This has gotten off-topic. The FBI did not tell Twitter to support global warming.They admitted that they did, but please tell us what The Party ordered you to say
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This has gotten off-topic. The FBI did not tell Twitter to support global warming.They admitted that they did, but please tell us what The Party ordered you to say
The coordinated effort between the Fascist Biden Administration and corporate America IS the topicThis has gotten off-topic. The FBI did not tell Twitter to support global warming.
He turned in all his property and money?JPMorgan CEO suggests government seize private property to quicken climate initiatives
In his annual letter to shareholders, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon suggested that the U.S. government and climate conscious corporations may have to seize citizen’s private property to enact climate initiatives while there still time to stave off climate disasters.
Dimon declared Tuesday that "governments, businesses and non-governmental organizations" may need to invoke "eminent domain" in order to get the "adequate investments fast enough for grid, solar, wind and pipeline initiatives."
"Eminent domain" is a legal term that describes the government using its power to expropriate private property for public use, provided the government provides private owners proper compensation.
In his letter, which touted the successes of the financial services company in 2022 as well as providing shareholders a vision for its future, Dimon made the case that it might be time to justify eminent domain in America to ease the climate crisis. According to the CEO, such drastic measures may be employed because time is short.
"The window for action to avert the costliest impacts of global climate change is closing," he said, along with mentioning his concern that the "ongoing war in Ukraine is roiling trade relations across Europe and Asia and redefining the way countries and companies plan for energy security."
"The need to provide energy affordably and reliably for today, as well as make the necessary investments to decarbonize for tomorrow, underscores the inextricable links between economic growth, energy security and climate change. We need to do more, and we need to do so immediately," Dimon added.
We could start with his 34 acre 16 million dollar property he just acquired.
This has gotten off-topic. The FBI did not tell Twitter to support global warming.
The topic of this thread is statements by the GS CEO Jamie Dimon. He is neither an agent nor representative of the government. He is expressing his personal opinion as to what he thinks the government should. I have seen no quotations here from anyone in government suggesting they are considering the use of eminent domain to fight global warming.That is a misleading answer. The "FBI" didn't, but the Biden Administration did...
You really didn’t write that lie!They have not and you have no evidence suggesting they did.
Yes they did!This has gotten off-topic. The FBI did not tell Twitter to support global warming.
Then you can provide a link, right?You really didn’t write that lie!
The paperwork and whistle blowers proved it happened.
Then you can provide a link, right?
Yes they did!
I agree. Let's begin by seizing all of Mr. Dimon's private property, his homes, his jets, his cars, his jewelry, his furniture, everything.
what would that accomplish?it would be easier getting us common citizens to stop burning so much ...
what would that accomplish?
That depends on what you mean by "a long ways".Civilization is a long ways away from alternative energy
If you think that they should, then you believe there are motivations beyond simple profit. I agree. We need to go that way to reduce and eventually eliminate our GHG emissions. If that requires government mandates and subsidies to accomplish, then so be it..Should they be striving to do so, yes, however what value is it if on its own face value they wouldn’t succeed without government subsidies speaks volumes as to its economic viability. The current electrical grid is maxed and to proclaim net zero is economically feasible is pure nonsense and unrealistic. The market on its own will decide the future of green energy, not government mandate or social shaming.
What makes you say that?The only actual question is how this would benefit Dimon/Chase.
This is not about climate change.
What makes you say that?
This thread concerns something he said, not something he did.There is nothing Chase nor Dimon does that doesn't profit Chase and the shareholders in some way.
It is literally his job.