Kamala (in CA) blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row

forkintheroad7

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2024
Messages
3,794
Reaction score
2,229
Points
928

I thought I had watched that debate but I must have stepped out to get some... probably a stiff drink or something because I don't remember this. But here it is on tape FOREVER

Thanks Hannity

Thanks Tulsi Gabbard!

Go to point .30 (especially)

This is at the top of the list of things we should know about this... uh... this phony

:oops:

Yeh, she didn't do anything to stop this injustice until someone or some court forced her to..

:mad:
 

I thought I had watched that debate but I must have stepped out to get some... probably a stiff drink or something because I don't remember this. But here it is on tape FOREVER

Thanks Hannity

Thanks Tulsi Gabbard!

Go to point .30 (especially)

This is at the top of the list of things we should know about this... uh... this phony

:oops:

Yeh, she didn't do anything to stop this injustice until someone or some court forced her to..

:mad:

Hey, it was for democracy.
 
Tulsi can't help Trump. She couldn't help herself. She spewed inaccurate statements but the desperate right now looks for any hope.
 

Were Tulsi Gabbard’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor on target?​


Harris "blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so."

Gabbard’s campaign said she was referring to the case of Kevin Cooper, a black man on death row in California. We found Gabbard’s statement leaves out some key information.

The New York Times fact-checked Gabbard’s claim about Cooper by explaining that he was "convicted by a jury for a 1983 quadruple murder. Ms. Harris, as attorney general, did not allow new advanced DNA testing in his case, denying Mr. Cooper’s request. After The New York Times wrote about the case, Ms. Harris told Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that "I feel awful about this" and called on the state to allow for such testing."

The Times added that, "While Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has ordered additional DNA testing in the case and a number of legal and judicial experts say that Mr. Cooper was wrongfully convicted, the advanced testing has not yet proved Mr. Cooper’s innocence and allowed him to leave death row."

The senator’s campaign spokesperson told The Washington Post after the debate that Harris was not directly involved in the decision to deny Cooper’s petition in 2016.

"Senator Harris ran an office of 5,000 people and takes responsibility for all the actions of the [California] Department of Justice during her tenure," the statement said, according to the Post. "Most of the legal activity around this case occurred before her terms in office, but this specific request was made to and decided by lower level attorneys."

 
Can you imagine doing this to someone? Keeping out exculpatory evidence that could free an innocent man from death row?

Also, she incarcerated 1500 men, probably mostly Black (she is not Black) for marijuana use when she was smoking it herself?

She kept people in prison to provide cheap labor for the state?!

HEIL!

Yeh, we can see why she laughs all the time, can't we?

That's hilarious stuff.. :oops:
 
Well, Gabbard is stone faced liar. As I live in the Bay Area, and consumed news from Bay Area outlets, I can say without that Gabbard is a lying shit faced fool.

Oh, those who do not know, Kamala Harris is opposed the death penalty.
 
Tulsi can't help Trump. She couldn't help herself. She spewed inaccurate statements but the desperate right now looks for any hope.


What is ironic is that she polled better than Harris in 2019.

Yet, somehow Harris was chosen for V.P with 2%.

Weird...
 
Well, Gabbard is stone faced liar. As I live in the Bay Area, and consumed news from Bay Area outlets, I can say without that Gabbard is a lying shit faced fool.

Oh, those who do not know, Kamala Harris is opposed the death penalty.
Please... :rolleyes:
 
Right.. Gabbard is going to go on national TV and LIE about something that is a matter of public record. And then, on top of that Fox News is going to support her "lies"

Get outa here already..

Liars calling people a liar.. ha ha.. :auiqs.jpg:
 

Were Tulsi Gabbard’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor on target?​


Harris "blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so."

Gabbard’s campaign said she was referring to the case of Kevin Cooper, a black man on death row in California. We found Gabbard’s statement leaves out some key information.

The New York Times fact-checked Gabbard’s claim about Cooper by explaining that he was "convicted by a jury for a 1983 quadruple murder. Ms. Harris, as attorney general, did not allow new advanced DNA testing in his case, denying Mr. Cooper’s request. After The New York Times wrote about the case, Ms. Harris told Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that "I feel awful about this" and called on the state to allow for such testing."
Oh, we're supposed to trust the WA post..

AND

the New York Times!

Um.. no, I tend to trust Tulsi Gabbard. She, unlike those who run those rags.. WOKE up

and left the sicko party of baby killers and border destroyers
 

Were Tulsi Gabbard’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor on target?​


Harris "blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so."

Gabbard’s campaign said she was referring to the case of Kevin Cooper, a black man on death row in California. We found Gabbard’s statement leaves out some key information.

The New York Times fact-checked Gabbard’s claim about Cooper by explaining that he was "convicted by a jury for a 1983 quadruple murder. Ms. Harris, as attorney general, did not allow new advanced DNA testing in his case, denying Mr. Cooper’s request. After The New York Times wrote about the case, Ms. Harris told Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that "I feel awful about this" and called on the state to allow for such testing."

The Times added that, "While Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has ordered additional DNA testing in the case and a number of legal and judicial experts say that Mr. Cooper was wrongfully convicted, the advanced testing has not yet proved Mr. Cooper’s innocence and allowed him to leave death row."

The senator’s campaign spokesperson told The Washington Post after the debate that Harris was not directly involved in the decision to deny Cooper’s petition in 2016.

"Senator Harris ran an office of 5,000 people and takes responsibility for all the actions of the [California] Department of Justice during her tenure," the statement said, according to the Post. "Most of the legal activity around this case occurred before her terms in office, but this specific request was made to and decided by lower level attorneys."

So if she fried a black guy, is she still black IM2?

~S~
 

Were Tulsi Gabbard’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor on target?​


Harris "blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so."

Gabbard’s campaign said she was referring to the case of Kevin Cooper, a black man on death row in California. We found Gabbard’s statement leaves out some key information.

The New York Times fact-checked Gabbard’s claim about Cooper by explaining that he was "convicted by a jury for a 1983 quadruple murder. Ms. Harris, as attorney general, did not allow new advanced DNA testing in his case, denying Mr. Cooper’s request. After The New York Times wrote about the case, Ms. Harris told Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that "I feel awful about this" and called on the state to allow for such testing."

The Times added that, "While Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has ordered additional DNA testing in the case and a number of legal and judicial experts say that Mr. Cooper was wrongfully convicted, the advanced testing has not yet proved Mr. Cooper’s innocence and allowed him to leave death row."

The senator’s campaign spokesperson told The Washington Post after the debate that Harris was not directly involved in the decision to deny Cooper’s petition in 2016.

"Senator Harris ran an office of 5,000 people and takes responsibility for all the actions of the [California] Department of Justice during her tenure," the statement said, according to the Post. "Most of the legal activity around this case occurred before her terms in office, but this specific request was made to and decided by lower level attorneys."


The Attorney General doesn't know about the poisonous tree under her own wing, of which even rises to the Governor? You're missing some rational thought IM2, what a surprise.

A. The inmate requested advanced testing, and was denied by Kamala's office. It's also true under her wing evidence was tampered with, processes compromised, and Kamala's office kept it on a downlow, like nothing happened. Cuz you know, "white men are RACIST!", cough. After all dude, your brothers get in too much trouble under the Democratic model.

B. Kamala then says, ah.........I feel bad now. So under pressure she allowed it, but the new evidence failed to demonstrate the guy was innocent. Before, after, before, after...........Critical thought dude, try it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom