Judge Merchan

[Curried Goats]

Carrol on appeal, access hearsay.

I don't think you know what hearsay means. How are Trumps own recorded admissions hearsay? They're literally his own words you stupid stupid Bingo!

 

[Mortis]

Merchan and Bragg moving to suspend the case. Trump's under the supremacy clause now.

New York prosecutors are requesting a stay until at least 2029 in New York v. Trump, as the president's defense attorneys prepare to move to dismiss the case entirely.

Prosecutors wrote a letter to Judge Juan Merchan on Tuesday, who agreed last week to grant a stay on all deadlines associated with the conviction proceedings against Trump in the final months before he takes office.

Merchan granted the request, which issues a stay on all deadlines, including the Nov. 26 sentencing date, to consider the effect of his election as president.

Prosecutors request stay in Trump NY case until 2029 as defense plans motion for dismissal 'once and for all'

New York prosecutors are open to dismissing charges against President-elect Donald Trump and are requesting a briefing from his attorneys on their argument to toss the case entirely.

www.foxnews.com

It should have been just thrown out - the case. It holds no merit. Braggs and others know this, but since they want to make it "political" and make it Anti-Trump, it should be dismissed altogether!

 

[ThisIsMe]

Testimony from Carrol, Trump as well as the Access Hollywood tape where Trump admitted to this type of behavior.

I don't see any evidence there. Carols testimony is just that, he word. She offers zero evidence.

The access Hollywood tape does not provide and evidence that trump actually touched anyone. It just shows locker room talk

So, once again, we need evidence that he actually committed an action against her. Testimony isn't enough. She said he did, he said he didn't, so his testimony is just as valid as hers.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I don't think you know what hearsay means. How are Trumps own recorded admissions hearsay? They're literally his own words you stupid stupid Bingo!

Who did trump admit to touching?

 

[Curried Goats]

I don't see any evidence there. Carols testimony is just that, he word. She offers zero evidence.

Who cares what you didn't see you dumb Bingo? You weren't on the jury. I have no idea if you even bothered to look at it. I know the jury did and then sided with Carroll. Facts.

The access Hollywood tape does not provide and evidence that trump actually touched anyone. It just shows locker room talk

It's an admission that he grabs women by the ***** without asking. It doesn't matter if you admit to it in the locker room, the bedroom, or the court room, it's admission all the same.

So, once again, we need evidence that he actually committed an action against her. Testimony isn't enough. She said he did, he said he didn't, so his testimony is just as valid as hers.

We have her testimony which was found to be credible and his which was found to not be credible especially after he claimed E Jean Carrol wasn't his type and then confused her for his ex wife under cross examination. Lying isn't a good look to a jury.

Who did trump admit to touching?

Any woman he wants without asking. Listen to the tape.

 

[Delldude]

They are of public record you moron. Pretend harder you soft snowflakes.

https://ww2.nycourts.gov/people-v-donald-j-trump-criminal-37026

Nice try Pal...................no notice of sentence imposed .......LOL

 

[Curried Goats]

Nice try Pal...................no notice of sentence imposed .......LOL

The sentence is being postponed until he's out of office. The conviction already happened, Soy. Feel better about it though. Maybe one day you can accept it like a big boy.

 

[Rambunctious]

I'm always ready to watch you morons frail about.

Were you ready for the butt kicking you just got... because it was generational and permanent.... the civil war was won in one night...

 

[struth]

You dumb mothers fuckers don't know what due process is. It's not a violation of his due process to hold sentencing on a case he lost because he chose to run for an office that would if he won, delay his prison sentence. The court hasn't to respect the due process afforded the office of the Presidency while Trump has to respect the due process of his guilty verdict. Be salty MAGAts but the law is still the law.

Of course it is, it Denys him the right to appeal. He has a right to do that

 

[ThisIsMe]

Who cares what you didn't see you dumb Bingo? You weren't on the jury. I have no idea if you even bothered to look at it. I know the jury did and then sided with Carroll. Facts.

It's an admission that he grabs women by the ***** without asking. It doesn't matter if you admit to it in the locker room, the bedroom, or the court room, it's admission all the same.

We have her testimony which was found to be credible and his which was found to not be credible especially after he claimed E Jean Carrol wasn't his type and then confused her for his ex wife under cross examination. Lying isn't a good look to a jury.

Any woman he wants without asking. Listen to the tape.

And still zero evidence...... just words. It doesn't matter how you slice it, there was no evidence presented in the trial, only " he said this so is possible"

If there had been evidence, we would have seen it.

You didn't listen to the tape, or, you only heard what you wanted. He said "they LET YOU grab them" when you are a star.

He even said in the tape that he tried to move on one woman and failed, which dispels the idea that he forces himself on women.

How do you know he want just sitting around with other guys bring a show off? Sometimes in those situations, you may have the tendency to stretch the truth, for effect

Even if the access Hollywood tape showed a pattern of behavior, it doesn't implicate him in having any relation with Carol.

if that was the case, ANY woman could make an accusation, and win, based on what happened in the Carol case.

It was a trial devoid of evidence, and decided on one of the lowest burdens of proof you need.

Maybe it's you who is simply trying to read into it. Speaking of read, what about tara reade? Yeah, just dismiss her outright, because she accused biden. Went didn't you all demand a trial. With the burden of proof that you let carol get away with, that means biden also is guilty

 

[Curried Goats]

Were you ready for the butt kicking you just got... because it was generational and permanent.... the civil war was won in one night...

God damn you people are stupid.

You won the popular vote once in decades. Calm down. Act like you've been there before.

 

[Curried Goats]

Of course it is, it Denys him the right to appeal. He has a right to do that

Who's denying him his right to appeal?

 

[Delldude]

The sentence is being postponed until he's out of office. The conviction already happened, Soy. Feel better about it though. Maybe one day you can accept it like a big boy.

Not official until He has been sentenced pal, if that ever happens. Top that off with a successful appeal.

Sorry, didn't mean to get your goat...........

 

[Curried Goats]

And still zero evidence...... just words. It doesn't matter how you slice it, there was no evidence presented in the trial, only " he said this so is possible"

Words are evidence you Dipshit. Have you ever watched a cop show? Law and Order? Heard the Miranda warning read out loud? Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. That isn't something that begins when police have you in custody, it's just them having to remind you before you say something incriminating in front of them. It doesn't really matter who you say it to though it's evidence all the same.

If there had been evidence, we would have seen it.

You heard it. He said he grabs women by the ***** without even asking. That's called assault and sexual abuse and battery.

You didn't listen to the tape, or, you only heard what you wanted. He said "they LET YOU grab them" when you are a star.

Consent comes before your grab women by the ***** not afterwards. He can't testify to how women feel about him grabbing them by the ***** without him asking. That's what's hearsay.

He even said in the tape that he tried to move on one woman and failed, which dispels the idea that he forces himself on women.

So because he didn't assault that woman means he didn't assault others?

How do you know he want just sitting around with other guys bring a show off? Sometimes in those situations, you may have the tendency to stretch the truth, for effect

Why would any decent human being stretch the truth to appear as a sexual assaulter?

Even if the access Hollywood tape showed a pattern of behavior, it doesn't implicate him in having any relation with Carol.

Him lying to the jury didn't help his credibility there.

if that was the case, ANY woman could make an accusation, and win, based on what happened in the Carol case.

How many of them have audio of their assaulter admitting he assaults?

It was a trial devoid of evidence, and decided on one of the lowest burdens of proof you need.

I just described the evidence.

Maybe it's you who is simply trying to read into it. Speaking of read, what about tara reade? Yeah, just dismiss her outright, because she accused biden. Went didn't you all demand a trial. With the burden of proof that you let carol get away with, that means biden also is guilty

Find any quote of me saying I wish to deny Tara Reade anything or just stop make believing as an argument.

 

[Curried Goats]

Not official until He has been sentenced pal, if that ever happens. Top that off with a successful appeal.

Sorry, didn't mean to get your goat...........

He is officially a convicted felon, just awaiting sentencing. None of you ever get my goat with fantasy and make believe arguments. I do find them adorable though.

 

[Delldude]

Words are evidence you Dipshit. Have you ever watched a cop show? Law and Order? Heard the Miranda warning read out loud? Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. That isn't something that begins when police have you in custody, it's just them having to remind you before you say something incriminating in front of them. It doesn't really matter who you say it to though it's evidence all the same.

You heard it. He said he grabs women by the ***** without even asking. That's called assault and sexual abuse and battery.

Consent comes before your grab women by the ***** not afterwards. He can't testify to how women feel about him grabbing them by the ***** without him asking. That's what's hearsay.

So because he didn't assault that woman means he didn't assault others?

Why would any decent human being stretch the truth to appear as a sexual assaulter?

Him lying to the jury didn't help his credibility there.

How many of them have audio of their assaulter admitting he assaults?

I just described the evidence.

Find any quote of me saying I wish to deny Tara Reade anything or just stop make believing as an argument.

What you're saying is you'll be sitting on the edge of your seat for four years.

And we're the one's who are fucked up........

 

[Curried Goats]

What you're saying is you'll be sitting on the edge of your seat for four years.

And we're the one's who are fucked up........

Why would I be sitting on the edge of my seat? Trumps the one with the clock counting down until he's held responsible for his crimes in New York and Georgia. I got all the time in the world. He's got four years.

 

[Delldude]

Why would I be sitting on the edge of my seat? Trumps the one with the clock counting down until he's held responsible for his crimes in New York and Georgia. I got all the time in the world. He's got four years.

LoL..... your postings betray you.

 

[Curried Goats]

LoL..... your postings betray you.

What you imagine my posts to mean only betrays the thing you're fantasizing about my guy. That's only logical.

 

[Delldude]

What you imagine my posts to mean only betrays the thing you're fantasizing about my guy. That's only logical.

Your guy?

You wake up with a hardon?