Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 53,624
- 39,538
- 3,545
This thread again?
You know it's really bad for the Democrats wihen they set G-bot on "manic"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread again?
One of the most sickening displays of cowardly evasiveness occurred just last week when Senator Coons asked four of Trump's judicial nominees if Trump was ineligible under the 22nd Amendment to run for a third term. I bolded judicial because these guys want to be federal judges.
Not one of them had the tiniest, de minimus ounce of courage to say Trump cannot run for a third term.
One example:
COONS: Is President Trump eligible to run for president again in 2028?
MARCK: Senator, with ah, without considering all the facts and looking at everything, depending on what the situation is, this to me strikes as more of a hypothetical of something that could be raised.
COONS: It’s not a hypothetical.
MARCK: Um, I would have to, to review the, the actual wording of it.
Marck couldn't say a simple no. He couldn't even approach a negative. Because Dear Leader is always watching.
Do these spineless sycophants strike anyone as having the balls to provide objective rulings on Trump's illegal activities?
Me, either.
Trump’s judicial nominees are fact-challenged and unfit
Down with Democrat scum, long live Emperor for life Trump!!!King Trump.
You guys said he is a King.
KINGS DO NOT LEAVE OFFICE.
Why leave, the other side's leader is AOCHitler did not LEAVE.
TRUMP IS HITLER.
He will have to lose a world war after he genocides 6 million Jews….but he is also a slave to Israel.

Si'Down with Democrat scum, long live Emperor for life Trump!!!
Even if Trumpstein did run for a third term ... he'd lose by a landslide. He's proven himself to be a fraud and a very stupid one at that.
So rats love him?No
He is beloved by those with a brain
So rats love him?
Nothing loaded about it.Why on earth would he make a summary judgement on a particular case without actually hearing the case?
The question is a loaded one making it all about Trump.
No one being appointed as a judge is going to declare a judgment on a possible upcoming specific case. It would be unprofessional to do so.
This is what democrats do though, they try to force a litmus test for judicial nominees on things like abortion.
So you don't like Trump.People with a brain
They have only read the Second and 10th Amendments.MAGAs have never read it.
In fact, during the hearing when Coons asked one of the judicial appointees about the 22nd Amendment, you could tell by his face he had no idea which one it was.
Coons had to give him a prompt, and then the chickenshit went into lickspittle mode.
No its not, and that's not the topic. If a judge cannot interpret the Constitution, he is unfit.That’s almost up there with a Supreme Court nominee saying I’m not a biologist when asked during confirmation hearing to define what a woman is.
Trump ain’t going nowhere ******No its not, and that's not the topic. If a judge cannot interpret the Constitution, he is unfit.
If Kitanje Jackson were up for Surgeon General, perhaps you would have a point.
Stupid MAGAT.
True. Given what he has done so far, by 2028, he might not even get a vote from his cult.Even if Trumpstein did run for a third term ... he'd lose by a landslide. He's proven himself to be a fraud and a very stupid one at that.