martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 103,236
- 54,120
- 2,615
It was called flattening the curve. well now the curve is flattened, and we are still stuck in our homes.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order is not unconstitutional
- Thread starter pyetro
- Start date
It was called flattening the curve. well now the curve is flattened, and we are still stuck in our homes.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 65,308
- 57,785
- 3,645
The states are bound by the Constitution. They cannot enforce policies in opposition to it.
there is no delegation of power regarding this that is outlined in the constitution - therefore the power belongs to the states.
Court of claims?
"Court of claims" is attended by one judge.
One judge opinion means nothing. It needs to go to Court of appeals.
Lame response dopey. You don't have to speak to him. Most tea bagger trumpoholics just listen to him blather his rants for their stupidity lessons.
The states are bound by the Constitution. They cannot enforce policies in opposition to it.
there is no delegation of power regarding this that is outlined in the constitution - therefore the power belongs to the states.
Do you realize you're retarded?
Don't answer that. It's rhetorical question.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,844
- 1,465
Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."www.mlive.com
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,555
- 70,668
- 2,645
- Banned
- #50
Oh look mommy, an infectious diseases expert.Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,844
- 1,465
Oh look mommy, an infectious diseases expert.Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
More than you. That’s for sure.
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,555
- 70,668
- 2,645
- Banned
- #52
I know right? You clowns went from being experts on everything Trump to infectious disease experts over night! Crickey!Oh look mommy, an infectious diseases expert.Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
More than you. That’s for sure.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,844
- 1,465
Well, at least I’m not trying to inject Lysol into patients.I know right? You clowns went from being experts on everything Trump to infectious disease experts over night! Crickey!Oh look mommy, an infectious diseases expert.Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
More than you. That’s for sure.
Makes me more competent than the “naturally gifted” Dr Trump.
Well, you know you could listen to him and not listen to what the media says. Of course, you are probably lying about not listening to him. You are addicted to Trump's rhetoric and lies. You defend everything he does every day here on USMB.
Desperado
Diamond Member
- Mar 13, 2012
- 41,421
- 16,586
- 2,300
How about you provide a link to the direct quote where Trump said to inject Lysol into a covid patient?Well, at least I’m not trying to inject Lysol into patients.I know right? You clowns went from being experts on everything Trump to infectious disease experts over night! Crickey!Oh look mommy, an infectious diseases expert.Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
More than you. That’s for sure.
Makes me more competent than the “naturally gifted” Dr Trump.
At least there's people of intelligence in our courts. Hopefully these people won't appeal.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
Judge recognized that governor order "does temporary harm to the constitutional rights", and ruled in favor of Governor anyways. How anything that does harm to constitutional rights can be constitutional? Because it save lives?
OK, let's turn the tables.
For the sake of argument, regardless if you agree or not that abortion is constitutional right, let's just say it is.
Let's say some future governor issue executive temporary "stay-at-home" order, to save lives on unborn babies. Since order is saving lives, and it's in public interest, that would be constitutional. Would you support it?
The morons can not stop using marching order talking points, even long after being shown how ridiculous the talking point is.Why? We are pretty good at managing the flu.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
From the article...
"A Michigan judge on Wednesday found that while Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order does “temporary harm” to the constitutional rights of Michigan residents, the harm doesn’t outweigh the public health risk posed by the coronavirus outbreak. "
Let's issue stay-at-home executive order every year, from January till May, we'll save so many from getting a flu and dying from it.
I'm sorry... let me dumb it down just for you.
If 40 to 80 thousand people die from flu every year, and we can prevent them from getting it by Stay-at-home order, what is preventing government to doing it, if is constitutional?
If this is not simple enough, let me know, I'll get crayons.
We had as many people die in a month from COVID as have died in an entire year from influenza and you still want to believe that they’re equivalent? And that’s AFTER taking extreme measures to limit it.
Does Michigan have a big enough prison to keep all those malcontents?
*****CHUCKLE*****
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,555
- 70,668
- 2,645
- Banned
- #59
View attachment 329967
Does Michigan have a big enough prison to keep all those malcontents?
*****CHUCKLE*****
When they let all the real criminals go they will.
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 105,913
- 156,680
- 3,615
Oh shit, I hear a tRump rally.Everyone but a few idiot tRumplings knew this already.Big setback for conservatives who claimed otherwise.
Gretchen wins.
Judge rules Michigan stay-at-home order doesn’t infringe on constitutional rights
Five Michiganders filed a lawsuit against the "mandatory quarantine."
Baaaaaaaa
Similar threads
