Kamala supports NO RESTRICTIONS on abortion

[JoeMoma]

That it was.

States across the country are adopting Constitutional amendments that basically take all restrictions away

At the same time, democrats convince people that they have lost their abortion rights so they should vote for Kamala to save them, even though abortion numbers have increased since the Dobbs decision

Simply incredible as they have their cake and eat it too.

I've never been able to eat cake that I didn't have.

 

[JoeMoma]

Hypothetical Question: Should a person be put to death if it's determined that he was conceived due to his father raping his mother?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

She is such a motherfucking liar.

What freedoms have been removed from the women of California, for example?

It is a state issue. “THE WOMEN OF AMERICA” haven’t lost shit.

Plus, WHAT IS A WOMAN?

You don't know?
No worries.
Either does your dear leader.

 

[DBA]

Good for her.

Abortion is a very painful personal decision and the government needs to keep the fuck out of it.

Sorry, but most people in a civilized society don’t believe in giving a woman carte blanche authority to kill a baby, most certainly not beyond the point of viability.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I will repeat to the lying or stupid left wing communist cult fucks.

ROE V WADE WAS MUCH MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE CURRENT LAWS IN MANY STATES.

You lying or stupid bags of shit are lying or stupid for politics.

 

[Mashmont]

Good for her.

Abortion is a very painful personal decision and the government needs to keep the fuck out of it.

Painful? Leftwingers get abortions as easily as you or I go through the McDonald's drive-thru.

 

[ColonelAngus]

You stupid fucks need to get it through your head.

ROE V WADE WAS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE CURRENT LAWS IN MANY STATES.

HOW EXACTLY DID AMERICAN WOMEN LOSE THEIR RIGHTS?

 

[JoeB131]

Sorry, but most people in a civilized society don’t believe in giving a woman carte blanche authority to kill a baby, most certainly not beyond the point of viability.

Nobody is aborting a late stage abortion unless something has gone horribly wrong, and most people need to mind their own fucking business.

 

[JoeB131]

You stupid fucks need to get it through your head.

ROE V WADE WAS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE CURRENT LAWS IN MANY STATES.

HOW EXACTLY DID AMERICAN WOMEN LOSE THEIR RIGHTS?

I think you are a bit confused, so let me help you out.

Roe v. Wade DID allow for some restrictions on late-trimester abortions. But those restrictions were completely nullified by the companion decision, Doe v. Boland, which allowed for abortion at any time based on the woman's health. Doe was issued the same day as Roe, so they knew exactly what they were doing.

 

[Independent thinker]

“I’m not gonna engage in hypotheticals because we could go on a variety of scenarios,” she said. “Let’s just start with a fundamental fact, a basic freedom has been taken from the women of America: the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v Wade. And that is it.”
She in no way said she supports babies being killed on tables.

But, she couldn't even say she's against killing babies on tables, deflecting from the question. Is that really so hard to say? Why couldn't she roll her eyes and emphatically say she is against killing babies on tables and that that characterization is stupid? Instead she deflects.

 

[TNHarley]

But, she couldn't even say she's against killing babies on tables, deflecting from the question. Is that really so hard to say? Why couldn't she roll her eyes and emphatically say she is against killing babies on tables and that that characterization is stupid? Instead she deflects.

Did he ask her that silly question? I didnt see that. I did see when it came to restrictions, her answer was she wanted back RvW

 

[healthmyths]

“I’m not gonna engage in hypotheticals because we could go on a variety of scenarios,” she said. “Let’s just start with a fundamental fact, a basic freedom has been taken from the women of America: the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v Wade. And that is it.”
She in no way said she supports babies being killed on tables.

So why do people like you support dumb ass women who have their 2nd or more abortions?
FACTS are 45% of abortions are done by dumb ass women who don't use protection i.e. birth control or condoms!
I favor abortion for health of woman, rape and under age 30 for their first time.

For nearly a quarter (24%), it was their second abortion. For 11% of women who had an abortion that year, it was their third, and for 8% it was their fourth or more....But with 45% of all abortions being the 2nd or more most of these women and men are truly irresponsible !

Which Abortion Patients Have Had a Prior Abortion? Findings from the 2014 U.S. Abortion Patient Survey - PMC

Background: Updated information about abortion patients who have had a prior abortion could inform patient-centered practices that help women avoid unintended pregnancies in the future. Materials and Methods: Data come from a national sample of ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

There should be some type of community service regarding life saving aspects... like if a woman and known male were having 2nd or more abortion they should be found guilty of some type of death related community service of say 100 hours. Thus helping them become more aware of birth pills, condoms, i.e. protection and ultimately the responsibility of having unprotected sex!
1m
Reply

 

[healthmyths]

Sorry, but most people in a civilized society don’t believe in giving a woman carte blanche authority to kill a baby, most certainly not beyond the point of viability.

Irresponsible women over age 30 have 45% of abortions their 2nd or 3rd time.

Which Abortion Patients Have Had a Prior Abortion? Findings from the 2014 U.S. Abortion Patient Survey - PMC

Background: Updated information about abortion patients who have had a prior abortion could inform patient-centered practices that help women avoid unintended pregnancies in the future. Materials and Methods: Data come from a national sample of ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[DBA]

Nobody is aborting a late stage abortion unless something has gone horribly wrong, and most people need to mind their own fucking business.

If nobody's doing it, then it shouldn't be a problem making laws against it.

 

[TNHarley]

So why do people like you support dumb ass women who have their 2nd or more abortions?
FACTS are 45% of abortions are done by dumb ass women who don't use protection i.e. birth control or condoms!
I favor abortion for health of woman, rape and under age 30 for their first time.

For nearly a quarter (24%), it was their second abortion. For 11% of women who had an abortion that year, it was their third, and for 8% it was their fourth or more....But with 45% of all abortions being the 2nd or more most of these women and men are truly irresponsible !

Which Abortion Patients Have Had a Prior Abortion? Findings from the 2014 U.S. Abortion Patient Survey - PMC

Background: Updated information about abortion patients who have had a prior abortion could inform patient-centered practices that help women avoid unintended pregnancies in the future. Materials and Methods: Data come from a national sample of ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

There should be some type of community service regarding life saving aspects... like if a woman and known male were having 2nd or more abortion they should be found guilty of some type of death related community service of say 100 hours. Thus helping them become more aware of birth pills, condoms, i.e. protection and ultimately the responsibility of having unprotected sex!
1m
Reply

I support bodily autonomy. I support the govt staying out of the affairs of peoples private lives. I dont give two shits about that other mess.
I am against abortion, but I support peoples right to do it. Im not the moral police.

 

[DBA]

I support bodily autonomy. I support the govt staying out of the affairs of peoples private lives. I dont give two shits about that other mess.
I am against abortion, but I support peoples right to do it. Im not the moral police.

Do you support people's right to murder? If not, then you are, in fact, supporting morality.

 

[Arlette]

She is such a motherfucking liar.

What freedoms have been removed from the women of California, for example?

It is a state issue. “THE WOMEN OF AMERICA” haven’t lost shit.

Plus, WHAT IS A WOMAN?

Not everybody lives in California.

 

[Arlette]

Plus, WHAT IS A WOMAN?

A woman is a person that makes you feel inadequate.

 

[Independent thinker]

Did he ask her that silly question? I didnt see that. I did see when it came to restrictions, her answer was she wanted back RvW

Well, the fact is, RvW isn't in the Constitution. So, that means it gets decided by the Supreme Court. And, it is disingenuine for either side to say that the Supreme Court was right one time and not the other. So, we had like 40 years of it one way so now, to be fair, we can have it 40 years of the other way. If it was a right in the first place then it would be in the Constitution. So, it was never really a right.

 

[TNHarley]

Do you support people's right to murder? If not, then you are, in fact, supporting morality.

No i dont support murder. Silly question.