Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
Moron.... how exactly is this the handy work of Democrats? The entire bench of the Alabama state Supreme Court is made up entirely of Republicans...Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
Yes, republican judges......A republican Mueller......A republican DOJ.......
My God, Trump cultists are claiming that they all turned LIBERAL.......lol
Hey einstein. Know what RINO means?
The last thing an illegal is going to do is show up at a voting precinct or welfare office, to say here I am come and get me.---
BS - illegals have a huge incentive to vote. They want dems in power because dems are the open borders and welfare party. They don't worry about a one in a million chance of being caught and paying a fine.
That is not what this thread is about.The creep lost. Get over it.
Is destroying electronic voting records standard procedures?Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
Is destroying electronic voting records standard procedures?Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
Moron.... how exactly is this the handy work of Democrats? The entire bench of the Alabama state Supreme Court is made up entirely of Republicans...Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
- Lyn Stuart (Chief Justice) - Republican
- James Allen Main - Republican
- Tommy Bryan - Republican
- Will Sellers - Republican
- Alisa Kelli Wise - Republican
- Michael F. Bolin - Republican
- Tom Parker - Republican
- Glenn Murdock - Republican
- Greg Shaw - Republican
You RWNJ are entirely crazy.
If it is anything like my precinct the paper copy is not a copy of the individual votes cast it just lists the totals. The actual individual votes stay either on the machine or are downloaded. Not sure how long they keep the individual ballots. It might be against a secret vote to keep them.Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
The paper ballots are kept for 22 months. They are clearing the machines of the digital COPIES of the paper record. Like they do after every election.
And of course the person that allowed this...was the Secretary of State of Alabama. A hardcore republican and Roy Moore supporter.
If it is anything like my precinct the paper copy is not a copy of the individual votes cast it just lists the totals. The actual individual votes stay either on the machine or are downloaded. Not sure how long they keep the individual ballots. It might be against a secret vote to keep them.Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
The paper ballots are kept for 22 months. They are clearing the machines of the digital COPIES of the paper record. Like they do after every election.
And of course the person that allowed this...was the Secretary of State of Alabama. A hardcore republican and Roy Moore supporter.
If it is anything like my precinct the paper copy is not a copy of the individual votes cast it just lists the totals. The actual individual votes stay either on the machine or are downloaded. Not sure how long they keep the individual ballots. It might be against a secret vote to keep them.Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
The paper ballots are kept for 22 months. They are clearing the machines of the digital COPIES of the paper record. Like they do after every election.
And of course the person that allowed this...was the Secretary of State of Alabama. A hardcore republican and Roy Moore supporter.
In Alabama the machines make a copy of the paper ballot. The paper ballot is stored for 22 months. The digital copies get tallied up on election night. After the election, the machines are reset, all digital images of the last election erased, and the machine prepared clean for the next election. Then the machine is put into storage.
Its pretty.....basic.
There's nothing about this case that indicates a conspiracy. Especially since every legal official involved is a Republican. The Secretary of State, plus every sitting judge on the Alabama Supreme Court.
The paper ballots are kept for 22 months. They are clearing the machines of the digital COPIES of the paper record. Like they do after every election.
.
Welfare office? They love those places. That is why over 60% of illegal households are receiving welfare.Bama is deep red . How can there be all this voter fraud under their watch?
Because after 8 years of aunt barry, voter fraud is everywhere. He went on tv the day before the nov 2016 election and told illegals "When you vote, you're a citizen".
The last thing an illegal is going to do is show up at a voting precinct or welfare office, to say here I am come and get me.---
Besides that Alabama kicked out all illegals in 2012.
Alabama law drives out illegal immigrants but also has unexpected consequences
How America's harshest immigration law failed
Is destroying electronic voting records standard procedures?Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
I didn't read why they destroyed the records, I didn't read the whole article, I will admit.
IF the establishment wanted to fix the election this is something they would have to do. Why on Earth would the records be destroyed so quickly? Before appeals could be heard? I smell bananas.
EDIT, I guess I did read all that was available, no talk of why they destroyed the records, there can only be one reason, they are covering up fraud.
Alabama apparently has history on covering election fraud, or at least not investigating it. For this to have happened the Republicans would have had to rigged the system. So now we see, the democrats are OK with election fraud as long as their guy wins. Can't say the Republicans are much better. Bananas anyone?
Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
The paper ballots are kept for 22 months. They are clearing the machines of the digital COPIES of the paper record. Like they do after every election.
And of course the person that allowed this...was the Secretary of State of Alabama. A hardcore republican and Roy Moore supporter.
Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
And may it be pointed out to you again, the paper copy is not the record of individual votes it is the total. Not that it matters, it seems that this might be standard operating procedure not some nefarious conspiracy. But then again, if they don't have to destroy the electronic record so quickly why do it?Told ya. Thousands of illegals voted once again. Dems have to break laws to win. This should be headline news on TV but it will be censored.
Alabama court gives last-minute order that could impede recount procedure
dec 13 2017 Controversy swirled over the mechanics of the Alabama Senate election after the state supreme court intervened at the eleventh hour to give election officials a green light not to preserve electronic ballot records that could form the basis of a recount.
A court in Montgomery, the state capital, issued an injunction on Monday afternoon ordering election officials around the state to preserve digital images of the ballots cast by Alabama voters in the hard-fought contest between controversial Republican Roy Moore and Democrat Doug Jones.
But the supreme court stayed that injunction almost immediately following a protest lodged by Alabama’s chief election official, the secretary of state, John Merrill. Voting rights experts denounced the ruling as a blow to transparency in a state that already has a flawed vote recount procedure and a somewhat checkered history of questionable election outcomes that the state’s senior officials and courts have allowed to go unchallenged. “There’s no legitimate reason not to preserve ballot images,” said Christopher Sautter, a veteran Washington election lawyer who helped the plaintiffs in the case. “It’s neither expensive nor inconvenient. It amounts to flipping a switch.”
Priscilla Duncan, the lead plaintiff in the case, noted with some amazement that the secretary of state’s protest was lodged with the supreme court at 4.38pm and the justices came back with their ruling at 5.18pm. “It’s just unbelievable that they examined the pleadings and got eight judges to concur in half an hour on a Monday afternoon,” she said.
If this were the other way around, the left would be having a total meltdown and crying that our democracy was in jeopardy. Since it's their guy, then who cares about a recount or ensuring that things were on the up and up?
This shit about no paper trail or any means to validate the results is a threat to democracy.
Why the rush to destroy records? Sounds fishy that they are in such a hurry to erase everything. This is how Dems roll.
The paper ballots are kept for 22 months. They are clearing the machines of the digital COPIES of the paper record. Like they do after every election.
And of course the person that allowed this...was the Secretary of State of Alabama. A hardcore republican and Roy Moore supporter.
The Right Wing doesn't need to rely entirely on Fake News.
Gullible idiots like Shooter manage to promote his own idiotic misunderstanding of the facts and his fellow sheeple just (bizarrely) believe what Shooter posts.
Anyone who actually read the article would have read that it was only the electronic records being deleted- and the paper ballots are being kept.
But leave it to the RWNJ to make up an entire story of voter fraud and blame it on Democrats- in a the deepest Red State in the Union.
Welfare office? They love those places. That is why over 60% of illegal households are receiving welfare.Bama is deep red . How can there be all this voter fraud under their watch?
Because after 8 years of aunt barry, voter fraud is everywhere. He went on tv the day before the nov 2016 election and told illegals "When you vote, you're a citizen".
The last thing an illegal is going to do is show up at a voting precinct or welfare office, to say here I am come and get me.---
Besides that Alabama kicked out all illegals in 2012.
Alabama law drives out illegal immigrants but also has unexpected consequences
How America's harshest immigration law failed
Welfare Use by Legal and Illegal Immigrant Households
Illegals can’t get welfare . .
