Jon Stewart Owns Fox News and Racists everywhere.

[Rotagilla]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

Because he quoted Jon Stewart?

If the O/P had quoted Rush Limbaugh would you conclude that he got his news from talk radio?

Or would you affirm?

If "if" was a skiff we could go fishing.
If "if" was a fifth we could have a drink, too.

LMAO.."IF"

If you had an intelligent response you would have made it.
Stick to nursery rhymes, it suits you.

LMAO..you make up something stupid and get called on it and then double down on stupid.
No one is fooled.

 

[Statistikhengst]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

as opposed to how many right-wingers voted for a former actor?

You know you've lost the point when you seriously try comparing Jon Stewart to Ronald Reagan.

Jon Stewart is far brighter than Reagan ever was. Reagan was propped up and controlled by Donald Regan, the ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch, and thus the downward spiral began.

Ah...there are 14 writers for the Jon Stewart show. You mistake the collective "brightness" of all those people for the brightness of the star of a television show. I'm not saying that Stewart is an idiot...but you need to understand that he's NOT as funny nor as intelligent as you seem to think.

Think of it along the lines with how bright Barry is when he's not reading off a teleprompter and you get the gist of what I'm saying.

RWNJs say:

Reality looks different than they think:

(Eisenhower)


and:

(Kennedy)

and:

(Johnson)

and:

and:

(Nixon)


and:

(Ford - and Reagan)

(Carter)

and:

(Reagan)

and:

and:

and:

and:

(Bush 41)

and:

(Clinton)

and:

and:

(Bush 43)

(McCain)

and:

(Palin)

and:

and:

(Romney)

and:

and:

and:

(Paul Ryan)

and:

Yepp. All those pols with teleprompters.

But whacked out Righties only see this:

Poor whacked-out Righties. So out of touch with reality. Really.

 

[jillian]

lol... jeeze they're funny

 

[Rotagilla]

Yepp. All those pols with teleprompters.


Poor whacked-out Righties. So out of touch with reality. Really.

LMAO..you invent a strawman out of thin air so you can blame "righties" (how cute!) and then knock it down yourself...how clever!

 

[mudwhistle]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

Because he quoted Jon Stewart?

If the O/P had quoted Rush Limbaugh would you conclude that he got his news from talk radio?

Or would you affirm?

The right rarely quotes Rush. It's always you guys quoting him. We usually quote Obama, because he's always putting his foot in his mouth and then for weeks you all are trying to redefine the meaning.

 

[mudwhistle]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

as opposed to how many right-wingers voted for a former actor?

You know what's sad, Jillian? How that former actor was so much more of a leader than our current President.

Yes...he led our Marines into Beirut and led the survivors out. He led us into an illegal amnesty....he led us into propping up what later became AQ to help death squads in Latin America.

He was quite the leader....when he remembered to lead.

I just enjoyed his continual reference to his will when he said Well over and over..and his speech writers that plagiarized Washington's inaugural address...

Well, I'd rather our president sound like Washington than sound like our enemies.

 

[Oldstyle]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

as opposed to how many right-wingers voted for a former actor?

You know you've lost the point when you seriously try comparing Jon Stewart to Ronald Reagan.

Jon Stewart is far brighter than Reagan ever was. Reagan was propped up and controlled by Donald Regan, the ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch, and thus the downward spiral began.

Ah...there are 14 writers for the Jon Stewart show. You mistake the collective "brightness" of all those people for the brightness of the star of a television show. I'm not saying that Stewart is an idiot...but you need to understand that he's NOT as funny nor as intelligent as you seem to think.

Think of it along the lines with how bright Barry is when he's not reading off a teleprompter and you get the gist of what I'm saying.

RWNJs say:

Reality looks different than they think:

(Eisenhower)


and:

(Kennedy)

and:

(Johnson)

and:

and:

(Nixon)


and:

(Ford - and Reagan)

(Carter)

and:

(Reagan)

and:

and:

and:

and:

(Bush 41)

and:

(Clinton)

and:

and:

(Bush 43)

(McCain)

and:

(Palin)

and:

and:

(Romney)

and:

and:

and:

(Paul Ryan)

and:

Yepp. All those pols with teleprompters.

But whacked out Righties only see this:

Poor whacked-out Righties. So out of touch with reality. Really.

I never said that other Presidents didn't use teleprompters, Stats...my point was that Presidents reading the words of someone else off of a teleprompter make themselves appear more intelligent than they really are...just as Jon Stewart reading the lines given to him by the 14 staff writers from the Daily Show is going to appear funnier and more intelligent than he really is.

But thanks for all the photos...

 

[Oldstyle]

And with all due respect...you could take away the teleprompter from Paul Ryan and he wouldn't miss a beat talking about complex economic issues. He's one of the smarter people on the Hill when it comes to that. Take away Barry's teleprompter and ask him to address complex economic issues and you're probably not going to like what you get.

 

[mudwhistle]

And with all due respect...you could take away the teleprompter from Paul Ryan and he wouldn't miss a beat talking about complex economic issues. He's one of the smarter people on the Hill when it comes to that. Take away Barry's teleprompter and ask him to address complex economic issues and you're probably not going to like what you get.

You'll either not get the answer you expect, get confused, or go into a coma listening to him.

 

[Oldstyle]

That was a "don't pay any attention to the man behind the curtain!" moment if there ever was one.

 

[Statistikhengst]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

as opposed to how many right-wingers voted for a former actor?

You know you've lost the point when you seriously try comparing Jon Stewart to Ronald Reagan.

Jon Stewart is far brighter than Reagan ever was. Reagan was propped up and controlled by Donald Regan, the ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch, and thus the downward spiral began.

Ah...there are 14 writers for the Jon Stewart show. You mistake the collective "brightness" of all those people for the brightness of the star of a television show. I'm not saying that Stewart is an idiot...but you need to understand that he's NOT as funny nor as intelligent as you seem to think.

Think of it along the lines with how bright Barry is when he's not reading off a teleprompter and you get the gist of what I'm saying.

RWNJs say:

Reality looks different than they think:

(Eisenhower)


and:

(Kennedy)

and:

(Johnson)

and:

and:

(Nixon)


and:

(Ford - and Reagan)

(Carter)

and:

(Reagan)

and:

and:

and:

and:

(Bush 41)

and:

(Clinton)

and:

and:

(Bush 43)

(McCain)

and:

(Palin)

and:

and:

(Romney)

and:

and:

and:

(Paul Ryan)

and:

Yepp. All those pols with teleprompters.

But whacked out Righties only see this:

Poor whacked-out Righties. So out of touch with reality. Really.

I never said that other Presidents didn't use teleprompters, Stats...my point was that Presidents reading the words of someone else off of a teleprompter make themselves appear more intelligent than they really are...just as Jon Stewart reading the lines given to him by the 14 staff writers from the Daily Show is going to appear funnier and more intelligent than he really is.

But thanks for all the photos...

Strong disagreement from me. A president reading from a teleprompter in the age of Television is no different than presidents who used to read from their own typed notes. It makes them neither more intelligent nor less intelligent than they are, imo, but it does help them to organize their thoughts.

 

[Oldstyle]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

as opposed to how many right-wingers voted for a former actor?

You know you've lost the point when you seriously try comparing Jon Stewart to Ronald Reagan.

Jon Stewart is far brighter than Reagan ever was. Reagan was propped up and controlled by Donald Regan, the ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch, and thus the downward spiral began.

Ah...there are 14 writers for the Jon Stewart show. You mistake the collective "brightness" of all those people for the brightness of the star of a television show. I'm not saying that Stewart is an idiot...but you need to understand that he's NOT as funny nor as intelligent as you seem to think.

Think of it along the lines with how bright Barry is when he's not reading off a teleprompter and you get the gist of what I'm saying.

RWNJs say:

Reality looks different than they think:

(Eisenhower)


and:

(Kennedy)

and:

(Johnson)

and:

and:

(Nixon)


and:

(Ford - and Reagan)

(Carter)

and:

(Reagan)

and:

and:

and:

and:

(Bush 41)

and:

(Clinton)

and:

and:

(Bush 43)

(McCain)

and:

(Palin)

and:

and:

(Romney)

and:

and:

and:

(Paul Ryan)

and:

Yepp. All those pols with teleprompters.

But whacked out Righties only see this:

Poor whacked-out Righties. So out of touch with reality. Really.

I never said that other Presidents didn't use teleprompters, Stats...my point was that Presidents reading the words of someone else off of a teleprompter make themselves appear more intelligent than they really are...just as Jon Stewart reading the lines given to him by the 14 staff writers from the Daily Show is going to appear funnier and more intelligent than he really is.

But thanks for all the photos...

Strong disagreement from me. A president reading from a teleprompter in the age of Television is no different than presidents who used to read from their own typed notes. It makes them neither more intelligent nor less intelligent than they are, imo, but it does help them to organize their thoughts.

I'm not quite sure what difference it makes if they are reading from a teleprompter or from typed notes, Stats...the point remains the same! Is someone REALLY that intelligent if they need to be constantly fed lines from someone else? Barack Obama actually seems to think that he's the smartest man in the room wherever he goes and yet when he's not reading from a script he doesn't come across as even remotely intelligent. That isn't "organizing your thoughts"...that's being a talking head!

My point was that if you put Barack Obama and Paul Ryan on a stage sans teleprompters and typed notes...and then had them take questions about complex economic issues, Ryan would excel and Obama would bomb. Quite frankly, I don't find Barack Obama to be very well versed in general economic fundamentals. It's obvious that is a subject that he never took in school and one that he has little interest in because it's confusing to him.

 

[Oldstyle]

What it comes down to is this...

Which would you rather have...someone who appears to be intelligent on a subject...or someone who actually IS intelligent on a subject?

 

[jillian]

And with all due respect...you could take away the teleprompter from Paul Ryan and he wouldn't miss a beat talking about complex economic issues. He's one of the smarter people on the Hill when it comes to that. Take away Barry's teleprompter and ask him to address complex economic issues and you're probably not going to like what you get.

funny... i'll pick the constitutional scholar over the randian idiot any day of the week.

just saying

 

[Stephanie]

this sums it up well. And DON'T ever allow the left to accuse you the right of being the REACTIONARYS...man Stewart has gone in the gutter, ugly and stupid.
links and a video at the site

SNIP:
Waiting for Facts Is Racism: Jon Stewart Joins the Ferguson Mob

by John Nolte 28 Aug 2014 711 post a comment
Jon Stewart has no idea what happened in Ferguson, MO, but pretends he does. And according to the Washington Post and much of the media, that's how Stewart ObliteratedDestroyedBlastedDemolishedShredded Fox News.
Let his trained seals in the media clap. The bottom line to Jon Stewart's rant is that he believes that waiting for facts is racism.
--
--
Somehow…
Stewart just knows Michael Brown put his hands up.
Stewart just knows racism was behind the shooting of Michael Brown.
Stewart just knows the shooting of Michael Brown was unjustified.
Stewart just knows that Al Sharpton's symbolic summits in Chicago are enough.
Stewart just knows that America's racial grifters and media are doing everything they can to stop the bloodshed in Chicago.
Stewart just knows that there's no more context behind all the facts and figures he cites except, of course, racism.

Even before the Justice Department, Stewart has already gotten to the bottom of what happened in Ferguson, and that gives him the right to step up on a pedestal, wag his widdle finger, and morally preen over those of us who believe in a little thing Americans like to call "waiting for the facts" or "due process" or "justice."

But because we don't have Stewart's magic crystal ball (and he's not sharing), all The Great Unwashed can do instead is wait for the facts, and in the meantime attempt to point out how dangerous, violent, and destructive things always get when those who don't wait for the facts (or share their crystal ball) scream racism based only on speculation.

Stewart isn't attacking Fox News for anything the network did wrong. He's attacking the network for waiting for the facts and wondering why those who aren't don't give a damn about the hundreds of black Americans murdered annually in Chicago.
That's wrong now.
That's racist now.
That's stupid now.
Up is down now.
Right is wrong now.
The police are corrupt; only the police should have guns.
The police are corrupt, but the government they serve is good.
Slavery is freedom.
George Zimmerman is white.
Join the mob or… Jon Stewart's going to look into the camera, tap his pencil, and make a funny face that ObliteratesDestroysBlastsDemolishesShreds you.

ALL of it here:
Waiting for Facts Is Racism Jon Stewart Joins the Ferguson Mob

 

[Statistikhengst]

You know what's telling? How many liberals get the bulk of their news from a comedian.

as opposed to how many right-wingers voted for a former actor?

You know you've lost the point when you seriously try comparing Jon Stewart to Ronald Reagan.

Jon Stewart is far brighter than Reagan ever was. Reagan was propped up and controlled by Donald Regan, the ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch, and thus the downward spiral began.

Ah...there are 14 writers for the Jon Stewart show. You mistake the collective "brightness" of all those people for the brightness of the star of a television show. I'm not saying that Stewart is an idiot...but you need to understand that he's NOT as funny nor as intelligent as you seem to think.

Think of it along the lines with how bright Barry is when he's not reading off a teleprompter and you get the gist of what I'm saying.

RWNJs say:

Reality looks different than they think:

(Eisenhower)


and:

(Kennedy)

and:

(Johnson)

and:

and:

(Nixon)


and:

(Ford - and Reagan)

(Carter)

and:

(Reagan)

and:

and:

and:

and:

(Bush 41)

and:

(Clinton)

and:

and:

(Bush 43)

(McCain)

and:

(Palin)

and:

and:

(Romney)

and:

and:

and:

(Paul Ryan)

and:

Yepp. All those pols with teleprompters.

But whacked out Righties only see this:

Poor whacked-out Righties. So out of touch with reality. Really.

I never said that other Presidents didn't use teleprompters, Stats...my point was that Presidents reading the words of someone else off of a teleprompter make themselves appear more intelligent than they really are...just as Jon Stewart reading the lines given to him by the 14 staff writers from the Daily Show is going to appear funnier and more intelligent than he really is.

But thanks for all the photos...

Strong disagreement from me. A president reading from a teleprompter in the age of Television is no different than presidents who used to read from their own typed notes. It makes them neither more intelligent nor less intelligent than they are, imo, but it does help them to organize their thoughts.

I'm not quite sure what difference it makes if they are reading from a teleprompter or from typed notes, Stats...the point remains the same! Is someone REALLY that intelligent if they need to be constantly fed lines from someone else? Barack Obama actually seems to think that he's the smartest man in the room wherever he goes and yet when he's not reading from a script he doesn't come across as even remotely intelligent. That isn't "organizing your thoughts"...that's being a talking head!

My point was that if you put Barack Obama and Paul Ryan on a stage sans teleprompters and typed notes...and then had them take questions about complex economic issues, Ryan would excel and Obama would bomb. Quite frankly, I don't find Barack Obama to be very well versed in general economic fundamentals. It's obvious that is a subject that he never took in school and one that he has little interest in because it's confusing to him.

That is only your opinion, which you are welcome to.

 

[Oldstyle]

And with all due respect...you could take away the teleprompter from Paul Ryan and he wouldn't miss a beat talking about complex economic issues. He's one of the smarter people on the Hill when it comes to that. Take away Barry's teleprompter and ask him to address complex economic issues and you're probably not going to like what you get.

funny... i'll pick the constitutional scholar over the randian idiot any day of the week.

just saying

Since the number one issue for Americans is the economy, being a "constitutional scholar" is about as valuable as tits on a bull. Just saying...

 

[Rotagilla]

And with all due respect...you could take away the teleprompter from Paul Ryan and he wouldn't miss a beat talking about complex economic issues. He's one of the smarter people on the Hill when it comes to that. Take away Barry's teleprompter and ask him to address complex economic issues and you're probably not going to like what you get.

funny... i'll pick the constitutional scholar over the randian idiot any day of the week.

just saying

Since the number one issue for Americans is the economy, being a "constitutional scholar" is about as valuable as tits on a bull. Just saying...

The "constitutional scholar" who thinks the constitution was written 2000 years ago.

 

[Stephanie]

I got a chuckle from one the comments on this article.

Simpletons are easily amused.

Stewart knows what his audience/viewers want and how they will butter his bread all the way to the bank

 

[Oldstyle]

What's ironic is the first American President who supposedly IS a constitutional scholar goes out of his way to ignore that Constitution as often as he can.