Justice Kentanji Jackson says laws banning sex changes for young children are "sort of the same thing" as banning interracial marriage.

[M14 Shooter]

She is a legal scholar and one of the brilliant minds in the history of civilization!
We stand with Justice Jackson!

She even knows what the meaning of "is" is.

 

[Zincwarrior]

We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason

Actually you can with parental approval.

The real issue is that by putting this to the state, they are saying the state can ban this for adults as well. She was asking if it were a fundamental right, like marriage. I listened to the oral arguments while working this morning.

 

[Curried Goats]

This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.

That's a hilarious, emotionally driven rant. How about instead of arguing with your feelings you try science and reason instead?

 

[marvin martian]

That's a hilarious, emotionally driven rant. How about instead is arguing with your feelings you try science and reason instead?

Your "science" says men get pregnant, klanboi.

 

[martybegan]

Actually you can with parental approval.

The real issue is that by putting this to the state, they are saying the state can ban this for adults as well.

The left argues we shouldn't punish murderers under 25 too hard because their brains haven't developed yet.

And yet 6 year olds can decide with their parent's "help" to drug themselves?

 

[Curried Goats]

Your "science" says men get pregnant, klanboi.

What science is that fantasy player? Let's talk about it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The left argues we shouldn't punish murderers under 25 too hard because their brains haven't developed yet.

And yet 6 year olds can decide with their parent's "help" to drug themselves?

Agreed. However, I am referring to her discussion as to whether this was akin to a fundamental right. Fundamental rights can be limited somewhat in childhood, but not in adulthood (marriage as an example).

 

[MarathonMike]

This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.

Wow another DEI failure at the top level of our government.

 

[Billiejeens]

Do you still bemoan Trump's SCOTUS nominations?

2 recent threads where Taz has betrayed his left wing lunatic peers.

 

[Meathead]

This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.

Sotomayor has competition for being the stupidest SCJ.

 

[Billiejeens]

Amazingly stupid woman. Doesn't know what a woman is, and doesn't know what a child is. She should be impeached for stupidity.

She was hired for her stupidity.

 

[martybegan]

Agreed. However, I am referring to her discussion as to whether this was akin to a fundamental right. Fundamental rights can be limited somewhat in childhood, but not in adulthood (marriage as an example).

In adulthood the issue moves from being able to have these procedures/drugs into everyone else having to go along with the charade.

 

[Curried Goats]

In adulthood the issue moves from being able to have these procedures/drugs into everyone else having to go along with the charade.

The charade is you folks cosplaying as medical professionals.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

 

[Zincwarrior]

In adulthood the issue moves from being able to have these procedures/drugs into everyone else having to go along with the charade.

Yes, putting up with someone's charade, is part of America. You have no right to not be offended.

 

[Mac1958]

This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart.

I figure that ideology is not a function of intelligence. So an intelligent person can fall into an ideology like anyone else. Then, once in that ideology, they come up with stuff like this. And 58 genders. And fall for Trumpism.

It's why I'm anti-ideology. It's a fuckin' affliction.

 

[Billiejeens]

The charade is you folks cosplaying as medical professionals.

where do you imagine that you are seeing that?

 

[Billiejeens]

Mac only fools Mac

 

[M14 Shooter]

Fundamental rights can be limited somewhat in childhood, but not in adulthood (marriage as an example).

Especially when those fundamental rights are specifically protected by the constitution from infringement.

 

[Billiejeens]

Yes, putting up with someone's charade, is part of America. You have no right to not be offended.

That's not what anyone is claiming.