Judge orders ICE to stop most warrantless immigration arrests in D.C.

[Nobody911]

So, another Dem appointed Distrct Court judge is hell-bent on impeding the rightful exercise of removing illegal aliens.

Oh, and she feels so sorry for them too. But for the American people? Let them eat cake.

​

​

A federal judge issued a stern spanking to the Trump administration on Tuesday, telling it to cut out warrantless arrests in the nation’s capital unless there is clear evidence the migrant is about to flee.​

​

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, also chided the government for labeling illegal immigrants as “alien criminals.” She said being in the country illegally is not, in and of itself, a crime, but rather a civil violation.​

​

“Consequently, viewing all immigrants potentially subject to removal as criminals is, as a legal matter, plain wrong,” she wrote in an 88-page opinion.​

​

...​

​

Judge Howell said immigration arrests in the District of Columbia soared after President Trump ordered his law-and-order crackdown this summer. (Me: Now, now, now, we an't have that!)​

​

And among those arrests were many made without a warrant.​

​

Homeland Security had previously said it used “reasonable suspicion” to make the arrests. Judge Howell said that’s not the standard, though. She said the law requires “probable cause.”​

​

...​

Judge orders ICE to stop most warrantless immigration arrests in D.C.

A federal judge issued a stern spanking to the Trump administration on Tuesday, telling it to cut out warrantless arrests in the nation’s capital unless there is clear evidence the migrant is about to flee.

www.washingtontimes.com

The passage mixes valid legal points with biased, fallacious rhetoric.

Key points:

• Accurate legal claim: The judge’s ruling that warrantless arrests require probable cause (not mere “reasonable suspicion”) and that illegal presence is a civil, not criminal, violation, is consistent with common Fourth Amendment and immigration-law principles. Citing the judge’s written opinion supports this.
• Fact-based reporting vs. opinion: The quoted court facts (increase in arrests, use of warrants vs. warrantless arrests) are factual claims that can be verified; the judge’s legal conclusions are matters of law properly addressed in an opinion.
• Biased framing and ad hominem: The opening lines (“another Dem appointed… hell-bent… feels so sorry… Let them eat cake”) are partisan insults and attack the judge’s motives rather than engaging with the legal reasoning—this is an ad hominem/poisoning-the-well tactic.
• Loaded language: Phrases like “stern spanking” and sarcastic parentheticals trivialize the court’s role and aim to inflame readers rather than analyze the legal merits.
• Legal misunderstanding implied: The writer’s tone suggests that immigration enforcement can override constitutional probable-cause requirements; that conflicts with settled Fourth Amendment protections, which generally apply to federal immigration enforcement too.

- Suggestion for stronger critique (if intended):To criticize the ruling on substance, argue about statutory interpretation, precedent, or public-safety tradeoffs with evidence and legal citations rather than attacking the judge’s politics or using emotive language.

Overall: the factual/legal parts are reasonable; the reasoning is weakened by partisan attacks, rhetorical fallacies, and misunderstandings about constitutional limits on warrantless arrests.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you don't know but are just saying "brown people".

Oh, we do know. They racists not only announced their intentions, they took them to the Supreme Court.

But you go ahead and scramble for a fantasy of why what they said they are doing and what we have caught them doing is not what they are doing.

I mean it seems to be your only hobby. Per the programming.

 

[pknopp]

US-born woman says federal agents chased her back to her home

Video obtained by CNN shows federal agents chasing an American citizen back to her home in Marrero, Louisiana, on Wednesday.

www.cleveland19.com

 

[ThisIsMe]

So, another Dem appointed Distrct Court judge is hell-bent on impeding the rightful exercise of removing illegal aliens.

Oh, and she feels so sorry for them too. But for the American people? Let them eat cake.

​

​

A federal judge issued a stern spanking to the Trump administration on Tuesday, telling it to cut out warrantless arrests in the nation’s capital unless there is clear evidence the migrant is about to flee.​

​

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, also chided the government for labeling illegal immigrants as “alien criminals.” She said being in the country illegally is not, in and of itself, a crime, but rather a civil violation.​

​

“Consequently, viewing all immigrants potentially subject to removal as criminals is, as a legal matter, plain wrong,” she wrote in an 88-page opinion.​

​

...​

​

Judge Howell said immigration arrests in the District of Columbia soared after President Trump ordered his law-and-order crackdown this summer. (Me: Now, now, now, we an't have that!)​

​

And among those arrests were many made without a warrant.​

​

Homeland Security had previously said it used “reasonable suspicion” to make the arrests. Judge Howell said that’s not the standard, though. She said the law requires “probable cause.”​

​

...​

Judge orders ICE to stop most warrantless immigration arrests in D.C.

A federal judge issued a stern spanking to the Trump administration on Tuesday, telling it to cut out warrantless arrests in the nation’s capital unless there is clear evidence the migrant is about to flee.

www.washingtontimes.com

Charge them with 18 USC 1324.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You can't stop and arrest people simply because they are brown.

When you have proof of that, let us know

 

[ThisIsMe]

You sure can, until someone makes you stop.

Show us where it had anything to do with skin color

 

[ThisIsMe]

The white house lawyers counseling ICE of course know this is not legal.

That's kind of the point.

These are test cases.

Ice doesn't need a warrant if they suspect the person is in the country illegally

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Show us where it had anything to do with skin color

Why would I do that? There are many incidents.

And the racists announced their intentions. So you would be pretty stupid to claim they aren't doing that.

Especially after they said they are doing it and took their desire to do it to the SCOTUS.

So yes, I will assume everything the racists do is racist. Weep for them, if you must.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ice doesn't need a warrant if they suspect the person is in the country illegally

Ah, so now we are playing that game where you make up lies, and I am supposed to spend time dispelling them.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I know, screw the Constitution because you are mad.

Huh?? Its BECAUSE you all didn't adhere to cotus this is all happening

 

[ThisIsMe]

It's long been clear the Constitution no longer means anything to you.

 

[pknopp]

Huh?? Its BECAUSE you all didn't adhere to cotus this is all happening

As hard as I might, I simply don't recall that.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You can't stop and arrest people simply because they are brown.

What white hell hole are illegals migrating from by the millions?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I know, screw the Constitution because you are mad.

Show us where it says birthright citizenship in the constitution.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

View attachment 1190079

That youngster doesn’t look like *Joe Biden at all.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Which has nothing to do with conducting indiscriminate roundups of brown people.

Thst is straight out of Nazi Germany.

What white hell holes are millions of illegals coming from?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

BS Filter

Being here undocumented is not a crime.

The crime you mentioned does not apply to those waiting for asylum hearings, etc.

You know, 2/3 of the people your favorite fat rapist is going after.

Nope. As usual you are lying to yourself about asylum laws.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can't stop and arrest people simply because they are brown.

How DARE you accuse them of that!

(After they said it was exactly what they were going to do and have been caught doing over and over and over)