The great disconnect.
1.The Left begins with, and requires, contempt for and repugnance of, religion, or, one might say, the difference between the religion of militant secularism and the religion of our founders, the Judeo-Christian variety, can be seen in the meaning of the term 'reward.'
For the believer in the latter, it is spiritual, an afterlife. For our Liberals/Democrats secularists, it is overflowing material wealth in the here and now.
Or, as the adage concludes: The only place one finds justice is the dictionary or the cemetery.
2. One example of how Liberals go about rewarding their propagandists/soldiers, and I mean 'soldier' as in Mafia soldier, is via the publishing industry. No matter how they sell, or even if they sell, Liberal authors get hugely outsized book advances, which “are pure wealth transfers to liberal gabbers.” [Coulter, “Slander,” chapter six.]
3. If one works for a Democrat Congressman, then the next stop is your own show on CNN, MSNBC, etc….for beaucoup bucks. They are rewarded for lying to the public.
4. Take a look at Vanity Fair’s current feature article, ‘Obamoguls,’ which proves my premise here. The article is a glowing ‘panegyric,’[a published text in praise] and ‘hagiographic’ [ excessively flattering depiction] of the Obamas. One could get diabetes from this article. “It’s Got the Democratic Halo, but There’s This Bourgeois Element”: Meet the Obamoguls
5. In full disclosure, as I have asked this in other posts: Let’s begin with a challenge: aside from skin-color, what are the reasons that Barack Obama deserved the Democrat nomination to the presidency? Accomplishments? Political victory track record? Wealth accumulation? Nope…none of these.
He was served up on this platter: ‘…you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
If any Obama-voter can’t provide a cogent answer, it is proof of the charge that Liberals/Democrats use emotion rather than intellect in choosing a candidate. And the party knows how to use it: the only number greater than infinity is how often they used the term ‘racist.’ That's how they silenced any critiques.
what are the reasons that Barack Obama deserved the nomination to the presidency?
But…..the party has provided boundless praise and wealth to this pedestrian couple.
6. “It may be particularly galling to Trump that, where it took him the better part of two decades to become a multiplatform media powerhouse, Barack and Michelle Obama have essentially done it in two years. In addition to their political and philanthropic activity, they’re making movies and shows for Netflix, podcasts for Spotify, best sellers for Penguin Random House, mega-events for Live Nation—and making themselves super rich along the way. Their explosion of personal wealth may be head-turning, but the Obamas have managed to do it without sacrificing too much of their ethical cachet.
Their budding media portfolio has a certain recombinant brilliance, fusing familiar elements to create a new cultural prestige—something with the potential to further magnify the Obamas’ already outsize influence.” “It’s Got the Democratic Halo, but There’s This Bourgeois Element”: Meet the Obamoguls
Liberals will love the overflowing of the Obama’s cup…..but you will not be able to explain why they deserve these rewards.
1.The Left begins with, and requires, contempt for and repugnance of, religion, or, one might say, the difference between the religion of militant secularism and the religion of our founders, the Judeo-Christian variety, can be seen in the meaning of the term 'reward.'
For the believer in the latter, it is spiritual, an afterlife. For our Liberals/Democrats secularists, it is overflowing material wealth in the here and now.
Or, as the adage concludes: The only place one finds justice is the dictionary or the cemetery.
2. One example of how Liberals go about rewarding their propagandists/soldiers, and I mean 'soldier' as in Mafia soldier, is via the publishing industry. No matter how they sell, or even if they sell, Liberal authors get hugely outsized book advances, which “are pure wealth transfers to liberal gabbers.” [Coulter, “Slander,” chapter six.]
3. If one works for a Democrat Congressman, then the next stop is your own show on CNN, MSNBC, etc….for beaucoup bucks. They are rewarded for lying to the public.
4. Take a look at Vanity Fair’s current feature article, ‘Obamoguls,’ which proves my premise here. The article is a glowing ‘panegyric,’[a published text in praise] and ‘hagiographic’ [ excessively flattering depiction] of the Obamas. One could get diabetes from this article. “It’s Got the Democratic Halo, but There’s This Bourgeois Element”: Meet the Obamoguls
5. In full disclosure, as I have asked this in other posts: Let’s begin with a challenge: aside from skin-color, what are the reasons that Barack Obama deserved the Democrat nomination to the presidency? Accomplishments? Political victory track record? Wealth accumulation? Nope…none of these.
He was served up on this platter: ‘…you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
If any Obama-voter can’t provide a cogent answer, it is proof of the charge that Liberals/Democrats use emotion rather than intellect in choosing a candidate. And the party knows how to use it: the only number greater than infinity is how often they used the term ‘racist.’ That's how they silenced any critiques.
what are the reasons that Barack Obama deserved the nomination to the presidency?
But…..the party has provided boundless praise and wealth to this pedestrian couple.
6. “It may be particularly galling to Trump that, where it took him the better part of two decades to become a multiplatform media powerhouse, Barack and Michelle Obama have essentially done it in two years. In addition to their political and philanthropic activity, they’re making movies and shows for Netflix, podcasts for Spotify, best sellers for Penguin Random House, mega-events for Live Nation—and making themselves super rich along the way. Their explosion of personal wealth may be head-turning, but the Obamas have managed to do it without sacrificing too much of their ethical cachet.
Their budding media portfolio has a certain recombinant brilliance, fusing familiar elements to create a new cultural prestige—something with the potential to further magnify the Obamas’ already outsize influence.” “It’s Got the Democratic Halo, but There’s This Bourgeois Element”: Meet the Obamoguls
Liberals will love the overflowing of the Obama’s cup…..but you will not be able to explain why they deserve these rewards.
Last edited:
