It is not sentient in the early stage of pregnancy...You are using every liberal talking point available, it is a separate sentient being
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is not sentient in the early stage of pregnancy...You are using every liberal talking point available, it is a separate sentient being
None of these scenarios include taking a life.Why should anyone have to travel to another state to buy a medication?
Would you force diabetics to travel to other states for insulin?
Make cancer patients drive to other states for their drugs?
Already answered this, the federal government sets criminal code for federal territory and the states set criminal code for the states.There are cells that are alive early on of which are live human cells...
Fine, whatever, it is still none of gov't s bees wax.... early on. Point to where the Constitution says it is Congress's decision, or legislature's decision.... It's not!
Because she entered the contract with him at copulation. Should a woman be allowed spike a baby to the cement like a football in spite of its father?And when a man can carry a pregnancy to term then he can decide whether or not to get an abortion.
Why should a woman have to carry a child just because a man wants her to?
I believe some people just need things to complain about 24/7.Yes, people were forced, because there were penalties and restrictions aplenty if you didn't get the jab.
Saying a person wasn't forced but was then fired, denied access to places, or made a pariah is semantics, and fascist ones at that.
Dobbs made the abortion issue one of state law. A state judge interpreting a state abortion law fits within that SCOTUS holding.Abortion will again be legal in Wyoming — at least for now — after a judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a ban that took effect a few days earlier.
Teton County District Court Judge Melissa Owens’ decision halts the ban amid a challenge in her court to a law that took effect Sunday. The Republican-controlled Legislature approved the law despite earlier rulings by Owens that had blocked a previous ban since shortly after it took effect last summer.
An amendment in the Wyoming Constitution says adults have a right to make their own health care decisions, so Republicans enacted a ban that states abortion is not health care. However, Owens said it's up to the courts, not lawmakers, to decide whether that's the case.
Judge halts Wyoming abortion ban days after it took effect
Abortion will again be legal in Wyoming — at least for now — after a judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a ban that took effect a few days earlier. Campaign Action Teton County District Court Judge Melissa Owens’ decision halts the ban amid a...www.dailykos.com
Get ready for it. It's coming.
Once again it is not "wholly separate" if the fetus is attached to the womanRight, she had control, and then got pregnant and is killing a separate life thanks for proving my point.
Both are responsible, or should be, but if she agrees to have sex she should not have the right to kill that wholly separate human being, that is equally part of the father, you are basing everything in emotion.
OK then all we have to do is put embryo in a petri dish and let it live as an entirely separate person for as long as it can.wrong it is a separate human being
None of these scenarios include taking a life.
There is no "contract" to raise a child implicit in consenting to sex.Because she entered the contract with him at copulation. Should a woman be allowed spike a baby to the cement like a football in spite of its father?
Republicans are as usual wrong, of course it's health care.Republicans enacted a ban that states abortion is not health care.
A fetus is a human in God's eyes no matter how much you want to nitpick it.Irrelevant.
A fetus is not a person in the eyes of the law.
Your god has nothing to do with it.A fetus is a human in God's eyes no matter how much you want to nitpick it.
So some states can choose to carry out these killings while others have a perfect right not to.
Individuals know best how to conduct their private lives, not the state - whether to have a child or not or whom to marry.What I don't understand is why liberals are so hot to trot for Abortion-on-demand or Gay "Marriage" and are so anxious to force those who don't think these ideas are that tremendous to do them.
Nothing stops knocked-up broads in Wyoming from crossing the border into Far Left Colorado after all.
Or chicks in trouble in Texas from crossing on over into Juarez to get their babies aborted.
Wholly misandrist.Once again it is not "wholly separate" if the fetus is attached to the woman
And I am not using emotion you are I am stating facts. Females are more important than males when it comes to reproduction so it only makes sense they have more control
Retarded leftoid, it is impossible for killing your patient or their family on purpose to be “healthcare.”Republicans are as usual wrong, of course it's health care.
There sure is when she births the baby and sends him the bill.There is no "contract" to raise a child implicit in consenting to sex.
Fine...and you have no right to force your atheistic beliefs on anyone else either.Your god has nothing to do with it.
FYI not everyone believes in the god you believe in so you have no right to force your religious beliefs on anyone else.
Or, if you don’t want a baby, don’t get pregnant! Amazing.Fine...and you have no right to force your atheistic beliefs on anyone else either.
Thats why its a state issue now. If your state doesn't allow you to kill, drive to the one next door. If I don't like my state killing babies, I can move if I feel like it.
But I really don't care....because its a state by state issue to decide.
Oh now that is totally out of the question because I am simply not self responsible.Or, if you don’t want a baby, don’t get pregnant! Amazing.