Kamala Harris and the Ukrainian crisis

[Dissident]

​

Last month, the Republican presidential nominee, the Former President Donald Trump said the following about Ms Harris’s role in the Ukrainian crisis:​

Spoiler

Nobody likes to talk about it. But just so you understand, they sent her (Ms Harris) to negotiate peace before this war started. Three days later he went in and he started the war because everything they said was weak and stupid. They said the wrong things. That war should have never started. She was the emissary. They sent her in to negotiate with Zelenskyy and Putin. And she did and the war started three days later.
And that's the kind of talent we have with her… She is a horrible negotiator. They sent her in to negotiate. As soon as they left Putin did the invasion.​

And below I would like to analyze the statements of Ms. Harris herself on issues related to Ukraine and I would like to give my comments to her statements.

During the presidential debate with Donald Trump, Ms. Harris said:​

And because of our support, … Ukraine stands as an independent and free country… we have done (a lot) to preserve the ability of Zelenskyy and the Ukrainians to fight for their Independence.​

After the “democratic revolution” in February 2014, Ukraine – in my opinion – is in no way an independent country.

For example, Joe Biden openly bragged in an interview with Voice of America that he had forced the post-Maidan Ukrainian government to fire Ukraine's Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokhin; see in this regard the thread Is present Ukraine an independent country?

Can a country be called an independent one if a foreign politician removes the country's Prosecutor-General? And there were no such facts in Ukraine before their “revolution”.

As for freedom in Ukraine after the “democratic revolution” of February 2014, it can be said that in many respects the situation has become much worse than it was before the “revolution”; see in this regard the thread What kind of country is modern Ukraine?​

• In Ukraine, the rights of national minorities have been significantly curtailed – before the “revolution” these minorities had much more rights.​
• In this country, freedom of opposition media is now being suppressed - something that has never happened before.​

And so on.

In June, on the Summit on Peace in Ukraine in Switzerland, Ms. Harris declared:​

…sovereignty and territorial integrity of ALL states must be respected… it is one of our defining missions to uphold the international rules-based order to defend it, strengthen it, and promote it. And no doubt, it must be a priority for us all.​

see the official website of the White House.

Actually, Ms. Harris's statement should have been formulated as:​

In the case of Ukraine, sovereignty and territorial integrity must be respected...… it is one of our defining missions to uphold the international rules-based order to defend it, strengthen it, and promote it. And no doubt, in the case of Ukraine, it must be a priority for us all.​

I emphasized the words "in the case of Ukraine" in both phrases because the US government acted in exactly the opposite way in the case of the former Yugoslavia.
In 1999, the United States and its allies bombed Yugoslavia in order to force its government to withdraw Yugoslav police and army from Kosovo, where separatists fought by force of arms for separation of Kosovo from Yugoslavia; see the thread The US attitude to Yugoslavia and to Ukraine.

Therefore, we can conclude that Ms. Harris plays a rather negative role in the Ukrainian crisis.

The picture above is taken from the thread Nazi insignia on Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk region.

Source​

 

[JWBooth]

Crisis? There is no Ukrainian crisis.
Except maybe to a bunch of Nazi loving cretins and those in the line of fire.

 

[IM2]

​

Last month, the Republican presidential nominee, the Former President Donald Trump said the following about Ms Harris’s role in the Ukrainian crisis:​

Spoiler

And below I would like to analyze the statements of Ms. Harris herself on issues related to Ukraine and I would like to give my comments to her statements.

During the presidential debate with Donald Trump, Ms. Harris said:


After the “democratic revolution” in February 2014, Ukraine – in my opinion – is in no way an independent country.

For example, Joe Biden openly bragged in an interview with Voice of America that he had forced the post-Maidan Ukrainian government to fire Ukraine's Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokhin; see in this regard the thread Is present Ukraine an independent country?

Can a country be called an independent one if a foreign politician removes the country's Prosecutor-General? And there were no such facts in Ukraine before their “revolution”.

As for freedom in Ukraine after the “democratic revolution” of February 2014, it can be said that in many respects the situation has become much worse than it was before the “revolution”; see in this regard the thread What kind of country is modern Ukraine?​

• In Ukraine, the rights of national minorities have been significantly curtailed – before the “revolution” these minorities had much more rights.​
• In this country, freedom of opposition media is now being suppressed - something that has never happened before.​

And so on.

In June, on the Summit on Peace in Ukraine in Switzerland, Ms. Harris declared:

see the official website of the White House.

Actually, Ms. Harris's statement should have been formulated as:


I emphasized the words "in the case of Ukraine" in both phrases because the US government acted in exactly the opposite way in the case of the former Yugoslavia.
In 1999, the United States and its allies bombed Yugoslavia in order to force its government to withdraw Yugoslav police and army from Kosovo, where separatists fought by force of arms for separation of Kosovo from Yugoslavia; see the thread The US attitude to Yugoslavia and to Ukraine.

Therefore, we can conclude that Ms. Harris plays a rather negative role in the Ukrainian crisis.

The picture above is taken from the thread Nazi insignia on Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk region.

Source​

Every Ukranian is not a member of the Azov Battalion and that doesn't give Putin the right to invade.

 

[0311]

​

Last month, the Republican presidential nominee, the Former President Donald Trump said the following about Ms Harris’s role in the Ukrainian crisis:​

Spoiler

And below I would like to analyze the statements of Ms. Harris herself on issues related to Ukraine and I would like to give my comments to her statements.

During the presidential debate with Donald Trump, Ms. Harris said:


After the “democratic revolution” in February 2014, Ukraine – in my opinion – is in no way an independent country.

For example, Joe Biden openly bragged in an interview with Voice of America that he had forced the post-Maidan Ukrainian government to fire Ukraine's Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokhin; see in this regard the thread Is present Ukraine an independent country?

Can a country be called an independent one if a foreign politician removes the country's Prosecutor-General? And there were no such facts in Ukraine before their “revolution”.

As for freedom in Ukraine after the “democratic revolution” of February 2014, it can be said that in many respects the situation has become much worse than it was before the “revolution”; see in this regard the thread What kind of country is modern Ukraine?​

• In Ukraine, the rights of national minorities have been significantly curtailed – before the “revolution” these minorities had much more rights.​
• In this country, freedom of opposition media is now being suppressed - something that has never happened before.​

And so on.

In June, on the Summit on Peace in Ukraine in Switzerland, Ms. Harris declared:

see the official website of the White House.

Actually, Ms. Harris's statement should have been formulated as:


I emphasized the words "in the case of Ukraine" in both phrases because the US government acted in exactly the opposite way in the case of the former Yugoslavia.
In 1999, the United States and its allies bombed Yugoslavia in order to force its government to withdraw Yugoslav police and army from Kosovo, where separatists fought by force of arms for separation of Kosovo from Yugoslavia; see the thread The US attitude to Yugoslavia and to Ukraine.

Therefore, we can conclude that Ms. Harris plays a rather negative role in the Ukrainian crisis.

The picture above is taken from the thread Nazi insignia on Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk region.

Source​

​

Last month, the Republican presidential nominee, the Former President Donald Trump said the following about Ms Harris’s role in the Ukrainian crisis:​

Spoiler

And below I would like to analyze the statements of Ms. Harris herself on issues related to Ukraine and I would like to give my comments to her statements.

During the presidential debate with Donald Trump, Ms. Harris said:


After the “democratic revolution” in February 2014, Ukraine – in my opinion – is in no way an independent country.

For example, Joe Biden openly bragged in an interview with Voice of America that he had forced the post-Maidan Ukrainian government to fire Ukraine's Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokhin; see in this regard the thread Is present Ukraine an independent country?

Can a country be called an independent one if a foreign politician removes the country's Prosecutor-General? And there were no such facts in Ukraine before their “revolution”.

As for freedom in Ukraine after the “democratic revolution” of February 2014, it can be said that in many respects the situation has become much worse than it was before the “revolution”; see in this regard the thread What kind of country is modern Ukraine?​

• In Ukraine, the rights of national minorities have been significantly curtailed – before the “revolution” these minorities had much more rights.​
• In this country, freedom of opposition media is now being suppressed - something that has never happened before.​

And so on.

In June, on the Summit on Peace in Ukraine in Switzerland, Ms. Harris declared:

see the official website of the White House.

Actually, Ms. Harris's statement should have been formulated as:


I emphasized the words "in the case of Ukraine" in both phrases because the US government acted in exactly the opposite way in the case of the former Yugoslavia.
In 1999, the United States and its allies bombed Yugoslavia in order to force its government to withdraw Yugoslav police and army from Kosovo, where separatists fought by force of arms for separation of Kosovo from Yugoslavia; see the thread The US attitude to Yugoslavia and to Ukraine.

Therefore, we can conclude that Ms. Harris plays a rather negative role in the Ukrainian crisis.

The picture above is taken from the thread Nazi insignia on Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk region.

Source​

No proof. Hearsay. No proof. Just MAGA MANURE BULLSHIT!!!

 

[luiza]

Every Ukranian is not a member of the Azov Battalion and that doesn't give Putin the right to invade.

Usual misinformation from our elderly white popagandist .

 

[zaangalewa]

Donald Trump: President of the USA a high traitor and slave of Putin. I never underestimated the cruelity of organisations like the KGB. But I underestimated them in total. Looks like I thought brutal idiots are not able to be intelligent. A very heavy mistake. And looks like I also overestimated the USA.

 

[Zebra]

putin has no right to invade ukraine

 

[Deadstick]

putin has no right to invade ukraine

Did we have the right to invade France on D-Day?

 

[Deadstick]

Donald Trump: President of the USA a high traitor and slave of Putin. I never underestimated the cruelity of organisations like the KGB. But I underestimated them in total. Looks like I thought brutal idiots are not able to be intelligent. A very heavy mistake. And looks like I also overestimated the USA.

There has been no KGB for decades you clown, but the CIA are still here and did you forget the cruelty of the Gestapo?

 

[Ringo]

 

[zaangalewa]

There has been no KGB for decades you clown,

How do you call the KGB now, Russian?

but the CIA are still here

Where "here"?

and did you forget the cruelty of the Gestapo?

No. I also did not forget the cruelity of the Stasi. Or torture prisons of the USA - specially also not torture prisons of the USA in Poland.

 

[zaangalewa]

Did we have the right to invade France on D-Day?

Yes. The USA and others had the right to liberate France - but you had no right to rape French women by doing so, US-Russian.