It was more than a personal opinion. It was statements of fact. Try and dispute the facts.
Go ahead. Refute what Judge Kaplan laid out. Try
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration" In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York...
www.usmessageboard.com
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused”
E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."
Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
Judge refuses to dismiss Trump’s defamation suit against ABC News and George Stephanopoulos over rape claim