progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 64,531
- 39,384
- 2,615
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where was this guy when chauvin got rail roaded?
Brought a skateboard to the OK Corral. Probably had his jammies on also.You would think that trying to beat a kid over the head with a skateboard while he has a AR15 is a bad idea. Libatards are really this stupid.
if I were one of the grown ass men in that town I would be embarrassed that a kid did what I should have done,,Whether Ritterhouse should've been out there or not, isn't the legal issue. He had a right to go anywhere he wants. And the 2nd gives him the right to go there armed.
IMO, he was stupid to do so. And was looking for trouble. And he found it.
But legally, he had every right to be there armed. And every right to defend himself at the same time.
There should not even be any charges against him, honestly. There's enough video evidence to show Ritterhouse is innocent of murder or anything else. If he gets found guilty, then having the ability to defend yourself will become an even thinner line. And that's dangerous for any free society.
Mark my words, if he's found innocent, BLM will erupt again. And that moron of a president and his racist VP will probably once again side with the racist BLM.
Oh yeah...and when they do they will be finding even less support come next fall...Whether Ritterhouse should've been out there or not, isn't the legal issue. He had a right to go anywhere he wants. And the 2nd gives him the right to go there armed.
IMO, he was stupid to do so. And was looking for trouble. And he found it.
But legally, he had every right to be there armed. And every right to defend himself at the same time.
There should not even be any charges against him, honestly. There's enough video evidence to show Ritterhouse is innocent of murder or anything else. If he gets found guilty, then having the ability to defend yourself will become an even thinner line. And that's dangerous for any free society.
Mark my words, if he's found innocent, BLM will erupt again. And that moron of a president and his racist VP will probably once again side with the racist BLM.
Remember it was Keith Ellison driving the bus over Chauvin. Wisconsin has more normal people (except for Madison) than Minnesota since Obama loaded it up with Somalians.Where was this guy when chauvin got rail roaded?
What are you talking about? First you justify Chauvin's conviction because there would have been more riots? That is twisted logic YT. If Rittenhouse is found innocent and the rioting starts again the outcome may be way different this time. It is Wisconsin and not Minnesota and it is HUNTING SEASON and the gun for most hunters there are shotguns using deer slugs. Not puny AR15's, those slugs leave massive holes.Whether Ritterhouse should've been out there or not, isn't the legal issue. He had a right to go anywhere he wants. And the 2nd gives him the right to go there armed.
IMO, he was stupid to do so. And was looking for trouble. And he found it.
But legally, he had every right to be there armed. And every right to defend himself at the same time.
There should not even be any charges against him, honestly. There's enough video evidence to show Ritterhouse is innocent of murder or anything else. If he gets found guilty, then having the ability to defend yourself will become an even thinner line. And that's dangerous for any free society.
Mark my words, if he's found innocent, BLM will erupt again. And that moron of a president and his racist VP will probably once again side with the racist BLM.
What are you talking about? First you justify Chauvin's conviction because there would have been more riots? That is twisted logic YT. If Rittenhouse is found innocent and the rioting starts again the outcome may be way different this time. It is Wisconsin and not Minnesota and it is HUNTING SEASON and the gun for most hunters there are shotguns using deer slugs. Not puny AR15's, those slugs leave massive holes.
Exerting his white Privilege in order to stay alive may be a no sale for emotionally addled libbiesI'm not twisting anything. The Chauvin case was about something completely different. Plus the BLM rioters were ready to go as soon as a not guilty verdict came out.
This trial isn't about a cop. It's about a white boy/man protecting himself. Totally different.
Exerting his white Privilege in order to stay alive may be a no sale for emotionally addled libbies
Sounds right. Proving they are victims and Kyle is a murderer is their job.At one point, the judge rebuked Binger for nonchalantly referring to acts of arson. “All we’re talking about is arson, we’re talking about being loud and disorderly,” Binger said of Rosenbaum’s conduct on the night of the rioting.
“I can’t believe some of the things you’re saying,” the judge interjected. “All we’re talking about is arson? Come on.”
JUDGE: Those Allegedly Shot By Rittenhouse Can't Be Called 'Victims' During Trial, 'Rioters' And 'Arsonists' Both More Accurate
Wisconsin Judge Bruce Schroeder laid out the final ground rules on evidence for the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in a pretrial hearing on Monday. Schroeder ruled on several motions from both the prosecution and defense relating to terminology, evidence and use of force experts. The prosecution had...nationalfile.com
Those so called "victims" were criminals. At least one of the idiots was a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.Sounds like a perfect set up to abuse.
Um... you know that's a debunked lie, right? Seriously people... make at least a LITTLE effort to get informed on these topics before popping off.At least one of the idiots was a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.
Um... you know that's a debunked lie, right? Seriously people... make at least a LITTLE effort to get informed on these topics before popping off.
Yep! Thanks for asking.Got a link?
The one with the gun was not illegally armed nor was he a felon. There is a lot of stuff, some accurate some false being said about their past, none of which have any bearing on the events of that night. Being a former criminal does not make it fair game to shoot them, nor does being unsavory. The only one illegally armed was Rittenhouse, and he knew it, but did it anyway. He had no business being there armed and violating curfew, which they all were and the police did nothing except welcome in the vigilantes.Those so called "victims" were criminals. At least one of the idiots was a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.
but trying to kill you does make them fair game,,The one with the gun was not illegally armed nor was he a felon. There is a lot of stuff, some accurate some false being said about their past, none of which have any bearing on the events of that night. Being a former criminal does not make it fair game to shoot them, nor does being unsavory. The only one illegally armed was Rittenhouse, and he knew it, but did it anyway. He had no business being there armed and violating curfew, which they all were and the police did nothing except welcome in the vigilantes.