pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,206
- 33,318
- 2,250
As you flail your Pom Poms for a dementia patient and the coconut tree lady.
You voted for them, not me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As you flail your Pom Poms for a dementia patient and the coconut tree lady.
Actually, it's because he lies constantly.
The idea the judge's order is "constitutionally intolerable” is a disingenuous smokescreen for the simple fact that the regime does not want to ask El Salvador to return Garcia. Which it easily could. Because it does not want to set a precedent allowing for the return of other men who were deported without due process. Perhaps because with each admission a deportation was done in error it opens up the regime to massive law suits.
You’re typically befuddled.You voted for them, not me.
Jesus you're a dumbass.Actually, it's because he lies constantly.
The idea the judge's order is "constitutionally intolerable” is a disingenuous smokescreen for the simple fact that the regime does not want to ask El Salvador to return Garcia. Which it easily could. Because it does not want to set a precedent allowing for the return of other men who were deported without due process. Perhaps because with each admission a deportation was done in error it opens up the regime to massive law suits.
I suppose this would be true IF one assumed that individual human rights were things that could only be granted by a king or other ruler, or a government.Illegals do not have due process rights.
I have a simple rule in life. If someone says something that is damaging to themselves when lying has consequences that statement is likely true.Nah. What's said in court isn't always the truth.
Evidence and opinions are two different things.
And these judges are trying to make their opinions our opinions.
Obama/Biden judges don't believe in enforcing the law or even following the law.
That's why they were put on the bench.
Hollie, you are a moronGood gawd you're a moron. The illegal was not "deported to a notorious El Salvador prison", he was deported to his home country.
The "protection from removal" was granted by an immigration judge?On March 15, although ICE was aware of his protection from removal to El Salvador, Abrego Garcia was removed to El Salvador because of an administrative error.
This is how.
They do have the right to Due Process and you just proved it.Illegals do not have due process rights. They get deported until their hearing date.
Clinton deported 12.000,000
Bush deported 10,000,000
Obama deported 7,000,000
Trump-45 deported 2,000,000
Biden let 12,000,000 into the US
Trump-47 will deport ______________
![]()
Yes, Obama deported more people than Trump but context is everything
President Donald Trump wants to deport a lot of people this weekend. "You know what? They came in illegally. They have to go out," he told reporters Friday as he confirmed that planned immigration raids would go ahead in certain cities starting this weekend.www.cnn.com
Yes, Obama deported more people than Trump but context is everything
Aww I hurt your delicate feelings.Hollie, you are a moron
GREENBELT, Md. (AP) — A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to arrange for the return of a Maryland man to the United States after he was mistakenly deported to a notorious El Salvador prison, while a U.S. government attorney was at a loss to explain what happened.
You are a moron.Aww I hurt your delicate feelings.
The fact is, the US did not deport anyone to a “ notorious prison”.
You can cut and paste the same tedious nonsense another dozen times but it doesn’t change your nonsense cut and paste, moron.
So funny to see an impudent judge order POTUS to fly back an illegal
You are a moron. Tell us how many more times you’re going to spam the thread with the same phony cut and paste garbage?You are a moron.
![]()
The US must return a Maryland man mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison, a judge says
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to arrange for the return of a Maryland man to the United States after he was mistakenly deported to a notorious El Salvador prison.apnews.com
The election was stolen, and was only prevented from being stolen again because they stopped them from delivering all of those fake ballots in PA and other states.That and the whole "stolen election" B.S.
No, you can go back and read my posts where long before the election I noted that Biden was no longer anywhere near capable of the position.
But yours is a typical pavlovian response.
I disagree with relegating the country to such lousy choices.
Of course not. The administration sent him in the first place. He is a suspected gang member who entered the country illegally. Why would we want him released and brought back?Actually, it's because he lies constantly.
The idea the judge's order is "constitutionally intolerable” is a disingenuous smokescreen for the simple fact that the regime does not want to ask El Salvador to return Garcia.
So, he's protecting the budget from trial lawyers?Which it easily could. Because it does not want to set a precedent allowing for the return of other men who were deported without due process. Perhaps because with each admission a deportation was done in error it opens up the regime to massive law suits.
You voted for a serial plagiarist who showered with his daughter, right?You voted for the sodomizing, grifting felon, right?
Thank you for that eloquent reply, but Trump's "Remain in Mexico" policy is still governing.I suppose this would be true IF one assumed that individual human rights were things that could only be granted by a king or other ruler, or a government. That is not the way our system of government is set up though. We believe that all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights. Endowed...as in "bestowed by God" just by virtue of being born a human being.
So the theory goes that if you are born with certain rights bestowed upon you by God automatically, no law or government could ever deny you those rights. This philosophy goes back to The Magna-Carta (1215) and forms the basis for our entire system of government.
Actually The SCOTUS has already ruled on this issue so there shouldn't be anymore questions about it.
Eventually, the Supreme Court extended these constitutional protections to all aliens within the United States, including those who entered unlawfully, declaring that aliens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law.
The Court reasoned that aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Thus, the Court determined, [e]ven one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection. Accordingly, notwithstanding Congress’s indisputably broad power to regulate immigration, fundamental due process requirements notably constrained that power with respect to aliens within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
There's nothing fake newsie about what I posted.More sad that this is what we have come to.