Just Why Are People Against The Trump Agenda?

[JoeB131]

why is it up to you to force people to renounce anything at all? why do *you* or *your side* get to make that call after LOSING an election?

isn't that ... fascism? forcing people to think like you OR ELSE??? isn't that what the left accuses OTHERS of doing? strongarming people into their mindset?

yet "just renounce trump and it all be better!!!"

no it won't. it just validates the methods the left is using to get their way and this has nothing to do about trump at this point. not to me and not to many like me. but it has EVERYTHING to do with people demanding to get their way or there will be a foot stomping!

stomp that foot like a baby man. stomp it. trump won. and until this "evidence" proves one thing or another, i'm sure you'll push on with GUILTY w/o a shred of proof. you know the proof the fbi has but has not released yet liberals use it daily against him.

Trump didn't win. he lost by 3 million votes.

Just like the last guy who lost the popular vote gave us Iraq, the Great Recession and Katrina.

So how badly does Trump have to **** things up before you guys (and yes, i include those of you who voted for third parties) admit you made a mistake?

 

[emilynghiem]

You see so often people here ripping on Trump and those who voted for him. Just what are they against? Here is the Trump Agenda as he campaigned on and what he has worked on since in office:

* Economy & Jobs
* Lower Taxes & Tax Reform
* Repeal & Replace Obamacare
* A Stronger Military
* To Defeat Radical Islam & ISIS
* Energy Independence
* Returning control of Education back to the Individual States
* Cutting the Size of Government
* Draining the Swamp

Therefore, it goes without saying that those who are dead set against Trump are not for a better economy, better jobs, lower taxes, tax reform, better, cheaper healthcare, building up our military strength in response to growing threats, defeating terrorism, improved education, or reducing the burden of massive government costs, oversight, regulation and corruption.

They might say they are, but they just don’t feel Trump’s the guy to get it done, but, Trump IS the president, so, if it’s going to get done these next for years, you would think they would want him to succeed! Then there is this futile wish that somehow he will be removed from office which will never happen, so you would think they would want him to succeed! But they don’t. They hate him.

But what if Hillary had won---- would they be hating and lambasting her? You know they would not, even though she ran on essentially Obama’s platform and wouldn’t have done any of the above.

So, were any of the Trump Hater’s jumping ugly when Obama was in office? I seriously doubt it. Let us look at Obama’s legacy that they supported and would have likely gone on with Hillary; what was Obama’s legacy that they are so unhappy Trump is in office to change?

* Lowest Labor Participation Rate Since the 1970’s
* 95 million out of the Labour Force
* Worst Recovery Since the 1940’s
* Lowest Home Ownership 51 Years
* 13 Million More Americans on Food Stamps
* 43 Million In Poverty
* 1 in 5 Families Had No One Working
* 1 in 6 Men ages 18-34 In Jail Or Out Of Work
* More National Debt Accumulated than All Previous Administrations Combined

(source: Census Bureau & Dept. of Treasury)

Yep. This is what they were fine with during the Obama years, would have been OK with Hillary continuing, and are now railing against Trump for trying to fix? And their reasons?

Trump has blond hair.
He is more rich than they.
His wife is more beautiful than theirs.
His kids are smarter and better looking. Rich too.
He texts.
He is blunt.
He means what he says.
He does what means.
He works 20 hours a day.
He holds people accountable.
He is real successful in getting things done he sets out to do.
He gets things done rather than just talk about doing them.

And their rationale? With a gale-force wind of opposition against him from those who stand to lose by his cleaning up Washington, they complain that he hasn’t already accomplished everything 4 months into his election.

Dear @tobfreak
It is more fundamental than that.
you are like asking why are atheists against what Christians are doing good,
or why do Christians distrust and oppose atheists and secularists so much?

They don't start off with the same approach, cannot relate to the other,
and fear the other GROUP is doing more harm than good from the onset.

Then, next, anyone who REPRESENTS that GROUP they distrust and blame so much
is then targeted as part of the problem.

if you aren't part of the solution, if you tolerate the problem,
then you are responsible for enabling the problem to continue!

Both sides of any conflict distrust each other, it's MUTUAL.
The FEAR makes it more divisive, where it's easier to project
blame back and forth rather than sort out both sides which is intimidating if not overwhelming.
The fear of confronting the fear and conflict then FUELS the division and competing
to "blame the other group" as the cause of the problems and make THEM wrong.

so both sides fuel this divisive relationship of "unfair competition"
to beat each other down for points instead of actually
SOLVING THE PROBLEMS THAT ARE MUTUAL.

Dr. King Jr. Summarized it best:
Quote of the Week: Martin Luther King Jr.

"Men often hate each other because they fear each other;
they fear each other because they don't know each other;
they don't know each other because they can not communicate;
they can not communicate because they are separated."

When we understand the FEAR is MUTUAL
that's when we can take down the barriers
and start confronting and dealing with the reality,
the real work to dismantle ALL the factors that
went into a conflict, so we can solve the problem
step by step. Instead of lumping them all into one
huge massive block and blaming it on someone else to fix.

Trump REPRESENTS entire problems and groups
being blamed for why we aren't making more progress
to solve problems. So the focus and attacks on are
on TRUMP but the problems are really bigger and more widespread.

It will take everyone dismantling the blocks and reworking
our resources and relations to build SOLUTIONS.

Blame is not going to solve anything.
but political pressure responds to negative hype
so people are using that as a weapon to push for
change in the media by protesting publicly.

Protesting doesn't solve problems either.
But it draws media and public attention to what
is being protested, and if we investigate and follow up,
we can work through the root problems and seek solutions.

That is where we are heading, but right now
people are in the protest phase, yelling about the problems.

As we follow through with the grievance and petitioning
process to solve the problems being protested,
the right solutions will come forth that will unite people
in a positive direction.

Give it time, and the wheat will be threshed from the chaff.
The problems will be brought out, but so will the solutions.
The bad will be exposed, but so will the good that it takes to correct the wrongs.

So there will be justice and peace, when all the truth comes
out, and we are all compelled to address and resolve the issues
that have been suppressed and dumped back and forth.

At some point we have to work together to clean up these messes.

so we are in the midst of the process of calling this out,
bringing all grievances and issues to public light,
and from there, we can sort through all the dirty laundry
and formulate plans to clean up past damage, prevent
further debts, and in the process stop the division and
obstruction that otherwise prevents collaboration on sustainable
solutions, prevention and correction that will benefit everyone.

 

[emilynghiem]

why is it up to you to force people to renounce anything at all? why do *you* or *your side* get to make that call after LOSING an election?

isn't that ... fascism? forcing people to think like you OR ELSE??? isn't that what the left accuses OTHERS of doing? strongarming people into their mindset?

yet "just renounce trump and it all be better!!!"

no it won't. it just validates the methods the left is using to get their way and this has nothing to do about trump at this point. not to me and not to many like me. but it has EVERYTHING to do with people demanding to get their way or there will be a foot stomping!

stomp that foot like a baby man. stomp it. trump won. and until this "evidence" proves one thing or another, i'm sure you'll push on with GUILTY w/o a shred of proof. you know the proof the fbi has but has not released yet liberals use it daily against him.

Trump didn't win. he lost by 3 million votes.

Just like the last guy who lost the popular vote gave us Iraq, the Great Recession and Katrina.

So how badly does Trump have to **** things up before you guys (and yes, i include those of you who voted for third parties) admit you made a mistake?

Dear JoeB131:
you are counting the popular votes under an election run by Electoral votes.
If you want to run the election by popular votes, you would have to
SET UP THE ELECTION under those terms. So the candidates would have
the opportunity to campaign and strategize based on POPULAR votes.

That is a different election system than what was used.

If you want a system that would count both at the same time,
we could have a PREFERENTIAL vote instead of winner-take-all by majority rule.

So THAT WAY, if someone's first choice was Gary Johnson before Trump,
or Trump then Gary Johnson, THAT ISN'T A VOTE FOR HILLARY if one comes in second.
That person's vote still goes to someone OTHER THAN Hillary or Jill Stein, etc.

Another way:
Let each state divide its votes by DISTRICT, so not all the E votes go to one winner,
but they depend on who wins each DISTRICT.

so if STATES are going to throw their E votes to the winning candidate,
why not let DISTRICTS do that.

There are ways to do this JoeB131 but it
HAS TO BE AGREED UPON
BEFORE THE ELECTION IS CONDUCTED UNDER *THOSE* TERMS

Otherwise it's not fair: You can't take the popular votes from NY and CA
"OUT OF CONTEXT WITH THE SYSTEM" by which the election and votes were
conducted and counted. You are changing the meaning of the votes midstream.

Do you understand -- You'd have to change the CONTEXT
first to be based on popular vote IF you are going to count based on THAT factor by itself!

What I suggest is the candidates win BOTH the popular and
the Electoral Vote -- they have to win the people and the states
in a clear majority such as 60-75% or else there is a runoff
(again the runoff can be done by PREFERENTIAL voting
so if no candidates get the Supermajority, then the votes
are taken in preferential order to see who people preferred
had their first choice not won. In the case of this election,
the first round might have had more Gary Johnson's and
Jill Stein votes, if people knew their second choice vote
would get their vote and not the candidate they were voting
against either Trump or Clinton; and then the race would be
between if Trump or Clinton was more people's second choice
instead of ASSUMING if Trump didn't win it would go to Clinton
or if Clinton didn't win it would go to Trump. We could see those numbers instead of guessing)

You may not like my personal idea on this.
But I believe if we mixed the ticket and included candidates/leaders
from mixed parties to fill the positions and cabinets,
we could have more win/win situations and not letting
one party dominate at a time while the others go without equal representation.

 

[Oldstyle]

Someone spread lies about Hillary? What lies are those, Joey? Admit it...what did Hillary in wasn't lies...it was the truth. The reason those hacks hurt her so badly is because they revealed how corrupt she really is.

No, a lot of things were taken out of context, and there were a shitload of claims about emails that turned out to be bullshit. Funny Trump isn't prosecuting her like he promised you rubes, isn't it?

As for "intellect"? Supposedly, Barack Obama possessed great "intellect" and he didn't have a clue how to get a job done. Getting things done is what Trump does. Unlike Barry who talked about solving things and never even attempted to do so...Trump is actively working on them.

Really compare Obama's first 100 days to the Orange Shitgibbon's first 100 days.

Donald Trump vs. Barack Obama: Whose 100 days were better?

In his first 100 days, Obama passed the Stimulus, wound down the Iraq War, escalated the Afghan War, passed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, saved the Auto industry...

Now of course, you guys think these are all bad thing because the Black Guy Did It, but he had actual legislative accomplishments.

What was taken out of context? Did Hillary not get the questions that CNN would ask in their debate ahead of time? Did her supporters at the DNC not conspire to kneecap Bernie Sanders? Did Hillary not lie when she said she'd turned over everything she had regarding Benghazi? Did Hillary not illegally set up two private servers in her home (at great expense!) so that she could run the State Department off the "official grid"?

Out of context? That's an amusing excuse, Joey!

 

[Kondor3]

why is it up to you to force people to renounce anything at all? why do *you* or *your side* get to make that call after LOSING an election?

isn't that ... fascism? forcing people to think like you OR ELSE??? isn't that what the left accuses OTHERS of doing? strongarming people into their mindset?

yet "just renounce trump and it all be better!!!"

no it won't. it just validates the methods the left is using to get their way and this has nothing to do about trump at this point. not to me and not to many like me. but it has EVERYTHING to do with people demanding to get their way or there will be a foot stomping!

stomp that foot like a baby man. stomp it. trump won. and until this "evidence" proves one thing or another, i'm sure you'll push on with GUILTY w/o a shred of proof. you know the proof the fbi has but has not released yet liberals use it daily against him.

Trump didn't win. he lost by 3 million votes.

Just like the last guy who lost the popular vote gave us Iraq, the Great Recession and Katrina.

So how badly does Trump have to **** things up before you guys (and yes, i include those of you who voted for third parties) admit you made a mistake?

Probably right after the Democratic National Committee kisses and makes-up with White Straight Christian Middle America.

 

[danielpalos]

Here is one reason poor people are against The Trump Agenda:

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018 that would cut deeply into programs for the poor, from health care and food stamps to student loans and disability payments, laying out an austere vision for reordering the nation’s priorities.--https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/trump-budget-cuts.html?_r=0

The rich keep getting their tax breaks, bailouts, and keeping their bonuses (while on means tested corporate welfare), while the poor only seem to get poorer.

 

[CowboyTed]

I voted for Trump. He lost me a few weeks ago. Investigate Trump and if need be, impeach him.

Hey look! The left won somebody over. I guess Joseph Goebbels was right when he said: "Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth" (at least to the weak and gullible).

How many GOP supporters still think there was WMD in Iraq?

I think in the last poll 2/3 GOP supporters thought Comey was fired because of Hillary...

Continuously the Right here have been shown to being either misinformed (or lying) and when presented with hard evidence they restore to insults... They find it very hard to justify their position when the ground they are standing on comes from beneath them...

 

[BrokeLoser]

You see so often people here ripping on Trump and those who voted for him. Just what are they against? Here is the Trump Agenda as he campaigned on and what he has worked on since in office:

* Economy & Jobs
* Lower Taxes & Tax Reform
* Repeal & Replace Obamacare
* A Stronger Military
* To Defeat Radical Islam & ISIS
* Energy Independence
* Returning control of Education back to the Individual States
* Cutting the Size of Government
* Draining the Swamp

Therefore, it goes without saying that those who are dead set against Trump are not for a better economy, better jobs, lower taxes, tax reform, better, cheaper healthcare, building up our military strength in response to growing threats, defeating terrorism, improved education, or reducing the burden of massive government costs, oversight, regulation and corruption.

They might say they are, but they just don’t feel Trump’s the guy to get it done, but, Trump IS the president, so, if it’s going to get done these next for years, you would think they would want him to succeed! Then there is this futile wish that somehow he will be removed from office which will never happen, so you would think they would want him to succeed! But they don’t. They hate him.

But what if Hillary had won---- would they be hating and lambasting her? You know they would not, even though she ran on essentially Obama’s platform and wouldn’t have done any of the above.

So, were any of the Trump Hater’s jumping ugly when Obama was in office? I seriously doubt it. Let us look at Obama’s legacy that they supported and would have likely gone on with Hillary; what was Obama’s legacy that they are so unhappy Trump is in office to change?

* Lowest Labor Participation Rate Since the 1970’s
* 95 million out of the Labour Force
* Worst Recovery Since the 1940’s
* Lowest Home Ownership 51 Years
* 13 Million More Americans on Food Stamps
* 43 Million In Poverty
* 1 in 5 Families Had No One Working
* 1 in 6 Men ages 18-34 In Jail Or Out Of Work
* More National Debt Accumulated than All Previous Administrations Combined

(source: Census Bureau & Dept. of Treasury)

Yep. This is what they were fine with during the Obama years, would have been OK with Hillary continuing, and are now railing against Trump for trying to fix? And their reasons?

Trump has blond hair.
He is more rich than they.
His wife is more beautiful than theirs.
His kids are smarter and better looking. Rich too.
He texts.
He is blunt.
He means what he says.
He does what means.
He works 20 hours a day.
He holds people accountable.
He is real successful in getting things done he sets out to do.
He gets things done rather than just talk about doing them.

And their rationale? With a gale-force wind of opposition against him from those who stand to lose by his cleaning up Washington, they complain that he hasn’t already accomplished everything 4 months into his election.

The resistance from the Loons on the left has nothing to do with what Trumps administration seeks to accomplish economically.
To Leftards Trumps demeanor evokes many things they HATE.
Patriotism
Nationalism
Conformity
Normalcy
Accountability
Authority
Law and order
Etc, etc
Trump comes across as if he "sides" with this nations higher grade citizens which is 180 degrees the opposite of how Hussein came across. He doesn't have that nurturing, coddling demeanor that Liberals require and need to feel. Libs want a President to govern on behalf of our lowest grade...it's that whole backward bullshit bottom up mentality.
His campaign tagline drives Liberals nuts (as if they weren't already) "Make America Great Again" implies that old America was great. Liberals hate "old America"...they can't stand the thought of a bunch of likeminded, legitimate, proud REAL American's all pulling their own weight and living in harmony. Libtards honestly thought their whack-job, anything goes free for all would never end or be questioned.
The bottom line is this....Liberals are fully aware that they are a lower class citizen in many ways and if the President seems to be for the normal, productive, legitimate upper class....all hell breaks loose Libtard style!
I don't care how anyone tries to spin it...consider the facts and you'll see for yourself....I speak the truth with no blur.
Haha...sorry Loons...YOU ARE SO FUCKED!

 

[danielpalos]

We should be "taxing our rich into Heaven" merely to "compete" with States of Religion via morals.

 

[bendog]

You see so often people here ripping on Trump and those who voted for him. Just what are they against? Here is the Trump Agenda as he campaigned on and what he has worked on since in office:

* Economy & Jobs
* Lower Taxes & Tax Reform
* Repeal & Replace Obamacare
* A Stronger Military
* To Defeat Radical Islam & ISIS
* Energy Independence
* Returning control of Education back to the Individual States
* Cutting the Size of Government
* Draining the Swamp

Therefore, it goes without saying that those who are dead set against Trump are not for a better economy, better jobs, lower taxes, tax reform, better, cheaper healthcare, building up our military strength in response to growing threats, defeating terrorism, improved education, or reducing the burden of massive government costs, oversight, regulation and corruption.

They might say they are, but they just don’t feel Trump’s the guy to get it done, but, Trump IS the president, so, if it’s going to get done these next for years, you would think they would want him to succeed! Then there is this futile wish that somehow he will be removed from office which will never happen, so you would think they would want him to succeed! But they don’t. They hate him.

But what if Hillary had won---- would they be hating and lambasting her? You know they would not, even though she ran on essentially Obama’s platform and wouldn’t have done any of the above.

So, were any of the Trump Hater’s jumping ugly when Obama was in office? I seriously doubt it. Let us look at Obama’s legacy that they supported and would have likely gone on with Hillary; what was Obama’s legacy that they are so unhappy Trump is in office to change?

* Lowest Labor Participation Rate Since the 1970’s
* 95 million out of the Labour Force
* Worst Recovery Since the 1940’s
* Lowest Home Ownership 51 Years
* 13 Million More Americans on Food Stamps
* 43 Million In Poverty
* 1 in 5 Families Had No One Working
* 1 in 6 Men ages 18-34 In Jail Or Out Of Work
* More National Debt Accumulated than All Previous Administrations Combined

(source: Census Bureau & Dept. of Treasury)

Yep. This is what they were fine with during the Obama years, would have been OK with Hillary continuing, and are now railing against Trump for trying to fix? And their reasons?

Trump has blond hair.
He is more rich than they.
His wife is more beautiful than theirs.
His kids are smarter and better looking. Rich too.
He texts.
He is blunt.
He means what he says.
He does what means.
He works 20 hours a day.
He holds people accountable.
He is real successful in getting things done he sets out to do.
He gets things done rather than just talk about doing them.

And their rationale? With a gale-force wind of opposition against him from those who stand to lose by his cleaning up Washington, they complain that he hasn’t already accomplished everything 4 months into his election.

Losers and plutocrats support the Le Grande Orange

 

[BrokeLoser]

why is it up to you to force people to renounce anything at all? why do *you* or *your side* get to make that call after LOSING an election?

isn't that ... fascism? forcing people to think like you OR ELSE??? isn't that what the left accuses OTHERS of doing? strongarming people into their mindset?

yet "just renounce trump and it all be better!!!"

no it won't. it just validates the methods the left is using to get their way and this has nothing to do about trump at this point. not to me and not to many like me. but it has EVERYTHING to do with people demanding to get their way or there will be a foot stomping!

stomp that foot like a baby man. stomp it. trump won. and until this "evidence" proves one thing or another, i'm sure you'll push on with GUILTY w/o a shred of proof. you know the proof the fbi has but has not released yet liberals use it daily against him.

Trump didn't win. he lost by 3 million votes.

Just like the last guy who lost the popular vote gave us Iraq, the Great Recession and Katrina.

So how badly does Trump have to **** things up before you guys (and yes, i include those of you who voted for third parties) admit you made a mistake?

True story...HRC won Loon York, North Mexico (California), the vote from illegitimates, Feminazi's, low-life's and bottom feeders, weirdos, illegals, men in dresses and the un-Americans.
Trump won the vote from legitimate American's who matter.
Thank God for electoral college policy. Could you imagine if the barely Americans of California and the totally twisted loons of New York could determine our POTUS?
MAKE AMERICA AMERICAN AGAIN!

 

[meaner gene]

Another way:
Let each state divide its votes by DISTRICT, so not all the E votes go to one winner,
but they depend on who wins each DISTRICT.

so if STATES are going to throw their E votes to the winning candidate,
why not let DISTRICTS do that..

Actuallly tha'ts a common sense approach. Since each house district represents one vote in the electoral college, make it actually represent by electing the elector for that district. And that leaves two electors (senatorialy representations) that would be based on the popular vote

 

[BrokeLoser]

Here is one reason poor people are against The Trump Agenda:

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018 that would cut deeply into programs for the poor, from health care and food stamps to student loans and disability payments, laying out an austere vision for reordering the nation’s priorities.--https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/trump-budget-cuts.html?_r=0

The rich keep getting their tax breaks, bailouts, and keeping their bonuses (while on means tested corporate welfare), while the poor only seem to get poorer.

The poor are poor because they have no iQ, no communication skills, no desire to succeed and no sense of accountability. But that's okay...us productive folk need humans pets that count on us to survive. We love working hard so you don't have to.
Open your eyes bud...you will see this with clarity.

 

[meaner gene]

The poor are poor because they have no iQ, no communication skills, no desire to succeed and no sense of accountability.

If Trump had been born to indigent sharecroppers, he would still be one today. But since he was born to real estate tycoons, that's his lot in life

 

[BrokeLoser]

The poor are poor because they have no iQ, no communication skills, no desire to succeed and no sense of accountability.

If Trump had been born to indigent sharecroppers, he would still be one today. But since he was born to real estate tycoons, that's his lot in life

That's exactly what I say about anyone I feel envious of, inferior too or threatened by.

 

[grainbely]

You see so often people here ripping on Trump and those who voted for him. Just what are they against? Here is the Trump Agenda as he campaigned on and what he has worked on since in office:

* Economy & Jobs
* Lower Taxes & Tax Reform
* Repeal & Replace Obamacare
* A Stronger Military
* To Defeat Radical Islam & ISIS
* Energy Independence
* Returning control of Education back to the Individual States
* Cutting the Size of Government
* Draining the Swamp

Therefore, it goes without saying that those who are dead set against Trump are not for a better economy, better jobs, lower taxes, tax reform, better, cheaper healthcare, building up our military strength in response to growing threats, defeating terrorism, improved education, or reducing the burden of massive government costs, oversight, regulation and corruption.

They might say they are, but they just don’t feel Trump’s the guy to get it done, but, Trump IS the president, so, if it’s going to get done these next for years, you would think they would want him to succeed! Then there is this futile wish that somehow he will be removed from office which will never happen, so you would think they would want him to succeed! But they don’t. They hate him.

But what if Hillary had won---- would they be hating and lambasting her? You know they would not, even though she ran on essentially Obama’s platform and wouldn’t have done any of the above.

So, were any of the Trump Hater’s jumping ugly when Obama was in office? I seriously doubt it. Let us look at Obama’s legacy that they supported and would have likely gone on with Hillary; what was Obama’s legacy that they are so unhappy Trump is in office to change?

* Lowest Labor Participation Rate Since the 1970’s
* 95 million out of the Labour Force
* Worst Recovery Since the 1940’s
* Lowest Home Ownership 51 Years
* 13 Million More Americans on Food Stamps
* 43 Million In Poverty
* 1 in 5 Families Had No One Working
* 1 in 6 Men ages 18-34 In Jail Or Out Of Work
* More National Debt Accumulated than All Previous Administrations Combined

(source: Census Bureau & Dept. of Treasury)

Yep. This is what they were fine with during the Obama years, would have been OK with Hillary continuing, and are now railing against Trump for trying to fix? And their reasons?

Trump has blond hair.
He is more rich than they.
His wife is more beautiful than theirs.
His kids are smarter and better looking. Rich too.
He texts.
He is blunt.
He means what he says.
He does what means.
He works 20 hours a day.
He holds people accountable.
He is real successful in getting things done he sets out to do.
He gets things done rather than just talk about doing them.

And their rationale? With a gale-force wind of opposition against him from those who stand to lose by his cleaning up Washington, they complain that he hasn’t already accomplished everything 4 months into his election.

I see you have on the ruby shades already. [emoji23]

Really, each one of your bullets can be dissected and disputed. It's not such a pretty picture if you apply some critical thinking, something that seems to be scarce these days..maybe because it's learned in those liberal cesspool universities.

 

[danielpalos]

Here is one reason poor people are against The Trump Agenda:

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018 that would cut deeply into programs for the poor, from health care and food stamps to student loans and disability payments, laying out an austere vision for reordering the nation’s priorities.--https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/trump-budget-cuts.html?_r=0

The rich keep getting their tax breaks, bailouts, and keeping their bonuses (while on means tested corporate welfare), while the poor only seem to get poorer.

The poor are poor because they have no iQ, no communication skills, no desire to succeed and no sense of accountability. But that's okay...us productive folk need humans pets that count on us to survive. We love working hard so you don't have to.
Open your eyes bud...you will see this with clarity.

Just "standard", "right wing hate on the poor", in the Public Domain, right winger?

 

[meaner gene]

If Trump had been born to indigent sharecroppers, he would still be one today. But since he was born to real estate tycoons, that's his lot in life

That's exactly what I say about anyone I feel envious of, inferior too or threatened by.

Do you vote for peopkle born of wealth handed everything from education to opportunity on a silver platter. Or do you vote for people born poor or underpriviledged, who suceeded dispite their starting position.

 

[toobfreak]

Trump didn't win. he lost by 3 million votes.

You're a jackass. Every word coming out of your mouth is nothing but horsecrap. If Trump didn't win, then who did? WHO IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE? Snopes disputes the 3 million count anyway saying it was only 1.9, and 4 million Dem votes were probably fake, phony, illegal as usual. The Dems don't do anything without lies and cheating. You don't know your laws, you don't know your history, and all people like you do is try to twist reality to suit your fantasy rather than actually go out and meet the real world. If you want to count the popular vote in a LEGITIMATE way, then Trump won the popular vote in THIRTY states to Hillary's only TWENTY.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Here is one reason poor people are against The Trump Agenda:

WASHINGTON — President Trump plans to unveil on Tuesday a $4.1 trillion budget for 2018 that would cut deeply into programs for the poor, from health care and food stamps to student loans and disability payments, laying out an austere vision for reordering the nation’s priorities.--https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/trump-budget-cuts.html?_r=0

The rich keep getting their tax breaks, bailouts, and keeping their bonuses (while on means tested corporate welfare), while the poor only seem to get poorer.

The poor are poor because they have no iQ, no communication skills, no desire to succeed and no sense of accountability. But that's okay...us productive folk need humans pets that count on us to survive. We love working hard so you don't have to.
Open your eyes bud...you will see this with clarity.

Just "standard", "right wing hate on the poor", in the Public Domain, right winger?

Not really...just applying some good ole fashion common sense.
Rather than bad-mouth and attack the wealthy for kicking ass and widening the gap between winners and losers it just seems to make more sense that you harass all your loser buddies to just pull their head from their asses....get educated, learn to ******* speak right, get a job and stay motivated to succeed....TA-DA.
Problem solved...no more begging, whiny little bitches standing before me with a sad face and a hand out. Let this be as simple as it really is...don't be scared.