Jonathan Turley Warns Biden Could Be the Next Anthony Weiner

[konradv]

Came out of committee with a recommendation for an inquiry.............floor vote not required.

According to the rules adopted after Trump’s first impeachment, it is.

 

[Delldude]

He’s got files he can prove were doctored. He’s only going after the guy that did the doctoring…, for now. Wonder where that’ll lead?

How can he have files that were doctored being he lost possession of the laptop?
Dude, you're shooting blanks.

 

[Delldude]

According to the rules adopted after Trump’s first impeachment, it is.

Nope

It’s perfectly legal and constitutional for McCarthy to start an inquiry without a vote. But it’s a significant reversal for the GOP Speaker, who just 11 days ago said he would not open an official probe without a floor vote.
___________________
“The precedent allows the Speaker to call up an impeachment inquiry. Speaker McCarthy’s announcement this morning constitutes the formal opening of an impeachment inquiry but importantly does not preclude a vote from occurring in the future,” a senior House aide said.

“This phase of an impeachment inquiry provides an opportunity for the House to formally outline the scope of its investigation, provides notice to the accused and time for further conversations with members,” the aide said.

Why McCarthy launched an impeachment inquiry without a vote — and why he can

 

[g5000]

This is why they have started a formal impeachment inquiry.......to gather the other evidence Mr Transparency, Resident Biden, refuses to release.

Like his bank records and emailing, for openers.

Now THIS is what a witch hunt looks like!

All you dipshits have fallen for yet another hoax. Smears, innuendos, lies. Anything to distract from Trump's actual crimes.

 

[Delldude]

Now THIS is what a witch hunt looks like!

All you dipshits have fallen for yet another hoax. Smears, innuendos, lies. Anything to distract from Trump's actual crimes.

Kinda funny................now it's Schumer who's screaming witch hunt..........................

 

[kyzr]

He can’t open an inquiry without a vote per the rules change after Trump’s first impeachment, when Republicans complained that Pelosi overstepped her bounds by not having a vote. The rule was set by the Trump Office of Legal Counsel and was followed for the second Trump impeachment. Expect this to go to court, if McCarthy doesn’t back down.

I gave you the link, its officially open. We'll see if anyone challenges it, to your point.

 

[g5000]

Kinda funny................now it's Schumer who's screaming witch hunt..........................

Yes, because this is what a real one looks like.

Despite all his best efforts, Comer has come up with fuck-all in the way of a shred of evidence against Biden.

This witch hunt is an obvious appeasement by "My Kevin" of the full tard wing of the organization formerly known as the Republican Party. The worst pussy to ever hold the position of Speaker.

This is a blatant attempt to distract from Trump's REAL crimes, and no one is fooled by it.

The GOP is quadrupling down on it's death spiral.

 

[BlindBoo]

Get Ready. Get set. Now smear!

That's all Turley's good for.

 

[Delldude]

Despite all his best efforts, Comer has come up with fuck-all in the way of a shred of evidence against Biden.

And you know this how?

The GOP is quadrupling down on it's death spiral.

You think they'll borrow your parties wrecking ball, Resident Biden?

 

[g5000]

And you know this how?

Because there isn't, dumbass. Comer has come up with nothing.

You know why McCarthy didn't hold a House vote to initiate the process as he promised he would?

Because even a significant number of Republicans have made it clear this is a witch hunt and would not play along.

You know things are bad when even Trump lickspittles begin to break from the cult.

See the Charles MacKay quote in my signature.

 

[konradv]

I gave you the link, its officially open. We'll see if anyone challenges it, to your point.

According to the ruling after the first Trump impeachment, any sub poenas issued without a full House vote approving the inquiry, may be ignored.

 

[konradv]

Nope

It’s perfectly legal and constitutional for McCarthy to start an inquiry without a vote. But it’s a significant reversal for the GOP Speaker, who just 11 days ago said he would not open an official probe without a floor vote.
___________________
“The precedent allows the Speaker to call up an impeachment inquiry. Speaker McCarthy’s announcement this morning constitutes the formal opening of an impeachment inquiry but importantly does not preclude a vote from occurring in the future,” a senior House aide said.

“This phase of an impeachment inquiry provides an opportunity for the House to formally outline the scope of its investigation, provides notice to the accused and time for further conversations with members,” the aide said.

Why McCarthy launched an impeachment inquiry without a vote — and why he can

That was changed after Pelosi did it.

 

[kaz]

Sounds like a desperate attempt to deflect attention away from Trump’s indictments.

What happens when one day Xiden gets past his pants checker?

 

[kaz]

On a witch hunt, are you?

LOL, the "conservative" who "only hates Trump" arguing against any accountability for Sleepy Joe.

On the other hand, killer avatar, it rocks!

 

[kyzr]

Yes, because this is what a real one looks like. Despite all his best efforts, Comer has come up with fuck-all in the way of a shred of evidence against Biden.
This witch hunt is an obvious appeasement by "My Kevin" of the full tard wing of the organization formerly known as the Republican Party. The worst pussy to ever hold the position of Speaker. This is a blatant attempt to distract from Trump's REAL crimes, and no one is fooled by it.
The GOP is quadrupling down on it's death spiral.

1. Comer has Articles of Impeachment coming out of his ears.

2. The new ones I like are "abuse of power" for forgiving $39b of student loan debt, to open borders in violation of US immigration law, to abandoning $85b of military equipment in AFG

3. No one is distracting from Trump's malicious prosecutions, those bullshit cases are moving forward.

4. Maybe you didn't get the memo yet? The dems are about to throw "Too Old Joe" under the bus. They finally see the writing on the wall that he is unelectable, as is Kamala. The "distractions" are about to hit "Warp Speed".

 

[kyzr]

According to the ruling after the first Trump impeachment, any sub poenas issued without a full House vote approving the inquiry, may be ignored.

That may still be true. Kevin opened the Inquiry. Next step is to write subpoenas, then they get voted on by the full House.

News flash: Hunter Biden just indicted on 3-counts. Looks to be gun related.

 

[Delldude]

That was changed after Pelosi did it.

Doesn't look like it. The same arguments are being applied now as they were then. Beyond that, how are you so sure house rules haven't been changed?

 

[nomadic5]

Sounds like a desperate attempt to deflect attention away from Trump’s indictments.

the irony!

No, the indictments are a deflection away from bidum corruption. It is far from working though.. Trump got bumps in his support every time he was indicted

LMAO

 

[nomadic5]

IRONY!

show us where Trump sold out his country?

I recall Trump going w/o a salary

Bet you forgot that... or didn't ever know it because Clinton News Network aka cnn never had that story

 

[konradv]

Doesn't look like it. The same arguments are being applied now as they were then. Beyond that, how are you so sure house rules haven't been changed?

Sorry,, seems they were only changed for actions against Trump. MAGA justice! Of course, a lot of the same people who complained about Pelosi are now telling us McCarthy has the right, despite the rules put forward by the Trump Office of Legal Counsel and used in the second impeachment. Hypocrisy anyone?