Justice Ginsberg attacks the legitimacy of Trump's candidacy

[JakeStarkey]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

And you're a Republican ...

Yup, one who is not afraid of the truth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

compare Trumps outstanding service to the country creating wealth for many and jobs for even more with Ginsberg's contributions that actually helped the working class.

That's silly. Trump cost hundreds of thousands their jobs in bankruptcies and closings. He has done no public service for the country. He is temperamentally unqualified for the presidency. Any comment about "at least he is better than Hillary" is similar to "there both really bad losers, but Donald is better," is ludicrous.

Neither are qualified.

Vote Johnson/Weld.

I see fake is quoting the "outyourass" poll. The source of most of his statistics.

I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

And you're a Republican ...

Yup, one who is not afraid of the truth.

The truth that you love Marxists makes you a Republican?

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

 

[kaz]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

And you're a Republican ...

Yup, one who is not afraid of the truth.

The truth that you love Marxists makes you a Republican?

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

 

[JakeStarkey]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

And you're a Republican ...

Yup, one who is not afraid of the truth.

The truth that you love Marxists makes you a Republican?

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

 

[kaz]

And you're a Republican ...

Yup, one who is not afraid of the truth.

The truth that you love Marxists makes you a Republican?

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, one who is not afraid of the truth.

The truth that you love Marxists makes you a Republican?

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.

 

[HenryBHough]

There are a few differences between the Obamaesque-apologist "justice" and her head cheer leader:

1. One acts 13 - the other IS 13. Guess which....
2. One acknowledges birth gender - the other is uncertain....
3. One wears black robes - the other seems to dress, shall we say, more casually....
4. One is sworn to the truth - the other? Not so much. Which, it seems, concerns either little....

What other differences have we all observed.

 

[kaz]

The truth that you love Marxists makes you a Republican?

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.

Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake?

And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to

 

[JakeStarkey]

Kaz, that you equate marxism with republicanism reveals you are silly. All real Republicans know that Trump is not a legitimate candidate and will not be voting for him this fall.

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.

Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to

Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.

 

[kaz]

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.

Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to

Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.

You don't know what a fascist is, Jakey.

Ginsburg is the wackiest the left has to offer, she's the flag bearer for the left on the court. It's comic you think you're fooling anyone that you're a Republican. The more into Marxism someone is, the more you adore them

 

[Contumacious]

That you don't know what Ginsburg is, is silly

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.

Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to

Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.

Comrade Starkiev

We concur. Johnson is NOT a Libertarian.

Trump is indeed a fascist -

BUT

our most important and basic right

the right to bear arms is secured with him


.

 

[HenryBHough]

At this point it may take a fascist to bring any kind of peace back to the land formerly known as "America". Either way things will change and all change is temporary at best.

 

[Contumacious]

At this point it may take a fascist to bring any kind of peace back to the land formerly known as "America". Either way things will change and all change is temporary at best.

Yep

Is like using a former hacker to protect your company's IT department. Hopefully , he will use his acumen to help us out of the nightmare created by the welfare/warfare advocates.

He is not a politician, he has a lot to learn, but as a billionaire he is not subservient to special interest groups.

.


.

 

[OldLady]

No, she's obviously a Democrat, and is displaying such.

It's funny that you're just figuring that out.

Her appointed, everything she's written, her life story... and you're just now learning who she is.

Our schools suck in many parts of the country.

Listen to Obama's speech, we have so many angry, frightened Trumpies because our schools don't teach people how to think.

Just? I've had you people pegged since high school.

As to education, the system needs to wrested away from the Democrats, by whatever means.

Maybe y'all could shoot them or put them in prison, like the Chinese did during the revolution.

If they continue to turn against America, why not?

It has never occurred to you to question why educated people tend to be Democrats?

That has not been the case in my experience. Democrats tend to live their lives in Fantasia.

Maybe they've learned something you didn't?

Unlikely. Star Trek and Disney films do not an education make.

Why are people with many years of education more likely to be liberals?

As I said, that has not been the case in my experience.

I am liberal in the classic sense. Democrats tend not to be.

Well, Billy, it's you folks who keep insisting that our universities are full of Democrat/liberal professors brainwashing our precious youth--I wouldn't know; I graduated 20+ years ago and haven't been back on a college campus since. I was taking your word for it.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No, she's obviously a Democrat, and is displaying such.

It's funny that you're just figuring that out.

Her appointed, everything she's written, her life story... and you're just now learning who she is.

Our schools suck in many parts of the country.

Listen to Obama's speech, we have so many angry, frightened Trumpies because our schools don't teach people how to think.

Just? I've had you people pegged since high school.

As to education, the system needs to wrested away from the Democrats, by whatever means.

Maybe y'all could shoot them or put them in prison, like the Chinese did during the revolution.

If they continue to turn against America, why not?

It has never occurred to you to question why educated people tend to be Democrats?

That has not been the case in my experience. Democrats tend to live their lives in Fantasia.

Maybe they've learned something you didn't?

Unlikely. Star Trek and Disney films do not an education make.

Why are people with many years of education more likely to be liberals?

As I said, that has not been the case in my experience.

I am liberal in the classic sense. Democrats tend not to be.

Well, Billy, it's you folks who keep insisting that our universities are full of Democrat/liberal professors brainwashing our precious youth--I wouldn't know; I graduated 20+ years ago and haven't been back on a college campus since. I was taking your word for it.

I graduated 40+ years ago, and I myself do occasionally visit college campuses.

Regardless, I've had ample opportunity to speak to the whippersnappers over the years, and the profs, and ignorance has been on an astonishing upsliding scale for decades.

The Millennials are by far the overall dumbest group I've yet encountered. Idiocracy indeed. They can't tie their shoes without texting for instructions.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's silly.

You cannot show why her statement about the lack of Trump's legitimacy as a candidate is wrong.

Try to stay on track. Trolling me only shows your weakness of argument.

I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?

You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.

Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to

Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.

Comrade Starkiev

We concur. Johnson is NOT a Libertarian.

Trump is indeed a fascist -

BUT

our most important and basic right

the right to bear arms is secured with him


.

You have no 2nd Amendment right to have a bazooka, a recoiless rifle, a mortar, a tank, etc., unless you meet federal (regulation and registration and qualification) guidelines.

You are misuing the OP to quarrel something that has no bearing to it. Stop.

 

[JakeStarkey]

It's funny that you're just figuring that out.

Her appointed, everything she's written, her life story... and you're just now learning who she is.

Our schools suck in many parts of the country.

Listen to Obama's speech, we have so many angry, frightened Trumpies because our schools don't teach people how to think.

Just? I've had you people pegged since high school.

As to education, the system needs to wrested away from the Democrats, by whatever means.

Maybe y'all could shoot them or put them in prison, like the Chinese did during the revolution.

If they continue to turn against America, why not?

It has never occurred to you to question why educated people tend to be Democrats?

That has not been the case in my experience. Democrats tend to live their lives in Fantasia.

Maybe they've learned something you didn't?

Unlikely. Star Trek and Disney films do not an education make.

Why are people with many years of education more likely to be liberals?

As I said, that has not been the case in my experience.

I am liberal in the classic sense. Democrats tend not to be.

Well, Billy, it's you folks who keep insisting that our universities are full of Democrat/liberal professors brainwashing our precious youth--I wouldn't know; I graduated 20+ years ago and haven't been back on a college campus since. I was taking your word for it.

I graduated 40+ years ago, and I myself do occasionally visit college campuses.

Regardless, I've had ample opportunity to speak to the whippersnappers over the years, and the profs, and ignorance has been on an astonishing upsliding scale for decades.

The Millennials are by far the overall dumbest group I've yet encountered. Idiocracy indeed. They can't tie their shoes without texting for instructions.

And they overwhelmingly despise Trump.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

compare Trumps outstanding service to the country creating wealth for many and jobs for even more with Ginsberg's contributions that actually helped the working class.

That's silly. Trump cost hundreds of thousands their jobs in bankruptcies and closings. He has done no public service for the country. He is temperamentally unqualified for the presidency. Any comment about "at least he is better than Hillary" is similar to "there both really bad losers, but Donald is better," is ludicrous.

Neither are qualified.

Vote Johnson/Weld.

I see fake is quoting the "outyourass" poll. The source of most of his statistics.

I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.

Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Compare Ginsberg's outstanding service as a jurist to her country with Trump's service to his country.

compare Trumps outstanding service to the country creating wealth for many and jobs for even more with Ginsberg's contributions that actually helped the working class.

That's silly. Trump cost hundreds of thousands their jobs in bankruptcies and closings. He has done no public service for the country. He is temperamentally unqualified for the presidency. Any comment about "at least he is better than Hillary" is similar to "there both really bad losers, but Donald is better," is ludicrous.

Neither are qualified.

Vote Johnson/Weld.

I see fake is quoting the "outyourass" poll. The source of most of his statistics.

I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.

Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.

That is not the problem.