meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,762
- 20,821
- 2,290
Campbell was a guideline, not an absolute.I know what the fuck punitive damages are.
You already showed that 9:1 was the limit as per Campbell
I am pointing out that in all the cases I mentioned, that was not followed- not even close.
At 145:1 it was orders of magnitude from reasonable.
and noted, "few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process.
That in no way places an absolute limit, but is determined case by case
Justices Scalia and Thomas argued that the Due Process Clause provides no substantive protections against excessive or unreasonable awards of punitive damages.