Jonathan Turley: "You can't build a case based on Trump's Jan. 6 speech"

[MAGA Macho Man]

Trump never called for violence in his January 6 speech. What Smith is engaging in is election interference. This is going to backfire on Smith.

Turley exposes the big question in potential third Trump indictment — and how it may ultimately backfire to help Trump | Blaze Media

Legal expert Jonathan Turley predicted Tuesday that another indictment against former President Donald Trump may backfire unless investigators possess air-tight evidence of a crime.What is the background?On Tuesday, Trump revealed that he received a "target letter" from special counsel Jack...

www.theblaze.com

 

[john doe 101]

Trump never called for violence in his January 6 speech. What Smith is engaging in is election interference. This is going to backfire on Smith.

Turley exposes the big question in potential third Trump indictment — and how it may ultimately backfire to help Trump | Blaze Media

Legal expert Jonathan Turley predicted Tuesday that another indictment against former President Donald Trump may backfire unless investigators possess air-tight evidence of a crime.What is the background?On Tuesday, Trump revealed that he received a "target letter" from special counsel Jack...

www.theblaze.com

They arent going to use the speech as the main evidence, dimwit. They'll probably focus on the "perfect phone calls" to election officials and could very well use RICO statutes in the attempt to use fake electors to circumvent the will of the people.

You're an idiot if you think they dont have trump nailed.

 

[MarathonMike]

Trump never called for violence in his January 6 speech. What Smith is engaging in is election interference. This is going to backfire on Smith.

Turley exposes the big question in potential third Trump indictment — and how it may ultimately backfire to help Trump | Blaze Media

Legal expert Jonathan Turley predicted Tuesday that another indictment against former President Donald Trump may backfire unless investigators possess air-tight evidence of a crime.What is the background?On Tuesday, Trump revealed that he received a "target letter" from special counsel Jack...

www.theblaze.com

You can do whatever you want when you control the DOJ. That is the fundamental problem when separation of powers collapses.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

You can do whatever you want when you control the DOJ. That is the fundamental problem when separation of powers collapses.

That's exactly what is happening.

 

[cnm]

Trump never called for violence in his January 6 speech.

Yeah, right.

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.​

Read Trump's Jan. 6 Speech, A Key Part Of Impeachment Trial

The former president's remarks are being used by Democrats hoping to convict him for incitement of insurrection — and are being defended by his lawyers in the Senate proceedings.

www.npr.org

​

 

[cnm]

You can do whatever you want when you control the DOJ. That is the fundamental problem when separation of powers collapses.

Lol. As though the LOTUS wasn't trying to separate out all powers for himself.

 

[Skylar]

Trump never called for violence in his January 6 speech. What Smith is engaging in is election interference. This is going to backfire on Smith.

Turley exposes the big question in potential third Trump indictment — and how it may ultimately backfire to help Trump | Blaze Media

Legal expert Jonathan Turley predicted Tuesday that another indictment against former President Donald Trump may backfire unless investigators possess air-tight evidence of a crime.What is the background?On Tuesday, Trump revealed that he received a "target letter" from special counsel Jack...

www.theblaze.com

What Smith is engaged in is called due process.

And you can't critique an indictment that hasn't come down yet.....as you don't know what the charges or the evidence is.

 

[SweetSue92]

Trump never called for violence in his January 6 speech. What Smith is engaging in is election interference. This is going to backfire on Smith.

Turley exposes the big question in potential third Trump indictment — and how it may ultimately backfire to help Trump | Blaze Media

Legal expert Jonathan Turley predicted Tuesday that another indictment against former President Donald Trump may backfire unless investigators possess air-tight evidence of a crime.What is the background?On Tuesday, Trump revealed that he received a "target letter" from special counsel Jack...

www.theblaze.com

No one seems to care anymore--this is already off trends on Twitter. TWITTER, the leftists haven.

It's the Boy Who Cried Wolf and Turley is right, it's helping Trump. He's also right that Schiff and co could find nothing. For every one of these indictments, every time there is not CLEAR evidence, the Left looks worse and worse.

They can't see it of course. Their TDS is blinded them.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Yeah, right.

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.​

Read Trump's Jan. 6 Speech, A Key Part Of Impeachment Trial

The former president's remarks are being used by Democrats hoping to convict him for incitement of insurrection — and are being defended by his lawyers in the Senate proceedings.

www.npr.org

​

He said to march peacefully.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, he's correct. They SHOWED UP ready to "fight" because of his non-stop apocalyptic rhetoric IN THE YEAR LEADING UP TO THAT DAY, and all the enabling provided to him by his obedient media, his crazed inner circle and his craven politicians.

Obviously.

 

[SweetSue92]

Well, he's correct. They SHOWED UP ready to "fight" because of his non-stop apocalyptic rhetoric IN THE YEAR LEADING UP TO THAT DAY.

Obviously.

Hey Mac. Are you all in favor of arresting people for "rhetoric"?

Take your stand, tough guy

 

[Mac1958]

Hey Mac. Are you all in favor of arresting people for "rhetoric"?

Take your stand, tough guy

If it's seditious, yes. As our Founding Fathers laid out. As if you care.

Thanks for asking!

 

[SweetSue92]

If it's seditious, yes. As our Founding Fathers laid out. As if you care.

Thanks for asking!

 

[SweetSue92]

If it's seditious, yes. As our Founding Fathers laid out. As if you care.

Thanks for asking!

 

[Esdraelon]

They arent going to use the speech as the main evidence, dimwit. They'll probably focus on the "perfect phone calls" to election officials and could very well use RICO statutes in the attempt to use fake electors to circumvent the will of the people.

You're an idiot if you think they dont have trump nailed.

Just like all those other times they "had him", right? Idiots...

 

[cnm]

He said to march peacefully.

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore,"

 

[Nostra]

Yeah, right.

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.​

Read Trump's Jan. 6 Speech, A Key Part Of Impeachment Trial

The former president's remarks are being used by Democrats hoping to convict him for incitement of insurrection — and are being defended by his lawyers in the Senate proceedings.

www.npr.org

​

Pretty sure Turley knows more about the law than you do, Simp.

 

[Lakhota]

Why did Trump wait 187 minutes before asking the violent insurrectionists to leave?

 

[Nostra]

Why did Trump wait 187 minutes before asking the violent insurrectionists to leave?

What statute does that violate?

Be specific, and bring links.

 

[d0gbreath]

What statute does that violate?

Be specific, and bring links.

We don't have to dig into that stuff. All we have to do is wait, watch, and listen.