Kamala uses TELEPROMPTER at Town Hall!

[White 6]

And boom! Out with the racism crap.

NO, I do not have anything against black people. My objection is when they are picked over better-qualified whites, or, in this case, are picked for a job where it is announced ahead of time that whites will be excluded from consideration. And when you add in female, then you have the winning combo: Female Black. THAT was the primary qualification for VP.

And thus, look what the Dems were struck with: an idiot who can’t even answer a basic question. That is the risk when you select people with skin color and gender are the primary factors.

So to be clear, the reason I brought up her being a Female Black is because THAT was the requirement for VP - merit a distant second, obviously - and this is the result.

You brought it up in bullet numbers as if important "1) she’s a female black"
No it isn't a requirement for vice president. I have read the constitution, and it isn't there. Plus neither of the two running for president have a black VP running mate. I actually think it is just your partisan thinking.

 

[sealybobo]

what makes you think Trump is mad about it? Everytime she opens her month people dislike her more and more.

Nonsense. Stop pretending you know how independents are going to vote. Stop ignoring how many Mitt Romney's and Dick Chaney's are out there. Quit ignoring this is the first general election since Trump overturned Roe. You're toast and it's annoying to me right now because I can't prove what's GOING to happen in November.

You'll see. Yea I'm nervous but the polls are going to say it's close. They don't see the pro choice blue wave that's coming.

 

[struth]

Nonsense. Stop pretending you know how independents are going to vote. Stop ignoring how many Mitt Romney's and Dick Chaney's are out there. Quit ignoring this is the first general election since Trump overturned Roe. You're toast and it's annoying to me right now because I can't prove what's GOING to happen in November.

You'll see. Yea I'm nervous but the polls are going to say it's close. They don't see the pro choice blue wave that's coming.

We look at polls to get an idea:

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

Oh, you thought if it was talking about Kamala using teleprompter, nobody should mention her opponent, DJT using one.
Nope. You are wrong. That isn't how it works in an Election 2024 thread.

For clarification, the opening post does not mention Trump. Bringing someone else into the discussion is considered being off topic. It doesn't matter if it's a political thread, election thread, Palestine thread, etc - bringing another topic into a particular thread is considered being off topic. People are free to start a thread about the person they want to discuss.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

Thread topic is about Kamala Harris using a teleprompter to answer questions at a town hall.
Trump is NOT the topic! If you want to discuss Trump, start a thread!

 

[22lcidw]

Nonsense. Stop pretending you know how independents are going to vote. Stop ignoring how many Mitt Romney's and Dick Chaney's are out there. Quit ignoring this is the first general election since Trump overturned Roe. You're toast and it's annoying to me right now because I can't prove what's GOING to happen in November.

You'll see. Yea I'm nervous but the polls are going to say it's close. They don't see the pro choice blue wave that's coming.

You keep slapping Republicans around. Since they do nothing back, it feels good. If they lose this election, I gotta figure why keep voting for them. The elites keep putting many of the same shills under their control as candidates. Real hardliners need to start running in local elections and expanding. They will work with the shills until they control the party in a period of years. And there are many elected Republicans who take the brunt of smearing who are not shills who are good people also.

 

[sealybobo]

We look at polls to get an idea:

Globalist media tells you things aren't going well for the labor candidate? Shocker.

 

[Lisa558]

You brought it up in bullet numbers as if important "1) she’s a female black"
No it isn't a requirement for vice president. I have read the constitution, and it isn't there. Plus neither of the two running for president have a black VP running mate. I actually think it is just your partisan thinking.

And I explained why: she was picked for identity politics instead of merit. And she demonstrates IN SPADES why you don’t exclude 94% of the population for consideration because you value being a Black Female more than competence.

And NO, it isn’t a requirement for VP, but Biden said it was a requirement. He announced he was excluding from consideration ANY white, and any black male.

And this is why the Dems had no choice but to run Harris. If Dems weren’t so racist and sexist, Biden could have picked a competent VP, and you’d be in a lot better shape right now.

 

[sealybobo]

You keep slapping Republicans around. Since they do nothing back, it feels good. If they lose this election, I gotta figure why keep voting for them. The elites keep putting many of the same shills under their control as candidates. Real hardliners need to start running in local elections and expanding. They will work with the shills until they control the party in a period of years. And there are many elected Republicans who take the brunt of smearing who are not shills who are good people also.

Only one problem. Republicans NEVER have to change their bad behaviors. Take for example abortion. From what we are hearing, women may have already forgiven and forgotten what Trump did to their reproductive rights.

But I don't buy that for a second. I think Kamala is the next POTUS but I won't rest until she is.

Anyways, think about how bad Bush 1 was and how great Clinton was. Did Republicans change? Nope. They just waited for voters to forget how bad they are. In fact, we stupidly put Bush 2 in after 8 great years of Democratic president. What were we thinking?

And after 8 years of a decent economy, we didn't go with Hillary like we should have. And that worked out just as well as Bush did.

Now we see voters have forgotten how bad things were under Trump. Because he lies and tells you how great things were. No they weren't. 2.3% gdp. Pathetic. After those historic tax breaks? And he lost 400,000 manufacturing jobs.

 

[struth]

Globalist media tells you things aren't going well for the labor candidate? Shocker.

labor? haha this isn't the UK, she the Dembot candiate.

 

[sealybobo]

labor? haha this isn't the UK, she the Dembot candiate.

Unions/labor won big last year with Biden's help. Trump talked about firing workers who strike.

If Trump wins, I hope the first thing he does is break unions both public and private. Make it illegal to strike. Take their teeth out. And companies can fire union workers. Right to work baby!

 

[struth]

Unions/labor won big last year with Biden's help. Trump talked about firing workers who strike.

If Trump wins, I hope the first thing he does is break unions both public and private. Make it illegal to strike. Take their teeth out. And companies can fire union workers. Right to work baby!

what did they win? and XIden isn't running....

Well the President can unilaterally make law, more over it is illegally for Federal unions to strike 5 U.S.C. §7311,

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

 

[struth]

The "joy" is gone with Harris.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

 

[White 6]

Thread topic is about Kamala Harris using a teleprompter to answer questions at a town hall.
Trump is NOT the topic! If you want to discuss Trump, start a thread!

In an election year, in an election thread, protecting a hit piece based on naming one candidate, when the other candidate does same or similar, so is not to be mentioned is shamefully partisan, and this board was not meant to be partisan, in and of itself.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

In an election year, in an election thread, protecting a hit piece based on naming one candidate, when the other candidate does same or similar, so is not to be mentioned is shamefully partisan, and this board was not meant to be partisan, in and of itself.

Kamala Harris is the thread topic. Read that sentence however many times it takes to understand that bringing up another person that was not mentioned in the opening post is considered being off topic and/or disrupting the thread.

 

[d0gbreath]

And boom! Out with the racism crap.

NO, I do not have anything against black people. My objection is when they are picked over better-qualified whites, or, in this case, are picked for a job where it is announced ahead of time that whites will be excluded from consideration. And when you add in female, then you have the winning combo: Female Black. THAT was the primary qualification for VP.

And thus, look what the Dems were struck with: an idiot who can’t even answer a basic question. That is the risk when you select people with skin color and gender are the primary factors.

So to be clear, the reason I brought up her being a Female Black is because THAT was the requirement for VP - merit a distant second, obviously - and this is the result.

Nope, that still sounds racist. Do you have a black friend? Several?