Judge strikes down North Carolina ultrasound abortion law

Judge strikes down North Carolina ultrasound abortion law - CNN.com

(CNN) -- A North Carolina law that made women who wanted an abortion get an ultrasound, and then have the image described to them, is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Friday.

"The Supreme Court has never held that a state has the power to compel a health care provider to speak, in his or her own voice, the state's ideological message in favor of carrying a pregnancy to term and this court declines to do so today," U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles said in her ruling.

The law required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and place the image in the woman's line of sight. The fetus would then be described in detail, even if the woman asked the provider not to.

Supporters of the law had argued that it would promote childbirth.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups that brought the lawsuit praised the judge's decision.

YAY!

Good news. I had never considered the angle of not allowing the doctor's free speech.

:thup:

Agree with the ruling if not abortion overall.

Think we should limit abortion to instances of rape or health/life of the mother. Other uses of it seem like Plan C contraception. Ending life because you didn't make a guy wear a condom, go on some kind of birth control, then let the guy ejaculate inside your vagina is the woman's fault, not the resulting baby. Killing the baby because Mom's stupid is unjust.
 
Judge strikes down North Carolina ultrasound abortion law - CNN.com

(CNN) -- A North Carolina law that made women who wanted an abortion get an ultrasound, and then have the image described to them, is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Friday.

"The Supreme Court has never held that a state has the power to compel a health care provider to speak, in his or her own voice, the state's ideological message in favor of carrying a pregnancy to term and this court declines to do so today," U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles said in her ruling.

The law required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and place the image in the woman's line of sight. The fetus would then be described in detail, even if the woman asked the provider not to.

Supporters of the law had argued that it would promote childbirth.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups that brought the lawsuit praised the judge's decision.

YAY!

Good news. I had never considered the angle of not allowing the doctor's free speech.

:thup:

Agree with the ruling if not abortion overall.

Think we should limit abortion to instances of rape or health/life of the mother. Other uses of it seem like Plan C contraception. Ending life because you didn't make a guy wear a condom, go on some kind of birth control, then let the guy ejaculate inside your vagina is the woman's fault, not the resulting baby. Killing the baby because Mom's stupid is unjust.
So you plan on putting all pregnant women in jail until they deliver? :dunno:
 
Supporters of the bill reckoned it would guilt trip women into giving birth. But they wouldn't offer a penny to help raise the child, would they?

its about keeping the mother from having to go out of pocket, borrow, leverage her finances/self to raise a child? :eusa_eh:
 
Judge strikes down North Carolina ultrasound abortion law - CNN.com



YAY!

Good news. I had never considered the angle of not allowing the doctor's free speech.

:thup:

Agree with the ruling if not abortion overall.

Think we should limit abortion to instances of rape or health/life of the mother. Other uses of it seem like Plan C contraception. Ending life because you didn't make a guy wear a condom, go on some kind of birth control, then let the guy ejaculate inside your vagina is the woman's fault, not the resulting baby. Killing the baby because Mom's stupid is unjust.
So you plan on putting all pregnant women in jail until they deliver? :dunno:

The doctors are the ones doing the killing and there are less of them.
 
Supporters of the bill reckoned it would guilt trip women into giving birth. But they wouldn't offer a penny to help raise the child, would they?

its about keeping the mother from having to go out of pocket, borrow, leverage her fiances/self to raise a child? :eusa_eh:

To [MENTION=38085]Noomi[/MENTION] being pregnant is a infliction like a STD....

If I have the ability to stop the murder of a one year old, I should not get involved unless I am going to support the child after saving his life. That's the logic being used!
 
Hey dummy since when is a state keeping children from being slaughtered big government? What murder isn't a crime In small governments?

tapatalk post


You still haven't proposed a solution.

Until you do, your ineffectual ranting will continue to be ridiculed.

No go fuck a lightsocket you stupid twat. :thup:

Eeew. Rudolph Hess said stuff like that. Naughty, naughty, naughty, Mr. Manifold.
Speaking of a fetus...
 
Murder is a legal term.

Abortion is a medical procedure.

Let's keep the definition of terms straight here, folks.
 
Homicide, then.

Though people have been sentenced to death for committing murder when the law said what they were doing was legal.

Bad laws that make murder legal do not mean it's not murder. It just means you have a bad law. It's still murder.
 
Of course it's not a lie. Hence, you are a liar.



Murder is murder, regardless of the law. That is how people can be prosecuted (and executed) for war crimes that include legalized killing.
 
Last edited:
Agree with the ruling if not abortion overall.

Think we should limit abortion to instances of rape or health/life of the mother. Other uses of it seem like Plan C contraception. Ending life because you didn't make a guy wear a condom, go on some kind of birth control, then let the guy ejaculate inside your vagina is the woman's fault, not the resulting baby. Killing the baby because Mom's stupid is unjust.
So you plan on putting all pregnant women in jail until they deliver? :dunno:

The doctors are the ones doing the killing and there are less of them.

So you want to tell people what to do? Are you a communist?
 
Homicide, then.

Though people have been sentenced to death for committing murder when the law said what they were doing was legal.

Bad laws that make murder legal do not mean it's not murder. It just means you have a bad law. It's still murder.

Only in your mind.
 
So you plan on putting all pregnant women in jail until they deliver? :dunno:

The doctors are the ones doing the killing and there are less of them.

So you want to tell people what to do? Are you a communist?

LOL You people will say anything to protect your baby killing factories. If abortion is made illegal you charge the doctor or person performing the abortion with murder.....Logic that I know falls on def ears with you Dr Mengele.
 

Forum List

Back
Top