Judge Denies CA Gov. Newsom's request to stop Trump from deploying Marines to LA

[berg80]

The judge denied a motion by Gavin Newsom to stop Trump from sending Marines to LA in his effort to quell the rioting in Los Angeles, which has been going on since late Friday night.

https://www.axios.com/2025/06/10/trump-newsom-national-guard-los-angeles

A hearing is set for Thursday.

 

[pknopp]

Is she the Tuba player?

clarinet.

 

[berg80]

Wouldn't you think the Ca. governor would be glad to see the Marines and end the looting and anarchy? What the hell is wrong with these people?

It was Newsom's place to call in the NG if he thought it was necessary. trump doesn't have the legal right to do so just because he wants to attack a political for in a blue state.

But here's the thing. We are talking about it instead of DOGE's failures, the tariff negotiation failures, the stalled BBB, trump's unpopularity, and the laws the regime has broken.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Nothing I've said has been inconsistent. Pull all you want.

Denial is another thing I understand well. I really despise playing myself up, but I've developed a somewhat predatory instinct. I smell when someone is not being consistent, wrong, or asserting opinions as facts.

It's not hard. Not hard to see you taking inconsistent positions on the law. Here, we can see you taking inconsistent positions on law enforcement. Due Process (via this ruling) vs. Punitive Legal Enforcement (Trump's deployment of National Guard).

 

[TemplarKormac]

It was Newsom's place to call in the NG if he thought it was necessary

It is Newsom's duty to protect his citizens via Article V of the Constitution.

He wasn't. He didn't until Trump brought federalized the National Guard.

 

[pknopp]

Denial is another thing I understand well. I really despise playing myself up, but I've developed a somewhat predatory instinct. I smell when someone is not being consistent, wrong, or asserting opinions as facts.

That smell is obviously something else.

It's not hard. Not hard to see you taking inconsistent positions on the law. Here, we can see you taking inconsistent positions on law enforcement. Due Process (via this ruling) vs. Punitive Legal Enforcement (Trump's deployment of National Guard).

and yet, nothing but endless rambling from you.

 

[struth]

A big for the rule of law and the Union and blow to the Jefferson Newsome and the confederates!

 

[TemplarKormac]

and yet, nothing but endless rambling from you.

Ad hominem. The one key red flag in any argument that's on its last legs.

I can't help your unwillingness or incapability to understand. But that's a failing of yours, not of mine, at least not here.

 

[struth]

It was Newsom's place to call in the NG if he thought it was necessary. trump doesn't have the legal right to do so just because he wants to attack a political for in a blue state.

But here's the thing. We are talking about it instead of DOGE's failures, the tariff negotiation failures, the stalled BBB, trump's unpopularity, and the laws the regime has broken.

Sure it was, but he’s a confederate and waged war, the president as commander and chief can then federalize the guard

If you don’t like the law, call your Congressman, don’t wage war

I thought you all learned this after Lincoln defeated you?

 

[TemplarKormac]

That smell is obviously something else.

Snark, another display of a failing argument.

And thus I reply:

Pretty sure it's from some of the bullshit you've been trying to feed me about how you respect the rule of law so much.

 

[TemplarKormac]

pknopp

Laughter, another sign your argument is failing. But go ahead and press the funny if it makes you feel better.

 

[1srelluc]

pknopp

Laughter, another sign your argument is failing. But go ahead and press the funny if it makes you feel better.

Mostly his posts gets this from me....He does have some entertainment value.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Mostly his posts gets this from me....He does have some entertainment value.

Of course. People who can't debate my points are reduced to laughter.

 

[pknopp]

Of course. People who can't debate my points are reduced to laughter.

You have to first make a point. You are just Rambling. I'm still waiting on you to pull my posts.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You have to first make a point. You are just Rambling. I'm still waiting on you to pull my posts.

I did make a point. You're inconsistent about your devotion to the law. First, you praise the ruling as a just exercise of due process, then defend the rioters.

 

[pknopp]

I did make a point. You're inconsistent about your devotion to the law. First, you praise the ruling as a just exercise of due process, then defend the rioters.

Pull the posts like you said. Otherwise I just laugh at you.

 

[candycorn]

Why?

it was done through the courts and agree or disagree it is the way it is.

Wait…I thought the Speaker of the House had to request the national guard. At least that is what we were told about 1/6.

It turns out the president can deploy the NG.

I guess they were lying to us about that. Imagine my shock

 

[pknopp]

Wait…I thought the Speaker of the House had to request the national guard. At least that is what we were told about 1/6.

It turns out the president can deploy the NG.

I guess they were lying to us about that. Imagine my shock

I never argued that. Take it up with those who did.

 

[Fang]

Newsom has lost control. Pretty sad that Trump has to come in and do Newsom’s job now.

 

[Oddball]

Wouldn't you think the Ca. governor would be glad to see the Marines and end the looting and anarchy? What the hell is wrong with these people?

Rule over the ashes.