Justifying A Government Religion

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Believe manmade global warming is real if you must, but there is no way you can justify tax dollars paying to promote your belief:

Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Sen. Jim Inhofe told Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy Friday to hand over information about the extent left-leaning nonprofit advocacy groups' influenced greenhouse gas regulations on power plants.

"While it is well known that these rules will have a devastating economic impact on state and local governments, businesses, and private citizens, very little is known about the amount of taxpayer dollars and agency resources that have already gone into developing these rules," the Oklahoma Republican told McCarthy in a letter.

"The extent of EPA's ongoing, close coordination with these groups and individuals and lack of transparency about expenditures in support of these rule makings are unacceptable," he said.

Inhofe wants documents on EPA coordination with nonprofit environmental groups
By Ethan Barton | April 17, 2015 | 5:17 pm

Inhofe wants documents on EPA coordination with nonprofit environmental groups WashingtonExaminer.com

Bottom line: Either you want to live in a parasite society, or you want to live in a society dedicated to individual freedoms:

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.​
 
Dumb de dumb dumb dumb. But what else would we expect of a knownothing idiot.

So the asshole equates science with belief. So do a lot of very fundementlist religionists. However, the rest of the world that is sane knows better. We cannot get this guy out of office quick enough. What a whore.
 
Dumb de dumb dumb dumb. But what else would we expect of a knownothing idiot.

So the asshole equates science with belief. So do a lot of very fundementlist religionists. However, the rest of the world that is sane knows better. We cannot get this guy out of office quick enough. What a whore.

European courts have found belief in age to be a religion. AGW is on par with scientology.
 
Twist and turn while trying to burn...
Step on a crack...break your mother's back.
Jack and jill went up a hill...
Little Jack Horner sat in a corner....
Mary Mary quite contrary....

What's your point?
 
Twist and turn while trying to burn...
Step on a crack...break your mother's back.
Jack and jill went up a hill...
Little Jack Horner sat in a corner....
Mary Mary quite contrary....

What's your point?
Twist the truth to burn the opponent...
You start with the fallacy of trying to compare bureaucratic office into a religion...
Bottom line: Either you want to live in a parasite society, or you want to live in a society dedicated to individual freedoms:

Well the slaves wondered that to when the nation was founded....But the administration of gas emissions has nothing to do with a parasitic nature or operation....
 
Believe manmade global warming is real if you must, but there is no way you can justify tax dollars paying to promote your belief:

Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Sen. Jim Inhofe told Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy Friday to hand over information about the extent left-leaning nonprofit advocacy groups' influenced greenhouse gas regulations on power plants.

"While it is well known that these rules will have a devastating economic impact on state and local governments, businesses, and private citizens, very little is known about the amount of taxpayer dollars and agency resources that have already gone into developing these rules," the Oklahoma Republican told McCarthy in a letter.

"The extent of EPA's ongoing, close coordination with these groups and individuals and lack of transparency about expenditures in support of these rule makings are unacceptable," he said.

Inhofe wants documents on EPA coordination with nonprofit environmental groups
By Ethan Barton | April 17, 2015 | 5:17 pm

Inhofe wants documents on EPA coordination with nonprofit environmental groups WashingtonExaminer.com

Bottom line: Either you want to live in a parasite society, or you want to live in a society dedicated to individual freedoms:

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.​

So you AND Inhofe are stupid bigots? Well, if you insist.
 
So the asshole equates science with belief. So do a lot of very fundementlist religionists. However, the rest of the world that is sane knows better. We cannot get this guy out of office quick enough. What a whore.

To Old Rocks: I try not to waste my time on halfwits, but I’ll give it another shot in your case.

The original Bill of Rights does not give Rights.


First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The best elected officials like Sen. Jim Inhofe, and SOME civil servants, protect Rights —— including the Rights of Americans who do not practice a religion. Environmental freakazoids created the concept of taking Rights away with tax dollars for the benefit and protection of the parasite class.

w200-c87ae81e039b30d671f8fc84aad4eed7.jpg

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy is under fire from Sen. Jim Inhofe,...
 
Oil and Coal Money in Politics
James M. Inhofe has accepted $311,800 in oil contributions during the 110th congress. $160,800 of those dollars were from industry PACS. In total, Inhofe received $662,506 from oil companies between 2000 and 2008, which makes him a top recipient of oil money. In addition to oil, Inhofe has received $152,800 in coal contributions during the 110th Congress. $94,500 of those dollars were from industry PACS. See above for oil and energy voting record.[3]
 
Believe manmade global warming is real if you must, but there is no way you can justify tax dollars paying to promote your belief:

Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Sen. Jim Inhofe told Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy Friday to hand over information about the extent left-leaning nonprofit advocacy groups' influenced greenhouse gas regulations on power plants.

"While it is well known that these rules will have a devastating economic impact on state and local governments, businesses, and private citizens, very little is known about the amount of taxpayer dollars and agency resources that have already gone into developing these rules," the Oklahoma Republican told McCarthy in a letter.

"The extent of EPA's ongoing, close coordination with these groups and individuals and lack of transparency about expenditures in support of these rule makings are unacceptable," he said.

Inhofe wants documents on EPA coordination with nonprofit environmental groups
By Ethan Barton | April 17, 2015 | 5:17 pm

Inhofe wants documents on EPA coordination with nonprofit environmental groups WashingtonExaminer.com

Bottom line: Either you want to live in a parasite society, or you want to live in a society dedicated to individual freedoms:

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.​

About dam time we separate the enviro-wacko religion from science and government.. The left wing agenda is now to be exposed for the fraud it is
 
Oil and Coal Money in Politics
James M. Inhofe has accepted $311,800 in oil contributions during the 110th congress. $160,800 of those dollars were from industry PACS. In total, Inhofe received $662,506 from oil companies between 2000 and 2008, which makes him a top recipient of oil money. In addition to oil, Inhofe has received $152,800 in coal contributions during the 110th Congress. $94,500 of those dollars were from industry PACS. See above for oil and energy voting record.[3]

What a bunch of bull shit... Lets talk the 857 BILLION dollars given to left wing hacks to make up science like evidence to promote their lie that a central control government is needed and personal rights and property ownership is not.. AGW is a lie and a Socialist/communist central control government is their goal. IT alwasy has been.
 
Where did you get the figure $857 billion, what qualifies someone to be "a left wing hack", precisely what is wrong with being a leftist, how many of them received this vast sum and over what length of time?

Those details were provided regarding oil industry donations to Senator Inhofe. You owe us the same points in your counter accusation. At the very least, you owe us a source. We can all make up numbers.

PS: BFGRN's info came from James Inhofe - OpenCongress Wiki
 
Oil and Coal Money in Politics
James M. Inhofe has accepted $311,800 in oil contributions during the 110th congress. $160,800 of those dollars were from industry PACS. In total, Inhofe received $662,506 from oil companies between 2000 and 2008, which makes him a top recipient of oil money. In addition to oil, Inhofe has received $152,800 in coal contributions during the 110th Congress. $94,500 of those dollars were from industry PACS. See above for oil and energy voting record.[3]

What a bunch of bull shit... Lets talk the 857 BILLION dollars given to left wing hacks to make up science like evidence to promote their lie that a central control government is needed and personal rights and property ownership is not.. AGW is a lie and a Socialist/communist central control government is their goal. IT alwasy has been.

Links?

How ironic...the environmental policy of the right in America is IDENTICAL to the old communist central control of the Soviet Union.
 
Your political knowledge needs some serious remediation.

To Crick: All of the remediation in the world is not going to help Taqiyya the Liar. The scary part is that he might be sick enough to believe his own lies:

President Obama said Saturday that with the U.S. at the helm, the world must come together later this year and strike a groundbreaking climate-change accord or the planet as we know it may cease to exist.

XXXXX

“There’s new hope that, with American leadership, this year the world will finally reach an agreement to prevent the worst impacts of climate change before it’s too late,” he said. “This is an issue that’s bigger and longer-lasting than my presidency. It’s about protecting our God-given natural wonders and the good jobs that rely on them.

Obama: U.S. must secure global climate-change deal ‘before it’s too late’
By Ben Wolfgang - The Washington Times - Saturday, April 18, 2015

Obama U.S. must secure global climate-change deal before it s too late - Washington Times

Oil and Coal Money in Politics
James M. Inhofe has accepted $311,800 in oil contributions during the 110th congress. $160,800 of those dollars were from industry PACS. In total, Inhofe received $662,506 from oil companies between 2000 and 2008, which makes him a top recipient of oil money. In addition to oil, Inhofe has received $152,800 in coal contributions during the 110th Congress. $94,500 of those dollars were from industry PACS. See above for oil and energy voting record.

To Bfgrn: Get serious. Taking money from petroleum corporations is legal. Taking money from foreign governments and individuals is illegal. And let’s not overlook this:


417cartoon.jpg

Though environmental impact statement after environmental impact statement from his own Department of State concludes that the Keystone XL Pipeline would not have a significant environmental impact, President Obama said the impact “could be disastrous.”

The alleged disaster would come from the carbon dioxide generated from the production and use of the 800,000 barrels of petroleum the pipeline would transport daily from Canada to our Gulf-Coast refineries.

XXXXX

If the impact of those 800,000 barrels (most of which would get to market even without the pipeline) are so problematic, how much more so would be the 800,000 barrels/day that are projected to get to the market from Iran if the international sanctions are lifted?

XXXXX

Doesn’t the president think the additional Iranian oil production “could be disastrous?”​

Cartoon: The Oil Producer Obama Favors
Glenn Foden / April 17, 2015

Cartoon The Oil Producer Obama Favors

About dam time we separate the enviro-wacko religion from science and government.. The left wing agenda is now to be exposed for the fraud it is

To Billy_Bob: One slight disagreement. Environmental-wacko designer-science is a tenet of the Socialist religion. Separate environmental fraud from the government and you still have Socialism.


What a bunch of bull shit... Lets talk the 857 BILLION dollars given to left wing hacks to make up science like evidence to promote their lie that a central control government is needed and personal rights and property ownership is not.. AGW is a lie and a Socialist/communist central control government is their goal. IT alwasy has been.

To Billy_Bob: Exactly so.

The truth is that Lefties never, ever, connect designer-science tax dollars to the United Nations where most of the money goes.

How ironic...the environmental policy of the right in America is IDENTICAL to the old communist central control of the Soviet Union.

To Bfgrn: Your idiocy made me realize that tax dollars operate the merry-go-round for the suckers:

 
Hate to break it to the members of the AGW religion in here but..............Inhofe is winning. He has spiked the ball in the faces of the AGW k00ks for years......that's why they hate him with a passion.

Inhofe is so effective at highlightinig that the EPA doesn't save the environment......it destroys lives. Anybody who doesn't get it navigates life with their thumbs firmly planted up their asses.

EPA Regs To Destroy 887 000 Jobs Per Year Senator Says Citing New Study CNS News


Just this week, Obama proposed to close a couple of dozen more coal plants via executive fiat. What you are saying to a couple of thousand people is, "FUCK YOU.......NO MORE JOB FOR YOU!! GO FLIP HAMBURGERS!!"

To the modern progressive, the tradeoff is perfect.........put people out of work via taxes to foster bigger government and more power and the herding of the sheep continues = utopia for these bozo's. Its called trickle-up poverty economics.:2up::eusa_dance::eusa_dance: Elitist goofball progressives love it!!:gay:
 

Forum List

Back
Top