Justice Kentanji Jackson says laws banning sex changes for young children are "sort of the same thing" as banning interracial marriage.

To quote the Terminator: WRONG. Alcohol laws are governed by the states.

You suddenly desire to make all Catholic parents felons???

Child Services is throwing parents in jail for letting 10 year olds walk home from school alone, you don't think they would do the same for parents letting their kids smoke and drink?
 
Cite the Fed law.

State laws mostly.

And they create situations where if someone feels harassed at work the company becomes liable.

Thus I call someone the wrong pronoun the company feels compelled to fire my ass.

Not because they want to, but because they may get sued under a harassment law.
 
Child Services is throwing parents in jail for letting 10 year olds walk home from school alone, you don't think they would do the same for parents letting their kids smoke and drink?
I literally cited the Texas law concerning alcohol. Plenty of families will allow older children to have a glass of wine. On special occasions we were allowed wine. Mom and the families she grew up with, it was normal to do that (French or Italian). Again, not every family's background is the same. And of course that whole Communion thing.

I am not discussing tobacco. I don't know anything about it.

State laws mostly.
Not Fed

And they create situations where if someone feels harassed at work the company becomes liable.
Thats not what a right is. You can't go to jail because of a right. You can be fired.

Thus I call someone the wrong pronoun the company feels compelled to fire my ass.
Capitalism sucks. Witness the oppression inherent in the system!

Not because they want to, but because they may get sued under a harassment law.
Sounds like its because they want to.
 
To quote the Terminator: WRONG. Alcohol laws are governed by the states. I am not aware of any state (maybe UTAH) where minors cannot drink with consent of their parents.

You suddenly desire to make all Catholic parents felons???
You are reaching.

Sure, dope is legal in many many states, but it is still a federal crime.

. . . and using the religion argument? :auiqs.jpg:


Even during prohibition the Feds didn't bother Catholics over that.


However, I will admit, this is an interesting discussion. I never would have thought you would be an advocate of states rights.

Who knew you are now in favor of the populations of various states being able to vote to restrict abortion. I have to admit, I am surprised.
 
I literally cited the Texas law concerning alcohol. Plenty of families will allow older children to have a glass of wine. On special occasions we were allowed wine. Mom and the families she grew up with, it was normal to do that (French or Italian). Again, not every family's background is the same. And of course that whole Communion thing.

I am not discussing tobacco. I don't know anything about it.

it was brought up in the post you responded to.

It's part of the discussion. See what happens to parents that let their kids smoke.
 
This is an end result of the left's attempt to equate race with sexuality/gender/sex/fetishes.
it goes to demofks belief system that children aren't human beings and why they can abort them without prejudice.
 
Sure, dope is legal in many many states, but it is still a federal crime.
Yes, for the moment. The last time we went to Vegas we went to the old part and they had weed shops, with police acting as security. That was...weird to see.

. . . and using the religion argument? :auiqs.jpg:
Even during prohibition the Feds didn't bother Catholics over that.
Note the law you cited ONLY was a funding law. It recognized the state had the right to control, and was tying monies to it, not enforcement. Further, if you read it, it did not contravene the statute I cited. Minors can't purchase alcohol with states that get that money. It didn't say minors couldn't drink with their parent's consent.

However, I will admit, this is an interesting discussion. I never would have thought you would be an advocate of states rights.
I am advocate for the absolute right of adults to be LEFT ALONE. As an example, I am sympathetic to Marty being left alone if he doesn't like redheads. But I am sympathetic that the state has no right to mandate hair color.

As another example, all the cake cases (evidently against one baker). Personally I feel the baker had a right to be LEFT ALONE. The purchasers had a right to protest outside and not purchase his cakes. There are many available substitutes and its not a medical/food/shelter situation.

Who knew you are now in favor of the populations of various states being able to vote to restrict abortion. I have to admit, I am surprised.
Roe was actually bad law but it was perfect for creating a compromise that everyone but extremists were ok with. But I always pointed out that the right was tied to medical viability. EVen without Dobbs, with medical advancement it would have eventually been moot.

I am however, in favor of a Constitutional right to privacy and personal autonomy. It should be enshrined as a new amendment. AS I have stated, any right that can be voted on, is not a right, its an issue.
 
Last edited:
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.


With your asinine assistance, we could have had a president Harris to elevate more of these leftist imbeciles to the high court.

Thank g-d America is smarter than you are.

Dumbfuck.
 
IMG_0055.webp
 
Yet another poster child for what is wrong with hiring people in which their female blackness is prioritized above intelligence and competence. (As if we needed another poster child after what we just witnessed from Kamala Harris.)
 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.


She's among the least qualified to have ever been appointed to the Court. She was below average by every measure. But...what she did was promise to carry the Marxist water.
 
She's among the least qualified to have ever been appointed to the Court. She was below average by every measure. But...what she did was promise to carry the Marxist water.
Least qualified person appointed to the Court: Jackson
Least qualified person ever to be a nominee for president: Harris
Least qualified person to ever be Press Secretary: Pierre

Stop picking incompetent people just because they are black and female!
 
15th post
“Justice” Jackson doesn’t understand the old Helen Reddy song, “I am woman.”

Her confusion starts at the word “woman.”

But she is our SCOTUS. 🙄
 
“Justice” Jackson doesn’t understand the old Helen Reddy song, “I am woman.”

Her confusion starts at the word “woman.”

But she is our SCOTUS. 🙄


It's almost unbelievable, isn't it?
 
Actually you can with parental approval. :p

The real issue is that by putting this to the state, they are saying the state can ban this for adults as well. She was asking if it were a fundamental right, like marriage. I listened to the oral arguments while working this morning.
Banning it for adults is another kettle of fish and irrelevant to this case.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom