Kamala will be a generational leader...

[basquebromance]

“She’s Dangerous”: GOP Insiders Fear Kamala Could Be the Next Obama

Rattled by her deft vivisection of Joe Biden at the last debate, Republicans wonder how Harris might do against a real villain like Trump. “She doesn’t come across as a nutjob,” worries one GOP operative. “Kamala is a nightmare,” says another.

www.vanityfair.com

excerpts from the article:

Rattled by her deft vivisection of Joe Biden at the last debate, Republicans wonder how Harris might do against a real villain like Trump. “She doesn’t come across as a nutjob,” worries one GOP operative. “Kamala is a nightmare,” says another.

“I think she’s dangerous, and probably maybe the most dangerous, from our view,” a veteran Republican political consultant told me this month. “She theoretically would do very well with African American turnout and end up being positioned as a Vienna Soccer Mom.” In case you’re wondering, that’s Vienna, Virginia, an upscale bedroom community just west of Washington, D.C., that has accelerated its drift from the Republican orbit since a certain former reality-television star secured the Republican nomination three years ago. Suburbs just like it in critical battlegrounds could hand the White House back to the Democratic Party in 2020.

Not everyone buys the idea that Harris is the next Obama, superficial similarities aside. “She’s overrated,” says a Republican grandee who still has battle scars from run-ins with the 44th president. “Obama had authenticity. She doesn’t.” Another Republican strategist who doesn’t buy the the hype called Harris “terrible” and “a disaster.”

But some dialed-in Republicans described Harris as a serious threat. “I have long been most concerned about Harris. I think she has an appeal to the Scottsdale soccer mom who is a registered Republican. Between her appeal and Trump’s women problems, she has probably already won those voters,” said an experienced Republican consultant in Arizona, an emerging battleground that sent a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2018 for the first time in a generation and is ground zero for suburban discontent with Trump. “But I also think she does better amongst Independents who generally split ideologically in Arizona,” this GOP insider added. “Independents are just sick of everything, and her no-nonsense approach would have appeal broadly, and even to some white Independent and GOP men. She doesn’t have the Biden wimp factor, and that’s probably important in a place like Arizona.”

Imagine what Harris might be able to do against a real villain like Trump, some worried Republican insiders back in Washington were simultaneously telling me via text message. Hillary Clinton, unlikable, clunky, and corrupt, could never do that. “Kamala is a nightmare” for Republicans, one of them told me.

 

[basquebromance]

so who is Kamala VP's gonna be? Speaker Pelosi?

 

[Indeependent]

She was probably a great whore for Brown.

Such a classy individual you are....not.

KH giving blowjobs was classy?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Asian? She is Indian-Jamaican. or Indo-Jamaican. She is in no way African-American.

Harris is the second African American woman and the first Indian American to serve in the United States Senate.

Kamala Harris - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

hey billy how come they took all the negative shit out of the wiki article?....

 

[Missouri_Mike]

She was probably a great whore for Brown.

Such a classy individual you are....not.

KH giving blowjobs was classy?

Apparently mentioning it is not. Go figure.

 

[conserveguy877]

Wow!

 

[Fang]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024 and then in 2028. Looking at voter trends you will realize that after 2020 it will be virtually impossible for gop to win again, identity politics is working against them, trump made the party the one of the disenfranchised poorly educated anglos, and hate group members, which is a losing proposition, with no chance against a super articulate and intelligent asian-african american like Kamala...

No doubt she was chosen, in part, because of her gender and skin color. However she is still a good choice. It’s a shame she would only debate Pence because she would mop the floor with Trump.

“No doubt she was chosen, in part, because of her gender and skin color”

Really? She was totally chosen because of her gender and skin color. LOL Kamala is an affirmative action pick and Joe Biden is a racist.

 

[excalibur]

 

[Fang]

Wow!

Good ad. It’s 100% true. Joe Biden is a racist.

 

[excalibur]

“She’s Dangerous”: GOP Insiders Fear Kamala Could Be the Next Obama

Rattled by her deft vivisection of Joe Biden at the last debate, Republicans wonder how Harris might do against a real villain like Trump. “She doesn’t come across as a nutjob,” worries one GOP operative. “Kamala is a nightmare,” says another.

www.vanityfair.com

excerpts from the article:

Rattled by her deft vivisection of Joe Biden at the last debate, Republicans wonder how Harris might do against a real villain like Trump. “She doesn’t come across as a nutjob,” worries one GOP operative. “Kamala is a nightmare,” says another.

“I think she’s dangerous, and probably maybe the most dangerous, from our view,” a veteran Republican political consultant told me this month. “She theoretically would do very well with African American turnout and end up being positioned as a Vienna Soccer Mom.” In case you’re wondering, that’s Vienna, Virginia, an upscale bedroom community just west of Washington, D.C., that has accelerated its drift from the Republican orbit since a certain former reality-television star secured the Republican nomination three years ago. Suburbs just like it in critical battlegrounds could hand the White House back to the Democratic Party in 2020.

Not everyone buys the idea that Harris is the next Obama, superficial similarities aside. “She’s overrated,” says a Republican grandee who still has battle scars from run-ins with the 44th president. “Obama had authenticity. She doesn’t.” Another Republican strategist who doesn’t buy the the hype called Harris “terrible” and “a disaster.”

But some dialed-in Republicans described Harris as a serious threat. “I have long been most concerned about Harris. I think she has an appeal to the Scottsdale soccer mom who is a registered Republican. Between her appeal and Trump’s women problems, she has probably already won those voters,” said an experienced Republican consultant in Arizona, an emerging battleground that sent a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2018 for the first time in a generation and is ground zero for suburban discontent with Trump. “But I also think she does better amongst Independents who generally split ideologically in Arizona,” this GOP insider added. “Independents are just sick of everything, and her no-nonsense approach would have appeal broadly, and even to some white Independent and GOP men. She doesn’t have the Biden wimp factor, and that’s probably important in a place like Arizona.”

Imagine what Harris might be able to do against a real villain like Trump, some worried Republican insiders back in Washington were simultaneously telling me via text message. Hillary Clinton, unlikable, clunky, and corrupt, could never do that. “Kamala is a nightmare” for Republicans, one of them told me.

Vanity Fair?

Tulsi Gabbard sliced and diced Harris.

 

[excalibur]

A generational leader you say? How? I want specifics. Not your opinion.

So generational that she got no support in the primaries. Generation Zero.

 

[the other mike]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024

If Biden wins I believe states will start seceding starting with Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Florida.

 

[Oddball]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024 and then in 2028. Looking at voter trends you will realize that after 2020 it will be virtually impossible for gop to win again, identity politics is working against them, trump made the party the one of the disenfranchised poorly educated anglos, and hate group members, which is a losing proposition, with no chance against a super articulate and intelligent asian-african american like Kamala...

You liberoidal schmucks have been making the "demographics" argument since the Clintoon years...Not tired of being proved wrong yet areya?

The demographic argument is correct.

Where he is wrong is that America will allow the change to continue. Obviously, as with any invasion, there will be resistance, probably sooner rather than later. The whole nation will break in a decade or two. At that point this idiot will be living in his utopia a shithole.

The demographics argument is incorrect,, and makes the racist presumption that political leanings are nothing more than a product of skin pigmentation....Yet another reveal that the Democrat Party is still the home of racism.

 

[Oddball]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024 and then in 2028. Looking at voter trends you will realize that after 2020 it will be virtually impossible for gop to win again, identity politics is working against them, trump made the party the one of the disenfranchised poorly educated anglos, and hate group members, which is a losing proposition, with no chance against a super articulate and intelligent asian-african american like Kamala...

I wonda if dat ho gonna be giving out blow jobs and screwin all of DC now.

 

[basquebromance]

“She’s Dangerous”: GOP Insiders Fear Kamala Could Be the Next Obama

Rattled by her deft vivisection of Joe Biden at the last debate, Republicans wonder how Harris might do against a real villain like Trump. “She doesn’t come across as a nutjob,” worries one GOP operative. “Kamala is a nightmare,” says another.

www.vanityfair.com

excerpts from the article:

Rattled by her deft vivisection of Joe Biden at the last debate, Republicans wonder how Harris might do against a real villain like Trump. “She doesn’t come across as a nutjob,” worries one GOP operative. “Kamala is a nightmare,” says another.

“I think she’s dangerous, and probably maybe the most dangerous, from our view,” a veteran Republican political consultant told me this month. “She theoretically would do very well with African American turnout and end up being positioned as a Vienna Soccer Mom.” In case you’re wondering, that’s Vienna, Virginia, an upscale bedroom community just west of Washington, D.C., that has accelerated its drift from the Republican orbit since a certain former reality-television star secured the Republican nomination three years ago. Suburbs just like it in critical battlegrounds could hand the White House back to the Democratic Party in 2020.

Not everyone buys the idea that Harris is the next Obama, superficial similarities aside. “She’s overrated,” says a Republican grandee who still has battle scars from run-ins with the 44th president. “Obama had authenticity. She doesn’t.” Another Republican strategist who doesn’t buy the the hype called Harris “terrible” and “a disaster.”

But some dialed-in Republicans described Harris as a serious threat. “I have long been most concerned about Harris. I think she has an appeal to the Scottsdale soccer mom who is a registered Republican. Between her appeal and Trump’s women problems, she has probably already won those voters,” said an experienced Republican consultant in Arizona, an emerging battleground that sent a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2018 for the first time in a generation and is ground zero for suburban discontent with Trump. “But I also think she does better amongst Independents who generally split ideologically in Arizona,” this GOP insider added. “Independents are just sick of everything, and her no-nonsense approach would have appeal broadly, and even to some white Independent and GOP men. She doesn’t have the Biden wimp factor, and that’s probably important in a place like Arizona.”

Imagine what Harris might be able to do against a real villain like Trump, some worried Republican insiders back in Washington were simultaneously telling me via text message. Hillary Clinton, unlikable, clunky, and corrupt, could never do that. “Kamala is a nightmare” for Republicans, one of them told me.

Vanity Fair?

Tulsi Gabbard sliced and diced Harris.

on twitter

Vanity Fair has 5M followers

Tulsi has 800K

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You know, For the life of me, I could never even IMAGINE being so utterly stupid as to think the only important thing in the world is a person's identity.


We really do seem to be entering our idiocracy earlier than I ever thought possibe.

 

[Norman]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024 and then in 2028. Looking at voter trends you will realize that after 2020 it will be virtually impossible for gop to win again, identity politics is working against them, trump made the party the one of the disenfranchised poorly educated anglos, and hate group members, which is a losing proposition, with no chance against a super articulate and intelligent asian-african american like Kamala...

You liberoidal schmucks have been making the "demographics" argument since the Clintoon years...Not tired of being proved wrong yet areya?

The demographic argument is correct.

Where he is wrong is that America will allow the change to continue. Obviously, as with any invasion, there will be resistance, probably sooner rather than later. The whole nation will break in a decade or two. At that point this idiot will be living in his utopia a shithole.

The demographics argument is incorrect,, and makes the racist presumption that political leanings are nothing more than a product of skin pigmentation....Yet another reveal that the Democrat Party is still the home of racism.

The demographic argument does not make the presumption that political leanings are nothing more than the product of skin color.

Your argument makes the assumption that political leanings are based on magic dirt. If a socialist moves here, by the virtue of American soil he is transformed into a freedom loving American, and forgets about his socialist ways. This is blatantly incorrect.

Theorizing about what we can observe is foolish. The data very clearly shows that voting against American values is closely tied to demographics. Blacks vote over 90% democrats and Hispanics or Latinos do not come much behind. Even Asians vote against America. They all have their reasons, be it free gibs, be it that freedom does not suit them, or be it that they simply dislike being the minority and would rather make the rules for us.

 

[Oddball]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024 and then in 2028. Looking at voter trends you will realize that after 2020 it will be virtually impossible for gop to win again, identity politics is working against them, trump made the party the one of the disenfranchised poorly educated anglos, and hate group members, which is a losing proposition, with no chance against a super articulate and intelligent asian-african american like Kamala...

You liberoidal schmucks have been making the "demographics" argument since the Clintoon years...Not tired of being proved wrong yet areya?

The demographic argument is correct.

Where he is wrong is that America will allow the change to continue. Obviously, as with any invasion, there will be resistance, probably sooner rather than later. The whole nation will break in a decade or two. At that point this idiot will be living in his utopia a shithole.

The demographics argument is incorrect,, and makes the racist presumption that political leanings are nothing more than a product of skin pigmentation....Yet another reveal that the Democrat Party is still the home of racism.

The demographic argument does not make the presumption that political leanings are nothing more than the product of skin color.

Your argument makes the assumption that political leanings are based on the magic ground. If a socialist moves here, by the virtue of American soil he is tranformed into a freedom loving American, and forget about his socialist ways. This is blatantly incorrect.

Theorizing about what we can observe is foolish. The data very clearly shows that voting against American values is closely tied to demographics.

Then why is Trump polling better with blacks than any republican before him?

According to the racist demographics argument that sees only skin color, they should nearly all hate his guts.

 

[Norman]

You know, For the life of me, I could never even IMAGINE being so utterly stupid as to think the only important thing in the world is a person's identity.


We really do seem to be entering our idiocracy earlier than I ever thought possibe.

It was stupid to let so many people in who have any other than the "American" identity.

In any war between two nations, identity is the deciding factor while nothing else matters. This is where we are headed. Two (or more) nations in one.

 

[Norman]

most people agree Biden will be a one term president, and Kamala will pick up the baton in 2024 and then in 2028. Looking at voter trends you will realize that after 2020 it will be virtually impossible for gop to win again, identity politics is working against them, trump made the party the one of the disenfranchised poorly educated anglos, and hate group members, which is a losing proposition, with no chance against a super articulate and intelligent asian-african american like Kamala...

You liberoidal schmucks have been making the "demographics" argument since the Clintoon years...Not tired of being proved wrong yet areya?

The demographic argument is correct.

Where he is wrong is that America will allow the change to continue. Obviously, as with any invasion, there will be resistance, probably sooner rather than later. The whole nation will break in a decade or two. At that point this idiot will be living in his utopia a shithole.

The demographics argument is incorrect,, and makes the racist presumption that political leanings are nothing more than a product of skin pigmentation....Yet another reveal that the Democrat Party is still the home of racism.

The demographic argument does not make the presumption that political leanings are nothing more than the product of skin color.

Your argument makes the assumption that political leanings are based on the magic ground. If a socialist moves here, by the virtue of American soil he is tranformed into a freedom loving American, and forget about his socialist ways. This is blatantly incorrect.

Theorizing about what we can observe is foolish. The data very clearly shows that voting against American values is closely tied to demographics.

Then why is Trump polling better with blacks than any republican before him?

According to the racist demographics argument that sees only skin color, they should nearly all hate his guts.

So president Trump can get 20% of the blacks instead of 10%. The best president can get 20% when going against a child sniffer who does not know where he is. And?

The overwhelming amount of blacks clearly do not want American values, and do not want to vote for American values. They will never agree with you as a group. That is the demographic argument and it is factually correct.