Joe Biden wants to apply ethics codes to the SC that ethic codes would throw him out of office

And, as has been the case in the past, future presidents will always use current changes in power in worse ways then now. The PA is such a good example of this.

Yep, each president will push it further and further and sadly it's defended by those who used to pretend they were against an authoritarian government.
 
again, yet it's Xiden and the Deamfacst censoring press, and attacking the Court...not Trump.

You are the one projecting here
As usual, you're FOS........AGAIN.

Lawsuits, jail threats and 'enemy of the people'​

1722325615123.webp
The Independent
https://www.the-independent.com › ... › US politics
Jan 22, 2023 — The former president once relied on press coverage to spin his narrative of self-made success. Now he threatens to imprison journalists and ...




Trump Accuses Media Of 'Treason' In Escalation Of Social ...​

1722325487925.webp
Forbes
https://www.forbes.com › Innovation › Consumer Tech
Sep 24, 2023 — Donald Trump said he would investigate media outlets like NBC News and MSNBC if he retakes the White House in 2024, according to a post on ...
 
As usual, you're FOS........AGAIN.

Lawsuits, jail threats and 'enemy of the people'

View attachment 986751
The Independent
https://www.the-independent.com › ... › US politics
Jan 22, 2023 — The former president once relied on press coverage to spin his narrative of self-made success. Now he threatens to imprison journalists and ...




Trump Accuses Media Of 'Treason' In Escalation Of Social ...

View attachment 986750
Forbes
https://www.forbes.com › Innovation › Consumer Tech
Sep 24, 2023 — Donald Trump said he would investigate media outlets like NBC News and MSNBC if he retakes the White House in 2024, according to a post on ...
Nothing wrong with investigating media outlets for violation of campaign fin laws

They aren’t above the law.

The issue of course is censorship, no president since Obama, has been more dangerous to the press the. Xiden
 
That proposed amendment, titled the “No One Is Above the Law Amendment,” responds to the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling earlier in July that declared former President Donald Trump immune from criminal prosecution for “official acts” he committed as president.
I would suggest retaining that bill name. No One Is Secure From Deep State Reach Amendment would be more accurate.
 
Nothing wrong with investigating media outlets for violation of campaign fin laws

They aren’t above the law.

The issue of course is censorship, no president since Obama, has been more dangerous to the press the. Xiden
Again................You're FOS.

Teabagger projection.
 
President Joe Biden on Monday unveiled a three-pronged proposal to reform the Supreme Court, a policy area that he said will be a focus of his remaining months in office.

Biden is calling for term limits on Supreme Court justices, a binding ethics code and a constitutional amendment declaring that presidents do not have immunity from criminal prosecution for any crimes committed while in office.

That proposed amendment, titled the “No One Is Above the Law Amendment,” responds to the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling earlier in July that declared former President Donald Trump immune from criminal prosecution for “official acts” he committed as president.


This makes Biden the first fascist :auiqs.jpg: leader in world history to propose a change to his country's laws giving up immunity from prosecution.
So Congress and Biden can be charged with Insider Trading?
 
First the only reason the left wants this is because the court make is six conservative justices and three liberal they would have no issue with the way the court is if it was the other way.Now one thing Biden wants is for Congress to pass term limits for justices I will support this if Congress puts in that same legislation term limits for themselves House and Senate no exceptions. We have term limits for the President they want them for Supreme Court justices no reason not to have them for Congress as well.
Congress is elected by the people....term limits come through our vote, for those critters

The Supreme court is not.

And you clearly have not been paying attention to the Thomas paid by billionaire scandal....etc.
 
Two congress critters under Trump were charged for insider trading, but the good ole man of Lawlessness pardoned them on his way out the door

Trump Pardons Corrupt Congressional Backers, Allies ...​

1722332568192.webp
Forbes
https://www.forbes.com › Business
Dec 22, 2020 — Former Reps. Duncan Hunter and Chris Collins, both convicted for financial crimes, were among Trump's first endorsements in 2016.
 
Congress is elected by the people....term limits come through our vote, for those critters

The Supreme court is not.

And you clearly have not been paying attention to the Thomas paid by billionaire scandal....etc.
The president is elected by the people as well but there are term limitis on them so there is no reason not to have term limits on Congress as well. I am aware of the bullshit claims against Thomas and give them all the consideration they deserve. I am also well aware that if as I said before if this was a 6-3 liberal majority court and the left was gettting rulings they liked no one on the left not Biden not Pelosi none of you would be purposing any of this it's election year horseshit and we all know it your fake news ratings won't change that.
 
The US constitution give Supreme Court justices a lifetime appointment. The president nor the congress can change that without a constitutional amendment.
OK

Let’s do it
 
The president is elected by the people as well but there are term limitis on them so there is no reason not to have term limits on Congress as well. I am aware of the bullshit claims against Thomas and give them all the consideration they deserve. I am also well aware that if as I said before if this was a 6-3 liberal majority court and the left was gettting rulings they liked no one on the left not Biden not Pelosi none of you would be purposing any of this it's election year horseshit and we all know it your fake news ratings won't change that.
Liberals would NOT EVER DO what these conservative justices have done. Liberal Justices respect Stare decisis, most conservative justices as well....until these power driven shitheads.

There has not been a Liberal Majority Supreme Court for over 50 to 60 years...nor a liberal picked supreme court Chief Justice.

You have NO IDEA what Liberal Justices would do.... Only your excuse driven, own imagination....you likely were not even born, when there was a Liberal picked, S.C.Justice majority black hawk.
 
Liberals would NOT EVER DO what these conservative justices have done. Liberal Justices respect Stare decisis, most conservative justices as well.

There has not been a Liberal Majority Supreme Court for over 50 to 60 years...nor a liberal picked supreme court Chief Justice.

You have NO IDEA what Liberal Justices would do.... Only your excuse driven, own imagination....you likely were not even born, when there was a Liberal picked, S.C.Justice majority black hawk.
True demklan judges used stare decisis to justify plessey v ferguson.

Thank goodness we have Conservative justices willing to follow the constitution and not simply prior rulings
 
Goes nowhere, just another election year ploy.
Biden isn't running, so that falls flat. It does give heed to the usual Democratic Party's efforts to make things right, as they see them. Draining the swamp was supposed to be a big cleanup to make things right. It was really just a slogan without a how-to book.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom