Judge Smith's report concludes that President would have been convicted at trial

[JustAGuy1]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

LOL, moron.

 

[berg80]

He wasn't even a legitimate Special Prosecutor.

For the sake of argument let's say that unproven assertion is true. Smith's legitimacy as a SC does not impact the evidence his investigation revealed. Yet the allegation has been used to attack his legitimacy as a SC. It's a form of character assassination. Which is all trump has to use as a defense since the facts proving his guilt are not in dispute and can not credibly be disputed.

 

[Dragonlady]

I just wrote a paper stating USMB liberals are mentally ill.

Oh and yeah, my paper holds as much merit as this "report"

Someone is REALLY impressed with herself. Get back to us when you've been appointed as a "Special prosecutor".

Jack Smith's report has a whole lot more merit than any of the shit you've ever written.

 

[the watcher]

Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process

Here's the problem with that: the good judge automatically assumes, like the media has repeated endlessly, that the claims were false. No such thing, but it has played well for you. The claims were never really examined no matter how many kangaroo court decisions you can come up with. It is too terrible a thing to address. It will never be addressed.

 

[hadit]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

And now that Quid Pro Joe has shown the way, the President simply needs to issue a bunch of blanket pre-emptive pardons to prevent investigation and prosecution of anyone and everyone that could possibly have been involved in anything nefarious.

 

[berg80]

Here's the problem with that: the good judge automatically assumes, like the media has repeated endlessly, that the claims were false.

It's not an assumption. There is no evidence of outcome determinate fraud.

 

[berg80]

And now that Quid Pro Joe has shown the way, the President simply needs to issue a bunch of blanket pre-emptive pardons to prevent investigation and prosecution of anyone and everyone that could possibly have been involved in anything nefarious.

The thread is about trump's guilt or innocence based on the evidence Smith presents in the indictment. Not pardons.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I'm sure Trump is very concerned now that he is IN POWER and can correct the wrongs done to him by vindictive liars and assorted DemsKKKum vermin who were out to cheat their way back into POWER!! Damn THEM and their enablers and acolytes, Horse Hockey!!

Greg

You sound mentally ill.

Trump is deranged in office and breaking the economy.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Judge Smith's report concludes that President would have been convicted at trial (Before you edit the title)​

Smith wasn't a judge idiot. Now he's nothing but a Biden ex-flunky.

The report is crystal clear.

 

[Blaster]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

Jack Smith is deranged.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

Why do you call him "Judge Smith?" It sounds like something a Trumper would say sarcastically.

Your side lost, get over it.

The world's largest jury found Trump not guilty of any crime whatsoever. The fact that a New York petit jury convicted him shows how carefully that little judge selected its members, rather than showing Trump actually guilty of the charges.

 

[Meathead]

The report is crystal clear.

The only thing that's crystal clear is your idiocy.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Jack Smith is deranged.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why do you call him "Judge Smith?" It sounds like something a Trumper would say sarcastically.

Your side lost, get over it.

The world's largest jury found Trump not guilty of any crime whatsoever. The fact that a New York petit jury convicted him shows how carefully that little judge selected its members, rather than showing Trump actually guilty of the charges.

No, they elected him President, Trump is wrecking the economy, which will lose him the House next year, and then heavy push back begins. His old age will be simply miserable.

 

[the watcher]

The report is crystal clear.

So was OJ's alibi.

 

[Contumacious]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2.

The EVIDENCE would have shown that:

>>>>>>>>>>The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence<<<<<<

" Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

but in DC he would have been convicted anyway because he is Donald J Trump

 

[Nostra]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

Judge smith?

You are an idiot.

 

[Independent thinker]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

Of course he would have. And being turned over on appeal.

 

[Billiejeens]

Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on former President Trump focused on allegations of criminal efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith concluded that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud and used these claims to undermine the democratic process2. The report also highlighted Trump's alleged attempts to pressure officials, including the Vice President, to delay the certification of the election results. However, the case was ultimately dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The report by Special Counsel Jack Smith stated that the evidence against former President Trump was sufficient to secure a conviction at trial. However, the case was dismissed following Trump's re-election, as longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president2. 1.2. pbs.com and newsweek.com

The truth is that Trump knows that he's guilty and that history will judge him accordingly. He may be in the White House for a few years, but he'll be a felon forever.

Not sure if you are actually that stupid.

I know that you are a clown troll, so -

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So was OJ's alibi.

and?