You just keep throwing up the same garbage without listening. These people ICE is picking up have been in front of judges already. They have deportation orders already. So, it is legal. They already satisfied their 5th amendment rights and the courts have so far agreed. Recently a liberal judge in fact.
We don't care about how many crimes illegal aliens commit in ratio to legal aliens or citizens. That is not the issue. Try to stay on topic. These are illegal meaning they broke the law by crossing illegally. Or, they committed a crime once they got here including not showing up to their assigned court date. You say they need to have a court hearing. Well, the ones that came through at the ports of entry were given court dates. Most have not shown up. That's a huge crime! Felony.
The Commander in Chief can dictate what happens with the military including getting rid of DEI. Judges do not have authority to tell the NG where they have to go and when they have to go. Congress can write laws concerning this. But, judges aren't supposed to write laws. That's what this butt ugly judge just did.
Wrong.
If they had been in front of judges who issued deportation orders, then they never would have had to have been arrested, since they would already have been in custody.
They would have been able to present their side.
And that obvious is not the case.
There have been many mistakes made that would then not have happened.
Like Kilmar, who had a judicial protection order in 2019, and was illegal to deport.
It is obviously illegal to arrest or deport those under DACA, Dream, have anchor babies, etc.
In fact, just having a citizen spouse is enough to legally prevent deportation.
There is NO evidence anyone crossed the border illegally.
They can cross anywhere they want if they are applying for asylum, and if they crossed on a tourist visa that expired, that is not a crime. It is just a civil regulatory violation.
And NO, missing a court date can get you arrested, but is NOT a crime.
You could be in the hospital or just forgot.
That is not criminal since it does not abuse the rights of anyone else.
And a crimes gets its authority only from those it protects from abuse.
The law gives states authority over the National Guard until a rebellion, insurrection, or civil war allows the president to request the governor to allocate the NG to him.
So the judge is correct and does not have to write or change any law.