Just Asking, Part 3

[forkup]

How can you oppose putting murderers to death and be fine with killing innocent children via abortion?

Just Asking.


This question comes to us from Town Hall:
20 Questions Liberals Can't Answer

-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to risk their lives to carry a pregnancy to full term if they don't want to?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? When at the same time arguing that the child's wellbeing is in no way your responsbility?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? When the pregnancy itself was forced upon that person?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? While you are perfectly happy borrowing money that the baby will have to pay back to get tax cuts.
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? While at the same time refusing to take the necessary steps to ensure the baby will have a livable planet.

I like this game.

_______

I can see where you would like the game. Your questions tell us all about you.

You are a soulless Free Shit Socialist. Your first few questions establish that. You have not the slightest understanding of the concepts of self-reliance and personal responsibility. For example, no a woman who is raped is not responsible for a resulting pregnancy. But if she is going to get rid of it, she is perosnally responsible for having it done promptly and not in the 8th or ninth month when the BABY feels pain and COULD LIVE if not killed.

Your last couple of questions then complete the picture and establish that you are a Moron.

Really, I just feel I have to say one more thing to a such a person as yourself: **** YOU.

______________________

I see... So when a conservative uses hyperbole to frame the question of abortion it's legitimate? On the other hand, when a liberal does the same thing you feel free to call me names and tell me "**** you"? You are right about one thing. One can establish a lot about a person by what they write. Goodnight MacCauley. Maybe one day you will see the light and learn that calling people names does not make you look like someone has something interesting to say.

____________________

You are right that proffanty is no way to make one's point.

But, sometimes the point is beside the point. Sometimes for particular people, only **** You will do.

____________________

And what pray tell makes me a person that applies to? I replied to this OP using hyperbole, precisely because it was itself hyperbolic in nature. Read the link provided tell me I'm wrong? You took it upon yourself to be insulted. Not for nothing. Read any of my posts. You will find very, very few ad hominem attacks among them. What I will say is this. Want to have a conversation about abortion. I'm game. Want to use hyperbole? I don't mind pretty easy to respond in kind. Insult me and I will just feel like you have no actual arguments.

 

[TRFjr]

How can you oppose putting murderers to death and be fine with killing innocent children via abortion?

Just Asking.


This question comes to us from Town Hall:
20 Questions Liberals Can't Answer

-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to risk their lives to carry a pregnancy to full term if they don't want to?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? When at the same time arguing that the child's wellbeing is in no way your responsbility?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? When the pregnancy itself was forced upon that person?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? While you are perfectly happy borrowing money that they will have to pay back to get tax cuts.
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? While at the same time refusing to take the necessary steps to ensure they will have a livable planet.

I like this game.

you would have had a point if the pregnancy wasn't preventable that the women's decision to have unprotected sex to get pregnant to begin with was not a factor
i will give you a little education
if women cant deal with the possible consequences of having unprotected sex don't have unprotected sex

In the case of rape, the woman doesn't have a choice.
Neither does it in any way address the fact that pregnancy has an inherent risk that you force upon the woman. Forcing someone to risk their life is not something you should do. No matter if I would accept the argument that they are themselves responsible for it.
It also doesn't address the fact that although you want society to impose this child upon the woman, you also (this is an assumption) don't accept that society has a responsibility towards the child once it is born.
Lots of stuff is preventable. That doesn't mean a mistake should change your life in a fundamental way if you can and if it's possible to avoid those consequences.
When a person gets lung cancer from smoking does that mean he should die because it's his own fault?

see I agree with allowing exceptions for rape any other time it was the women decision that caused the pregnancy it was the risk she took and should have accepted

 

[Frankenvoter]

How can you oppose putting murderers to death and be fine with killing innocent children via abortion?

Just Asking.


This question comes to us from Town Hall:
20 Questions Liberals Can't Answer

-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to risk their lives to carry a pregnancy to full term if they don't want to?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? When at the same time arguing that the child's wellbeing is in no way your responsbility?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? When the pregnancy itself was forced upon that person?
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? While you are perfectly happy borrowing money that the baby will have to pay back to get tax cuts.
-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to carry a pregnancy to full term? While at the same time refusing to take the necessary steps to ensure the baby will have a livable planet.

I like this game.

Just asking, why is it only my baby as well, 110%, when you want money for it?

Why is it if you decide you want the baby, and you want me, there's no problem, not for you or me.

But when you decide you want the baby but not me, I'm still on the hook for 18 years, it IS my baby, after all, even though Seth will be taking the role of boy toy for this week and he'll be answering the door with a grin on his face as I hand over the pizza money, because that's all it is, it isn't for "clothes", why are you not required to show reciepts for clothes and school items BTW?

So when you decide you don't want the baby or me, well then it's your body your choice and your gonna go do what you want to do because of your CONVENIENCE whether I like it or not, because it is 110% your decision to terminate that life.

Why is it only my baby too when you want money for it? Just asking.

 

[Terri4Trump]

you can call the unborn what ever name you like but it will never change the fact they are human

BINGO! We have a winner.

Octagenarian, Senior Citizen, Adult, Teenager, Child, Kid, Toddler, Infant, Baby, Fetus, Zygote.... .....the stage of development is irrelevant to the fact that all are human beings, all have the right to life, and killing an innocent human being is murder.

 

[Terri4Trump]

-Just asking. How can you support demanding of a woman to risk their lives to carry a pregnancy to full term if they don't want to?

If a woman - or a man - were in some sort of life threatening situation and they killed a child to save themselves they would be charged with murder. This is no different. That's how, you dumbass.

My question to you is: What sort of sick evil woman would kill her child to save her own sorry ass?