There was never any way to tell if they were 'in compliance,' dunce.
I just proved it.
Uh, you didn't prove anything. You just said, "There's some way they MIGHT be cheating, even though I've offered no proof that they did, and everyone admitted they were complying, even Trump."
Point was, we had an agreement. They were in compliance. We can't afford another war.
Take your time, Ol' Timer,...clean off those specs.....look up the words you don't know.....mull over the fact that there never were, nor were intended to be, any inspections.
Moron.
There were no inspections.
The Obamunists count on morons like you to parrot the party line...'were too!!!!!"
Let's check:
"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are
already focusing on one part in particular: It doesnât authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israelâs
hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett
claims the accord is a âfarceâ because âin order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.â
This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iranâs declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA itâs doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it canât, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the
agreement text.)"
Why Is Iranâs Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq
==============================================
âParticularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.â
âSen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015
âAt non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.â
âSchumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11
=======================================================
" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to âgo and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,â before Iran hides its contents.
A week later, however, the IAEA
rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, âAll information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agencyâs own expertise.â
This wasnât the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "
... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know â or want to know â about Iranâs nuclear program
==============================================================
Proof of the lack of inspections is right here:
âNetanyahu Exposes Iranâs Nuclear Facade
Another secret nuclear facility is revealed as Iran continues to push its nuclear program forward.
⌠Netanyahuâs press conference came hours after the International Atomic Energy Agency revealed that it found traces of uranium from Iranâs secret atomic warehouse.
This latest information comes a year and a half after Netanyahu first revealed Iranâs secret nuclear archive, which exposed Iranâs plan to develop five nuclear warheads as early as 2003. It also comes a year after he exposed an Iranian secret nuclear warehouse in Tehran and asked the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect the site, where he claimed Iran had once stored 33 pounds of radioactive material, which it disguised as rug cleaner. In April, Reuters reported that the agency had inspected the site and took samples for analysis.
A few hours before Netanyahuâs speech, the International Atomic Energy Agency announced the
discovery of traces of uranium from the sample taken at the Tehran warehouse, the same element Iran is enriching and one of the only two fissile elements with which it is possible to develop a nuclear bomb.
Netanyahu responded to the discovery by calling it a direct violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. He also showed satellite images of the warehouse, which illustrate that Iran literally covered it up with gravel.â
Netanyahu Exposes Iranâs Nuclear Facade
It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world.
Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy
==============================================================================
Pompeo slams Iranâs âintimidationâ of IAEA inspector as âoutrageousâ
US secretary of state calls blocking of UN official from nuclear site an âunwarranted act of intimidation,â says alarmed by Tehranâs âlack of adequate cooperationâ
Pompeo slams Iranâs âintimidationâ of IAEA inspector as âoutrageousâ
================================================================
âIsrael's Iran documents show nuclear deal 'was built on lies'
The new secretary of state said the documents were proof "beyond any doubt" that "the Iranian regime was not telling the truth".
"Iran hid a vast atomic archive from the world and from the IAEA - until today," Mr Pompeo added.â
Iran nuclear deal built on lies, says US
======================================================
âAfter Israelâs Netanyahu unveiled 100,000 files proving the existence of Iranâs secret nuclear weapons program, the Iran Dealâs defenders insisted that they had always known that Iran was lying.
Transparency and serious inspections of Iranâs nuclear sites: two things that the Iran Deal doesnât have.
The first thing the Iran Deal did was lock away gobs of information, including about its own side deals. The IAEAâs inspections and Joint Commissionâs proceedings are secret. The IAEA puts out information, like the number of inspections, but without specific locations, they have no context or meaning.
âThe most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever,â Obama called it, âThe most robust inspections and verification regime that weâve ever had,â Ben Rhodes, Obamaâs Iran echo chamber coordinator, claimed. And now itâs even more robust. âFACT: the #IranDeal mandates the most robust nuclear inspections ever peacefully negotiated,â Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz tweeted.
FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.
âIt cuts off all of Iranâs pathways to a bomb,â Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements canât be true.
âUnder this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24â7 access,â Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later,
he also told CNN, âWe never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.â
Moniz, whom the Iran Deal echo chamber trotted out as their expert, didnât just lie to the media. He
had already been
caught lying to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee when he claimed that Iran would only be allowed to keep âonly 300 kilograms of low (3.67 percent) enriched uranium hexafluoride, and will not exceed this level for fifteen years.â
The truth was that a secret exemption allowed Iran to stockpile âunknown quantitiesâ of LEU.
In 2015, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano announced that the IAEA had inspected the Parchin site, a likely home of Iranâs nuclear weapons program. Hereâs how the incredibly robust inspection process went,
according to Amano. âThe Agency has, in certain circumstances, permitted Statesâ representatives to carry out activities in support of the Agencyâs verification work⌠In the case of Parchin, the Iranian side played a part in the sample-taking process by swiping samples.â
What that actually meant was that the Iranians took the samples and gave them to the IAEA.
According to Iranâs atomic spokesman,
the samples were collected âin the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.â
Frontpagemag
There were no inspections.....and that's just the way Hussein Obama and the mullahs wanted it.
