With regard to the challenge that Obama does not have legitimate birth and identification papers, Malihi said he found the evidence "unsatisfactory" and "insufficient to support plaintiffs' allegations."
Seeing as how not one of the documents that was sopeonaed ever showed...I don't know how he could rule at all.
BTW, how the heck did Obama get a social security number from Connecticut, a state he never lived in??????
This is very simple. In fact, it's what we've been telling you birthers for years:
Hawaii legally certifies the live birth of it's citizens (as does every state in the nation). Under the "Full Faith and Credit Clause" of the constitution, every other state must accept that. So, if the president has a COLB, it's "game over" for birthers. The President, in fact, does have a COLB as has been verified by the Hawaiian Department of Health (until they are blue in the face) so, short of arguing that the COLB is a forgery, no other arguements - to include school records and SSNs - are relevant. It is not the rest of the world's problem that the racist-ass birthers want to argue with something that is self evident. So, not only could the Judge rule, he could rule when Obama's attorney didn't even bother to show up in court and make a legal argument.
You understand that, correct? The birthers got virtually everything they asked for in this administrative hearing. A "conservative" judge (W. Bush appointment), the chance to put their witnesses on the stand, and two uninterrupted hours to make their argument.
They still lost to an empty table.
Since you guys are bad at detecting the self evident, it's game over for your silly cause.
In regards to the SSN issue. The answer again is simple. This is an alternate reality that Orly Taitz has fabricated out of thin air. The argument, to include her "experts" (that the judge didn't agree were experts) has zero credibility, and that is reflected in the recommendation.
