Judge decision to demand firing(s) a win/win for Trump - Get used to it

Status
Not open for further replies.

IDIOCRACY

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 2017
719
780
918
Remember back in the day Trump proved a winner as POTUS, over and over again? Sure you do, or you don't because you're dishonest.

So the judge ruled Fanni or her fanny's boyfriend have to go. Decision made, it's the boyfriend. A win win for Trump.

Fruits of the poisoned tree, just for starts. Heck, it's written everywhere, including the judge contributed to Fanni's campaign so she could get her fanny into office, now she faces the judge in court. What a beautiful thing.

They can make shit up under a weaponized justice system all day, drowning us with corruption. But in the end what's right still prevails. A great day(s) for our country, our founding fathers are proud.
 
1710533061441.png
 
Remember back in the day Trump proved a winner as POTUS, over and over again? Sure you do, or you don't because you're dishonest.

So the judge ruled Fanni or her fanny's boyfriend have to go. Decision made, it's the boyfriend. A win win for Trump.

Fruits of the poisoned tree, just for starts. Heck, it's written everywhere, including the judge contributed to Fanni's campaign so she could get her fanny into office, now she faces the judge in court. What a beautiful thing.

They can make shit up under a weaponized justice system all day, drowning us with corruption. But in the end what's right still prevails. A great day(s) for our country, our founding fathers are proud.
FAIL!
Fruit of the poisonous tree is a legal metaphor used to describe evidence that is obtained illegally.
Nobody has question the evidence. It was not what the conflict of interest thing was about and will not come into play.

The doctrine is subject to four main exceptions.[citation needed] The tainted evidence is admissible if:
  1. it was discovered in part as a result of an independent, untainted source; or
  2. it would inevitably have been discovered despite the tainted source; or
  3. the chain of causation between the illegal action and the tainted evidence is too attenuated; or
  4. the search warrant was not found to be valid based on probable cause, but was executed by government agents in good faith (called the good-faith exception).
 
Last edited:
It's so awesome, judge contributes to the DA's campaign, DA and prosecution lie. Drag it out, right up until Trump wins, game over. Only to face the left's next plan, being a different lie that lasts 2-4 years or more.

Wasn't anything to Trump and Georgia in the first place, though some of Trump's associates fucked up, dumb shits. Never is, but what's important is the picture the left chooses to paint next.
 
Last edited:
"Decision made, it's the boyfriend. A win win for Trump."
A "win-win"?
Unless, of course, the DA is now is free to hire a super-competent, highly-experienced, ultra-aggressive litigator with a very strong record of getting criminal convictions.

So there is that.
Willis may be able 'trade-up' in player talent.

Notably, Georgia pays litigators in this case very well, so there's a lotta talent out there that may want the money and the reputational booster-rocket he will get with a bunch of criminal convictions in this case. Willis likely has a drawer-full of resume's and applications already. It is, after all, a pretty big case. Could be a pretty big feather in some killer-attorney's career-hat.

And too, what has to be appealing is that he/she will have a bit of a head-start with all the guilty pleas already on the fish-stringer.

Just sayin'.

----------------------------------------------------

She flat out lied to the court.
Link?
Link from the court?
Not Alex Jones or Steve Bannon or Gateway Pundit.
 
I want to see Fani punished. :)
Looks like you won't get what you want.

Fulton County judge says district attorney Fani Willis can continue to prosecute the 2020 election interference case​



Nick Valencia Devan Cole

By Jason Morris, Nick Valencia and Devan Cole, CNN

5 minute read

Updated 3:58 PM EDT, Fri March 15, 2024
 
Both however cannot continue
Who cares? Judge says she can stay on the case. He will turn over all evidence and notes to a new prosecutor to handle the actual prosecution and trial.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top