Judge denies stay request, lets ruling stand blocking DOGE efforts to shut down peace institute

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
17,658
Reaction score
10,672
Points
1,280
Location
Twin Falls Idaho
Trump slapped down yet again.
You would think that he'd consider it embarrassing, the sheer number of times the courts have spanked him.
This case was always going to lose...you can't fire people who don't work for you, after all.


A federal judge on Friday denied the Trump administration’s request that she stay her May 19 ruling that returned control of the U.S. Institute of Peace back to its acting president and board.

In a seven-page ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell said the government did not meet any of the four requirements for a stay, including a “strong showing” of whether its request could succeed on the merits.

Howell reiterated her finding that the Institute is not part of the executive branch and is therefore beyond President Donald Trump’s authority to fire its board. She added that the firings also did not follow the law for how a board member of the Institute might be removed by the president.

Most of the board was fired in March during a takeover of the Institute by the Department of Government Efficiency. That action touched off the firing of its acting president, former ambassador George Moose, and subsequently most of the staff. The organization’s headquarters, funded in part by donors, was turned over to the General Services Administration.


In her ruling May 19, Howell concluded that the board was fired illegally and all actions that followed that were therefore “null and void.”
Moose reentered the headquarters Wednesday without incident along with the organization’s outside counsel, George Foote.

The White House was not immediately available for comment. In requesting the stay the government also requested a two-business-day stay to allow for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Howell denied that request.
 
This outfit is funded by the taxpayers in full.

If it isn't a part of the Executive Branch, is this goofy judge suggesting it is part of the judicial branch?

Or the legislative branch?

There is no such thing as a 4th branch of government.
 
What these corrupt judges don't realize that the end result of this by this year end - is reduced powers.
But of course loons like the OP don't care if these judges are abusing their positions - don't care. They just hate Trump.
 
Untitled (11).webp
 
What these corrupt judges don't realize that the end result of this by this year end - is reduced powers.
But of course loons like the OP don't care if these judges are abusing their positions - don't care. They just hate Trump.
Nope.

Just because a judge rules against yer hero does not constitute abuse.

My opinion of Trump one way or the other does not change the law.

I imagine that it's never occurred to you that the reason so many judges, in so many courts, are ruling against Trump is that he's wrong in how he is implementing his agenda?

That he is pushing the legal envelope time and time again?

No matter--as we like to say..the courts will sort it all out~
 
Nope.

Just because a judge rules against yer hero does not constitute abuse.

My opinion of Trump one way or the other does not change the law.

I imagine that it's never occurred to you that the reason so many judges, in so many courts, are ruling against Trump is that he's wrong in how he is implementing his agenda?

That he is pushing the legal envelope time and time again?

No matter--as we like to say..the courts will sort it all out~

There are only two alternatives.

Either the judge is corrupt, or they are incompetent and don't have the legal brains to try a mattress tag defacer here in Pennsylvania- much less try to persecute President Trump and the people.
 
There are only two alternatives.

Either the judge is corrupt, or they are incompetent and don't have the legal brains to try a mattress tag defacer here in Pennsylvania- much less try to persecute President Trump and the people.
...or..the third alternative--that Trump and his administration are consistently 'coloring outside the lines'--and the courts aren't having it~
 
America is getting sick of activist judges trying to usurp executive and legislative power. We need definitive legislative boundaries for these powermongers.
 
Nope.

Just because a judge rules against yer hero does not constitute abuse.

My opinion of Trump one way or the other does not change the law.

I imagine that it's never occurred to you that the reason so many judges, in so many courts, are ruling against Trump is that he's wrong in how he is implementing his agenda?

That he is pushing the legal envelope time and time again?

No matter--as we like to say..the courts will sort it all out~
Nope
Just because a judge rules against the person you hate does not make them a hero.

You don't know law. Clearly.
Judges are given widespread ruling powers. Judges are expected to use discretion and abide by the "spirit of the law".
What is going to happen - PERIOD - is Congress is going to have to step in and reduce judicial powers by state and local judges.
Making it a goddamn shame that it comes to that. Having to make laws to stop judges from abusing powers.
But - like I said - you could care less. You just hate Trump.
 
...or..the third alternative--that Trump and his administration are consistently 'coloring outside the lines'--and the courts aren't having it~

If not the Executive Branch, what branch of the government do you say this USIOP is part of, and who are they responsible to?

The Constitution doesn't give them a right to US tax dollars as an "independent" branch of government.
 
This is to be expected when judge shopping results in activist judges making insane rulings. The result is, the courts have no credibility and are rightfully losing all respect.
 
Nope
Just because a judge rules against the person you hate does not make them a hero.

You don't know law. Clearly.
Judges are given widespread ruling powers. Judges are expected to use discretion and abide by the "spirit of the law".
What is going to happen - PERIOD - is Congress is going to have to step in and reduce judicial powers by state and local judges.
Making it a goddamn shame that it comes to that. Having to make laws to stop judges from abusing powers.
But - like I said - you could care less. You just hate Trump.
Nope..yet again.

I think Trump is incompetent and a clear and present danger to my country...I despise those whom he has empowered far more than I dislike him.

I care deeply about ensuring that the rule of law is respected and obeyed.

The courts are doing their job and they are the last great restraint upon an administration that somehow thinks that it can rule by fiat~
 
This is to be expected when judge shopping results in activist judges making insane rulings. The result is, the courts have no credibility and are rightfully losing all respect.
What the OP is too simple to realize is the pendulum effect.
This won't stand. What is going to happen is Congress is going to limit judicial powers because of this. Wait and see. Guarantee it. By the end of this year, not before summer recess - but after.
And then the pendulum will swing and we will have Presidents abusing their power because judges won't be able to stop them.
The system worked before. Judges act like a check on power. Judges stopping a ruling use to only happen a few time a year - at most. These judges are only going to cause the whole system to change.
 
If not the Executive Branch, what branch of the government do you say this USIOP is part of, and who are they responsible to?

The Constitution doesn't give them a right to US tax dollars as an "independent" branch of government.



The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) is an American independent, nonprofit, national institute funded by the U.S. Congress and tasked with promoting conflict resolution and prevention worldwide.It provides research, analysis, and training to individuals in diplomacy, mediation, and other peace-building measures.

Following years of proposals for a national peace academy, USIP was established in 1984 by congressional legislation signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. It is officially nonpartisan and independent, receiving funding only through a congressional appropriation to prevent outside influence. The institute is governed by a bipartisan board of directors with 15 members, which must include the secretary of defense, the secretary of state, and the president of the National Defense University. The remaining 12 members are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.


The correct way for Trump to have curtailed this entity was to shut off the money.
But, since money had already been allocated by Congress....he tried to kill it by illegally firing the staff.
 
Back
Top Bottom