

In the UK we are a bit too savvi to swallow that shit.
I have never understood why you are so terrified of anything to the left of Hitler you label everything commie. Try being fair and reasonable in debate and stop calling someone a communist when you know full well they are not!
The UK...You worship a Queen who's sole talent is waving her right hand.
The only think the UK has given the world in since the late 1990s is remastered Beatles outtakes.
Her Majesty....Is Head of State, politically neutral & head of the Church of England.
I doubt many British Catholics, Muslims, Jews worship the Queen. Or Protestants for that matter. She is however head of the armed forces who swear an oath to her ensuring no government can ever go to war without her approval!
The UK going to war...yeeaah...
She's a trillionaire who's waves "Hello!"
She's a uslesss pos.
 
When will you yanks educate yourselves? Nazi's didn't come into being until after WWI.
Hitler named them because he wanted to attract working class socialists. He also chose their swastika symbol taken from both Hindu & Roman symbolism.
'Socialist' just means society. It is the Nationalist aspect that defines them as extreme right.
As opposed to Marxism that is International and left wing.

Google a definition of Nazi - all without exception will define them as extreme right!
 
I can't think of a single successful Marxist nation. Not a one, not once ever in human history
China is doing pretty well!
Wait! China is Marxist?! Are you retarded?
Well loosely.............Marxist not retarded of course Ha ha ha!
China is a Totalitarian nation...there is no "According to one's needs".
Do you not think or realize perhaps that Totalitarianism is merely a state of mind?
You are either psychotic or incredibly stupid.
On the other hand, perhaps, Regulated Capitalism is merely a state of mind.
In the USSR you could vote in elections but all candidates were communist. You could not vote for a capitalist.

In the US you can vote but all the candidates are capitalist, you can not vote for a communist.

Thus both systems are Totalitarian!
You assessment of the US is incorrect as their are no laws that suppress voting for someone like Sanders.
What are you educational and professional credentials?
You yanks need to understand when you grossly exaggerate and call every liberal, socialist and the likes of Sanders a communist you lose all credibility and will not be taken seriously.

In the UK we are a bit too savvi to swallow that shit.
I have never understood why you are so terrified of anything to the left of Hitler you label everything commie. Try being fair and reasonable in debate and stop calling someone a communist when you know full well they are not!
The UK...You worship a Queen who's sole talent is waving her right hand.
The only think the UK has given the world in since the late 1990s is remastered Beatles outtakes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top