Judge Engeron should be disbarred for judicial misconduct.

[meaner gene]

L James and Judge Engeron found out how much campaign cash Trump had hand on and geared his judgement on draining Trump's cash horde..

This is clear election interference, but and dried.

You don't even know you're being played.
Trump in his deposition said he had $400 million in cash. And that was under oath. The judgement was for $350 million, less than what Trump claimed he had. And didn't touch any campaign funds Trump had or was entitled to.

 

[mamooth]

Pity the poor addled Trump cultists.

It's finally dawning on them, that their cult has just been scamming them all along.

They're not taking it well.

It's going to get worse. Addicts can't recover until after they hit rock-bottom.

 

[okfine]

Donald should be a model citizen, but that will never happen.

 

[meaner gene]

And punitive damages are only awarded when the defendant's actions were particularly egregious. What was egregious in the deal between Trump and the banks? It's the same type of deal done by literally millions of people across the entire country on a daily basis.

What was egregious was YEARS and YEARS if not decades, or FRAUDULENT business records. Alan Weisselberg was able to verify the years and extent of fraudulent records, and was fined $1,000,000 for his role.

 

[Man With A Plan]

What was egregious was YEARS and YEARS if not decades, or FRAUDULENT business records. Alan Weisselberg was able to verify the years and extent of fraudulent records, and was fined $1,000,000 for his role.

There is no statute of limitations on back taxes, Gene. Why wasn't Trump charged criminally?

 

[meaner gene]

You're an awful lawyer, Gene! Of course it's about someone being underage. How naive they are doesn't come into play. They can be worldly. They can be aware. IT DOESN'T MATTER! IF THEY'RE UNDERAGE IT'S RAPE!

The other side of that coin is juveniles based on age, not being held for serious crimes like murder. Yet that side of the coin they allow a determination of mental competence to override being under age.

 

[Man With A Plan]

The other side of that coin is juveniles based on age, not being held for serious crimes like murder. Yet that side of the coin they allow a determination of mental competence to override being under age.

Gene? Do yourself a favor! Walk away from that analogy. It was stupid and it's not getting any smarter!

 

[para bellum]

Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) A punitive damages award should have a single-digit ratio to the compensatory damages award. In other words, a ratio of 9:1 is the maximum acceptable. In addition, the court may not consider the defendant's assets to justify an excessive award.

Yep.

So the punitive damages in the AG's case should be $0.00 since the actual damages were $0.00

In the E. Jean Carroll Case, punitive damages should be no more that $45 Million since the actual damages were $5 Million.

In the Mark Stein case the punitive damages should be $9.00 since the actual damages were $1.00

 

[Lisa558]

Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) A punitive damages award should have a single-digit ratio to the compensatory damages award. In other words, a ratio of 9:1 is the maximum acceptable. In addition, the court may not consider the defendant's assets to justify an excessive award.

So given that Trump’s damages to his so-called victim were 0 (they actually made money), 9:1 means Trump should pay 0.

 

[meaner gene]

And are you claiming that the bank had a "naive nature"? Really? I'm sure that will be news to them!

They know they're handicapped by the law from subpoenaing the underlying business records, and personal depositions to verify the information given in business records.

It's no different than if you go into a restaurant, and demanding the right to inspect the kitchen, the food storage, and interview the employees about the safety of the food, including the receipts for the ingredients.

 

[Lisa558]

Yep.

So the punitive damages in the AG's case should be $0.00 since the actual damages were $0.00

In the E. Jean Carroll Case, punitive damages should be no more that $45 Million since the actual damages were $5 Million.

In the Mark Stein case the punitive damages should be $9.00 since the actual damages were $1.00

How was E. Jean Carroll damaged to the tune of $5 million?

 

[meaner gene]

Once he left office they decided to inflict lawfare on him.

The sad thing is for you morons is that if you just left him alone he wouldn't have the support he does now.

They did what Mitch McConnell (leader of the US senate) said they could do after January 6th.

 

[Lisa558]

They know they're handicapped by the law from subpoenaing the underlying business records, and personal depositions to verify the information given in business records.

It's no different than if you go into a restaurant, and demanding the right to inspect the kitchen, the food storage, and interview the employees about the safety of the food, including the receipts for the ingredients.

The bank has no interest in subpoenaing records from Trump. They’re happy with the contract, and made $100 million off of it.

No harm, no foul.

 

[martybegan]

They did what Mitch McConnell (leader of the US senate) said they could do after January 6th.

He said abuse laws in a political witch hunt?

Got a quote for that, mouth breather?

 

[meaner gene]

There is no statute of limitations on back taxes, Gene. Why wasn't Trump charged criminally?

There are statute of limitations on everything except for crimes punishable by death, like murder, rape and treason.

Tax evasion is not one of them.

 

[para bellum]

How was E. Jean Carroll damaged to the tune of $5 million?

That was the jury award. I didn't say it was just. I am only saying the punitive award of $83 Million is much more that the statutory limit.

Many States limit punitive damages to 3:1 or 4:1.

Actual damages in the Stein case was $1, but the punitive award was $1 Million...

 

[meaner gene]

How was E. Jean Carroll damaged to the tune of $5 million?

Read the judgement. It's in there. But pack a lunch, it's probably a hundred pages of excruciating details.

 

[Lisa558]

That was the jury award. I didn't say it was just. I am only saying the punitive award of $83 Million is much more that the statutory limit.

Many States limit punitive damages to 3:1 or 4:1.

Actual damages in the Stein case was $1, but the punitive award was $1 Million...

Post #71. You said actual damages were $5 million.

 

[meaner gene]

The bank has no interest in subpoenaing records from Trump. They’re happy with the contract, and made $100 million off of it.

No harm, no foul.

If the bank could have, they would have taken Trump to court, instead of trusting his business records. Get him under oath for the details in the financial statements.
But that wasn't an option available to them. Hence they were subject to being defrauded by false business records.

 

[meaner gene]

The bank has no interest in subpoenaing records from Trump. They’re happy with the contract, and made $100 million off of it.

No harm, no foul.

No harm no foul means you can drive drunk, as long as you don't injure somebody.