- Apr 11, 2023
- 43,775
- 21,298
- 2,488
Sure, his opinion has far more legal value than anything you can ever say. You are really stupid.
Judge says Trump libel suit against ABC can go forward. They falsely called him a rapist.
- Thread starter StatesRightsForever
- Start date
MagicMike
Platinum Member
And he doesn't even pay his own legal bills to do this.
He depends upon endless donations from his cultroaches for this.
Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 31,562
- 27,328
- 2,788
I can't imagine Trump losing this.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 43,775
- 21,298
- 2,488
He has already lost it.
StatesRightsForever
Diamond Member
- May 1, 2024
- 1,879
- 2,454
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #25
Trump has a strong case but who knows. Our legal system is so rotten; all judges take bribes all the time. We sure saw that in NY. I'm hoping FL is different.
Absolutely. Hit them in the pocketbook where it counts.
MagicMike
Platinum Member
It's always helpful when we are talking about convicted felon Trump, to fabricate some fantastic story to explain why losing can't possibly ever be HIS fault.
StatesRightsForever
Diamond Member
- May 1, 2024
- 1,879
- 2,454
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #28
Hunter biden is a convicted felon too as is pete rose and martha stewart. All of them guilty of victimless non-violent crimes. We need to redefine felony.It's always helpful when we are talking about convicted felon Trump, to fabricate some fantastic story to explain why losing can't possibly ever be HIS fault.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 43,775
- 21,298
- 2,488
Hunter is not running for President.
- Dec 16, 2017
- 17,707
- 8,791
- 475
It was more than a personal opinion. It was statements of fact. Try and dispute the facts.
Go ahead. Refute what Judge Kaplan laid out. Try
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration" In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York...www.usmessageboard.com
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."
Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
Judge refuses to dismiss Trump’s defamation suit against ABC News and George Stephanopoulos over rape claim
The jury found Trump was not guilty of rape, the judge can’t come back with his own opinion a s say that he was guilty of rape..after the jury said he didn’t especially considering the nature of this case.
Kaplan is trying to influence people that trump WAS guilty of rape when he wasn’t, and we know it’s working because….here we are…
Dante
"The Libido for the Ugly"
Clarification: The judge laid out some facts.
www.motherjones.com
Federally, rape is defined as “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” This broader explanation, while still dependent on penetration, would include assaults using fingers.
A Federal Judge Has Gone to Great Lengths to Make Clear Trump Really Did Rape E. Jean Carroll
Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president’s criminal conduct.
That the jurors did not find that Carroll had proven rape, Kaplan explained, “does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’” “Indeed,” he continued, “as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll
Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.
www.motherjones.com
Federally, rape is defined as “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” This broader explanation, while still dependent on penetration, would include assaults using fingers.
Trump's Lawsuit Against ABC Is Arguing New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
Dante
"The Libido for the Ugly"
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,259
- 31,851
- 3,545
You're a clown.
Dante
"The Libido for the Ugly"
So because of Trump you want crimes redefined? (an admission of him being a convicted felon)
Wow! Fucking funny.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,259
- 31,851
- 3,545
It was all a fake trial to begin with.
- Dec 16, 2017
- 17,707
- 8,791
- 475
Clarification: The judge laid out some facts.
A Federal Judge Has Gone to Great Lengths to Make Clear Trump Really Did Rape E. Jean Carroll
Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president’s criminal conduct.
That the jurors did not find that Carroll had proven rape, Kaplan explained, “does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’” “Indeed,” he continued, “as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll
Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.
Federally, rape is defined as “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” This broader explanation, while still dependent on penetration, would include assaults using fingers.
Trump's Lawsuit Against ABC Is Arguing New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
First, I disagree with the fact they claimed they “proved” anything, because they didn’t. She never proved any of her allegations, this verdict was based on “well do you think he could have done it”…that’s all it was.
It’s basically guilt by assumption, not be evidence.
Dante
"The Libido for the Ugly"
StatesRightsForever
Diamond Member
- May 1, 2024
- 1,879
- 2,454
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #39
Got that right. All rape accusations are evidence-free, but this one was really weak.
StatesRightsForever
Diamond Member
- May 1, 2024
- 1,879
- 2,454
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #40
All rape trials are like that. The accuser never has any evidence. We talk about "innocent until proven guilty," but in rape cases the opposite applies.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
the worst Serial Killer in History : communist and french resistanceman Marcel Petiot , nickname Doctor Satan- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
-
Latest Discussions
-
trump deports 4 year old with stage four cancer.- Latest: Toddsterpatriot
-
-
-
