Joe Biden.....Mr Excitement

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
32,197
Reaction score
16,422
Points
1,915
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
biden hasn't gotten covid
SO WHAT, bitch? Leaders all over the world have picked it up including persons within Harris' party. Trump can't be sitting in his basement wearing a mask hiding 24/7 like Joe. If he did, then you'd claim he was unfit for or unable to carry out his duties. Either way, you try to create these puerile lose-lose situations for Trump like you think we are all idiots.

The real point is that very few people ever actually get seriously ill over it. ANY OTHER TIME, an illness like Trump and others have gotten probably wouldn't be enough for most people to justify calling off from work for or be excused from.

World pandemic my ass.
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
If you vote for either one you’re an idiot. I thought 2016 brought bad choices, this year is worse. I couldn’t vote for either, neither is worthy of the office.
There's Voting for. There's Voting against. There's Voting for baby steps in the right direction. There's Voting to change direction.
Yep, I’m voting for change, because after decades I realize the two parties are terrible in leading and are both corrupt. This election is an example of party over country.
Trump's not really a Republican.
Many Republicans that are on the take have voiced opposition to him.
So you could say that he's a 3rd party candidate.
what donny is - is a selfish sociopath, lenny. here - see, THIS is what yer chosen one does to his supporters:

Hundreds of Trump supporters stuck in the cold for hours when buses can’t reach Omaha rally

By
Tim Elfrink,
Brittany Shammas and
Brent D. Griffiths
October 28, 2020 at 6:34 PM EDT
By the time President Trump finished speaking to thousands of supporters at Omaha’s Eppley Airfield on Tuesday night and jetted away on Air Force One, the temperature had plunged to nearly freezing.
But as long lines of MAGA-clad attendees queued up for buses to take them to distant parking lots, it quickly became clear something was wrong.

The buses, the huge crowd soon learned, couldn’t navigate the jammed airport roads. For hours, attendees — including many elderly Trump supporters — stood in the cold as police scrambled to help those most at risk get to warmth, and some were taken to hospitals.
After spending about an hour walking the three-plus miles back to his car, Jonathon Sundet posted a tweet calling the situation “disheartening” and asking for an explanation from the Trump campaign. The 19-year-old South Dakota State University freshman and his girlfriend had driven four hours to attend the rally, only to be stranded.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/28/trump-omaha-supporters-stuck-cold/
Already a thread on this, Dear, it was the unfortunate result of circumstances that unfortunately, Joe Biden will never know because not enough people are interested in seeing him or hearing a word he has to say to bother coming out in the cold, parking or walking far enough that they need to set up tents with food and hot cocoa and buses to get people back and forth. If not for the Covid paranoia, they could have scheduled the rally indoors in a warm place with better roads that the buses could get around.
what pablum. people had to be treated medically & some walked miles back to their cars.

but you'll swallow anything.

anything.
No pablum. I already said it was an unfortunate situation. Whomever was in charger of setting up the affair is responsible. Why didn't they have the buses sitting right there at the event ready to take these people back? Why was the parking miles from the event?

They did apparently have tents and heaters and stuff, but because of all these Covid restrictions, it seems they were forced to do this outdoors and had limited places to do it large enough and the roads and facilities were inadequate. I would blame the organizers for poor planning as well as thanking the governor for forcing the circumstance.
blame trump's advancement team. besides, that part of the airport does not allow for parking - hence the fucking buses, & they should have known that & made sure their pickup was guaranteed.
Didn't I already agree with that? It shouldn't have happened. It was bad planning forced by the need to stage these events OUTDOORS.
donny hires only the best.
Donny can never do no right in your eyes. If he offed himself tonight, you'd bitch about the way he did it. At least he's out there letting the people actually SEE and MEET the person they are voting for.
... & giving them coronacooties.

gotta say though - if i had my druthers, donny would stroke out on his golden toilet with a big mac shoved down his gullet & that tribble on his head all askew with the official WH photographer snapping away & selling them to the enquirer.
He does not deserve the Honorary Death of Elvis. Long Rest the King, lol
Elvis was a Trump fan too?
 
OP
mudwhistle

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
97,148
Reaction score
24,775
Points
2,220
Location
Tested Negative For COVID-19
The pathetic little attempts at jogging are not significant for what they show physically. The significant thing is that he feels he has to do this sort of thing to satisfy his supporters that he is not so feeble that his very life is in question.
Trump has difficulty waddling 100 yards and struggles on ramps
Prove it.
 

iamwhatiseem

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
25,772
Reaction score
8,044
Points
900
Location
On a hill
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


Obmotcare.jpg



BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


super-obama.jpg


The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.

And another thing, before you crawl out of the gutter again... if Trump had done this. Oh my God!! You people would have been screaming your heads off!!! The media elites would have had their heads explode!! Pelosi would have probably died right on the spot.
But... it was glorious Obama. So... it's all good.
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


View attachment 408372


BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


View attachment 408374

The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.
2009 was not the only year it climbed, Sherlock - it climbed EVERY year...good try "it bottomed out so duhhh it grewww!!" Well yes, genius, but what do we credit with its recovery - - The President that oversaw the Stimulus, since we're comparing Presidents' economies.

If a Cultist is speaking, he is lying.

Home ownership declined because there was a Housing Bubble that crashed, you missed that one? You know, dumb dumb, that when the market crashed (literally an overnight), the folks weren't literally evicted right then and there, real time? You did know that right? Are you really that stupid? Do you know anything about the Foreclosure processes and how they can take YEARS to evict? - Cultists are indeed this fucking retarded.

Obama left Trump with a market that had years' straight growth, and at a higher % than Trumps EVEN excluding 2009. Shocking!

Obama left with mediocre but positive GDP growth, Trump took over and had mediocre GDP growth -

Obama left office with unemployment and job growth on an awesome trend. Trump took over and took credit for it.


When a Trump cultist is speaking, they are lying and being deceptive. Always - that's why even DATA doesn't work. In their bubble, it's Democrat = Satan, orange jesus = jesus, facts be damned.
 

iamwhatiseem

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
25,772
Reaction score
8,044
Points
900
Location
On a hill
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


View attachment 408372


BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


View attachment 408374

The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.
2009 was not the only year it climbed, Sherlock - it climbed EVERY year...good try "it bottomed out so duhhh it grewww!!" Well yes, genius, but what do we credit with its recovery - - The President that oversaw the Stimulus, since we're comparing Presidents' economies.

If a Cultist is speaking, he is lying.

Home ownership declined because there was a Housing Bubble that crashed, you missed that one? You know, dumb dumb, that when the market crashed (literally an overnight), the folks weren't literally evicted right then and there, real time? You did know that right? Are you really that stupid? Do you know anything about the Foreclosure processes and how they can take YEARS to evict? - Cultists are indeed this fucking retarded.

Obama left Trump with a market that had years' straight growth, and at a higher % than Trumps EVEN excluding 2009. Shocking!

Obama left with mediocre but positive GDP growth, Trump took over and had mediocre GDP growth -

Obama left office with unemployment and job growth on an awesome trend. Trump took over and took credit for it.


When a Trump cultist is speaking, they are lying and being deceptive. Always - that's why even DATA doesn't work. In their bubble, it's Democrat = Satan, orange jesus = jesus, facts be damned.
Yep - once again you are easy to predict.
Ignore what people say... go on a rant.... and... Orange Man Bad.
I said... 2 million people lost their homes due to the mortgage crises. Alone. Nearlly 10 million lost their homes in total. No time in American history have so many homes went empty. Ever. Ever.
BUT the mortgage companies not only didn't lose with the owner...nope. They were handed taxpayer money including profits. And then got to keep the home, and sell it for more profit.
Third time I said that.
Third time you ignored it and ranted about Orange man bad.
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
47,142
Reaction score
8,629
Points
2,070
Location
PNW
biden hasn't gotten covid.

but donny did & his 3rd trophy wife & his 5th spawn. donny is a super spreader.

biden says he'll follow the science & the experts who actually know wtf they are talking about & research infectious diseases as their life's work.

donny goes on his 'hunches' ... declares that the pandemic 'has ended' as the daily case number is rising so rapidly that we will hit 100K a day in the near future & the death toll is over 1/4 million.

that's all you need to know as to what biden is doing, how he's doing it & why.
These two people are the best the two party system has to offer. Our two party system is broken and in four years we will get worse candidates to choose from. I can’t in good conscience vote for either of these two. I found a good candidate but he isn’t a Democrat or a Republican. Too bad more people don’t explore the third parties, perhaps then it would force better candidates from the big two.
uh-huh - sorry but the stakes are way too high this time around. & i've voted 3rd party in the past. i voted for ralph nader in 2000 against W. & gore/liebertoady, who was my own state senator at the time .

& lookey what happened? W. got in because of a few hundred votes, & he broke the world. now donny wants it burned down. i have never voted along straight party lines b4 2018 & i'm voting for biden to get trump out & will vote straight (D) down ticket because the (R) party as a whole needs to be purged.
The stakes are high and idiots are voting for the two corrupt parties. To me that is really stupid.

I am not voting for an incumbent, the presidential race is third party. Anyone currently in my state in office, needs to go. I don't give a rip what party it is.
 

iamwhatiseem

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
25,772
Reaction score
8,044
Points
900
Location
On a hill
G.T.
Here is another one for you gutter boy.... you know who Larry Summers is?
I seriously fucking doubt it. So go ahead... Google him.
Obama wanted to make him Secy of the Treasury and used him in three different economic advisory roles, including chairman.
Larry fucking Summers.
Probably the most corrupt individual in Washington. And Obama wanted to make him Secy of Treasury.
And the only reason he didn't was his fellow Democrats threw a fit about it.
But, I don't expect you even know who he is.
And what about Robert Rubin? KNow who that is?? Of course you don't... not without Google.
What is his role in the mortgage crises?
No graphs to show that?
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


View attachment 408372


BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


View attachment 408374

The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.
2009 was not the only year it climbed, Sherlock - it climbed EVERY year...good try "it bottomed out so duhhh it grewww!!" Well yes, genius, but what do we credit with its recovery - - The President that oversaw the Stimulus, since we're comparing Presidents' economies.

If a Cultist is speaking, he is lying.

Home ownership declined because there was a Housing Bubble that crashed, you missed that one? You know, dumb dumb, that when the market crashed (literally an overnight), the folks weren't literally evicted right then and there, real time? You did know that right? Are you really that stupid? Do you know anything about the Foreclosure processes and how they can take YEARS to evict? - Cultists are indeed this fucking retarded.

Obama left Trump with a market that had years' straight growth, and at a higher % than Trumps EVEN excluding 2009. Shocking!

Obama left with mediocre but positive GDP growth, Trump took over and had mediocre GDP growth -

Obama left office with unemployment and job growth on an awesome trend. Trump took over and took credit for it.


When a Trump cultist is speaking, they are lying and being deceptive. Always - that's why even DATA doesn't work. In their bubble, it's Democrat = Satan, orange jesus = jesus, facts be damned.
Yep - once again you are easy to predict.
Ignore what people say... go on a rant.... and... Orange Man Bad.
I said... 2 million people lost their homes due to the mortgage crises. Alone. Nearlly 10 million lost their homes in total. No time in American history have so many homes went empty. Ever. Ever.
BUT the mortgage companies not only didn't lose with the owner...nope. They were handed taxpayer money including profits. And then got to keep the home, and sell it for more profit.
Third time I said that.
Third time you ignored it and ranted about Orange man bad.
The stimulus actually did come to citizens as well, Beavis...in the form of Tax cuts....In the form of rebuilt retirement accounts....IN THE FORM OF HELP FOR SMALL BUSINESSES... Just what in the exact fuck do you think was in the package? Did you know the bailouts happened before Obama took office, and the stimulus package after? Forgot that, eh? No problem. The bank bailout was 2008, inauguration day was 1/1/09....beuller beuller. Here's a link, dummy:

.


Seeking to prevent the collapse of the financial system, Secretary of the Treasury Paulson called for the U.S. government to purchase about several hundred billion dollars in distressed assets from financial institutions. Paulson's proposal was initially rejected by Congress, but the ongoing financial crisis and the lobbying of President Bush ultimately convinced Congress to enact Paulson's proposal as part of Public Law 110-343.

Early estimates for the total cost of the bailout to the government were as much as $700 billion, however TARP recovered funds totalling $441.7 billion from $426.4 billion invested, earning a $15.3 billion profit or an annualized rate of return of 0.6% and perhaps a loss when adjusted for inflation.
[3]





You are a straight moron, and I was glad to prove that here today, thank ya very much!
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
G.T.
Here is another one for you gutter boy.... you know who Larry Summers is?
I seriously fucking doubt it. So go ahead... Google him.
Obama wanted to make him Secy of the Treasury and used him in three different economic advisory roles, including chairman.
Larry fucking Summers.
Probably the most corrupt individual in Washington. And Obama wanted to make him Secy of Treasury.
And the only reason he didn't was his fellow Democrats threw a fit about it.
But, I don't expect you even know who he is.
And what about Robert Rubin? KNow who that is?? Of course you don't... not without Google.
What is his role in the mortgage crises?
No graphs to show that?
Gutter boy?

LOL

I happen to know for a fact from a lil birdy that my Economic situation is quite a bit more comfortable than yours is. Or was, when I knew :lol:

Pump the brakes on your economic conspiracy theory hole, dork - I've had enough of your boring ass....every response is fingers in your ears like a fuggin 4 year old moron. Time for better things to do.
 

iamwhatiseem

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
25,772
Reaction score
8,044
Points
900
Location
On a hill
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


View attachment 408372


BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


View attachment 408374

The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.
2009 was not the only year it climbed, Sherlock - it climbed EVERY year...good try "it bottomed out so duhhh it grewww!!" Well yes, genius, but what do we credit with its recovery - - The President that oversaw the Stimulus, since we're comparing Presidents' economies.

If a Cultist is speaking, he is lying.

Home ownership declined because there was a Housing Bubble that crashed, you missed that one? You know, dumb dumb, that when the market crashed (literally an overnight), the folks weren't literally evicted right then and there, real time? You did know that right? Are you really that stupid? Do you know anything about the Foreclosure processes and how they can take YEARS to evict? - Cultists are indeed this fucking retarded.

Obama left Trump with a market that had years' straight growth, and at a higher % than Trumps EVEN excluding 2009. Shocking!

Obama left with mediocre but positive GDP growth, Trump took over and had mediocre GDP growth -

Obama left office with unemployment and job growth on an awesome trend. Trump took over and took credit for it.


When a Trump cultist is speaking, they are lying and being deceptive. Always - that's why even DATA doesn't work. In their bubble, it's Democrat = Satan, orange jesus = jesus, facts be damned.
Yep - once again you are easy to predict.
Ignore what people say... go on a rant.... and... Orange Man Bad.
I said... 2 million people lost their homes due to the mortgage crises. Alone. Nearlly 10 million lost their homes in total. No time in American history have so many homes went empty. Ever. Ever.
BUT the mortgage companies not only didn't lose with the owner...nope. They were handed taxpayer money including profits. And then got to keep the home, and sell it for more profit.
Third time I said that.
Third time you ignored it and ranted about Orange man bad.
The stimulus actually did come to citizens as well, Beavis...in the form of Tax cuts....In the form of rebuilt retirement accounts....IN THE FORM OF HELP FOR SMALL BUSINESSES... Just what in the exact fuck do you think was in the package? Did you know the bailouts happened before Obama took office, and the stimulus package after? Forgot that, eh? No problem. The bank bailout was 2008, inauguration day was 1/1/09....beuller beuller. Here's a link, dummy:

.


Seeking to prevent the collapse of the financial system, Secretary of the Treasury Paulson called for the U.S. government to purchase about several hundred billion dollars in distressed assets from financial institutions. Paulson's proposal was initially rejected by Congress, but the ongoing financial crisis and the lobbying of President Bush ultimately convinced Congress to enact Paulson's proposal as part of Public Law 110-343.

Early estimates for the total cost of the bailout to the government were as much as $700 billion, however TARP recovered funds totalling $441.7 billion from $426.4 billion invested, earning a $15.3 billion profit or an annualized rate of return of 0.6% and perhaps a loss when adjusted for inflation.
[3]





You are a straight moron, and I was glad to prove that here today, thank ya very much!
Haha...and you ignored it again. And posted up bogus numbers that everyone knows is full of shit.
Mr Copy n Paste
And... oh... looky... you try and get personal again!
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


View attachment 408372


BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


View attachment 408374

The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.
2009 was not the only year it climbed, Sherlock - it climbed EVERY year...good try "it bottomed out so duhhh it grewww!!" Well yes, genius, but what do we credit with its recovery - - The President that oversaw the Stimulus, since we're comparing Presidents' economies.

If a Cultist is speaking, he is lying.

Home ownership declined because there was a Housing Bubble that crashed, you missed that one? You know, dumb dumb, that when the market crashed (literally an overnight), the folks weren't literally evicted right then and there, real time? You did know that right? Are you really that stupid? Do you know anything about the Foreclosure processes and how they can take YEARS to evict? - Cultists are indeed this fucking retarded.

Obama left Trump with a market that had years' straight growth, and at a higher % than Trumps EVEN excluding 2009. Shocking!

Obama left with mediocre but positive GDP growth, Trump took over and had mediocre GDP growth -

Obama left office with unemployment and job growth on an awesome trend. Trump took over and took credit for it.


When a Trump cultist is speaking, they are lying and being deceptive. Always - that's why even DATA doesn't work. In their bubble, it's Democrat = Satan, orange jesus = jesus, facts be damned.
Yep - once again you are easy to predict.
Ignore what people say... go on a rant.... and... Orange Man Bad.
I said... 2 million people lost their homes due to the mortgage crises. Alone. Nearlly 10 million lost their homes in total. No time in American history have so many homes went empty. Ever. Ever.
BUT the mortgage companies not only didn't lose with the owner...nope. They were handed taxpayer money including profits. And then got to keep the home, and sell it for more profit.
Third time I said that.
Third time you ignored it and ranted about Orange man bad.
The stimulus actually did come to citizens as well, Beavis...in the form of Tax cuts....In the form of rebuilt retirement accounts....IN THE FORM OF HELP FOR SMALL BUSINESSES... Just what in the exact fuck do you think was in the package? Did you know the bailouts happened before Obama took office, and the stimulus package after? Forgot that, eh? No problem. The bank bailout was 2008, inauguration day was 1/1/09....beuller beuller. Here's a link, dummy:

.


Seeking to prevent the collapse of the financial system, Secretary of the Treasury Paulson called for the U.S. government to purchase about several hundred billion dollars in distressed assets from financial institutions. Paulson's proposal was initially rejected by Congress, but the ongoing financial crisis and the lobbying of President Bush ultimately convinced Congress to enact Paulson's proposal as part of Public Law 110-343.

Early estimates for the total cost of the bailout to the government were as much as $700 billion, however TARP recovered funds totalling $441.7 billion from $426.4 billion invested, earning a $15.3 billion profit or an annualized rate of return of 0.6% and perhaps a loss when adjusted for inflation.
[3]





You are a straight moron, and I was glad to prove that here today, thank ya very much!
Haha...and you ignored it again. And posted up bogus numbers that everyone knows is full of shit.
Mr Copy n Paste
And... oh... looky... you try and get personal again!
They're bogus numbers because conspiracy! Yeah, your ego is a bit much for your intellect to overcome.
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
I don't want an exciting president. I want a competent president. That will be Joe Biden.
That's what my Wife says most of her Patients are saying. They don't care about this fucktard with his "Screw the libs!!" routine.

That blowhard rush limbaugh fox news dogmatic dogshit is old news. Even fox news is moving away from it.
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
More data, not fee-fees or Cult worship:

View attachment 408271
Biden is so depressing
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.
As opposed to voting for Biden... then you are... what?
A normal person.

Biden's 8 year track record in a leadership role has been a good one, economically for the Country. The O-Admin recovered the 401ks that got crushed under Bush and the crash, and everything went skyward from there and at a greater percentage-clip than under Trump...who took over, and to his credit, continued the trend.

Life on main-street doesn't barely change because of the President; however, under Trump people either fawn over him or hate him - - he spends 16 hours a day being divisive on twitter. All day, every waking moment. He's a scumbag, so all else being equal, Biden seems the better choice.

Back to boredom in Government, not the reality show.
That's some funny stuff right there.
Beyond sophomoric... downright pre-school level of knowledge.
You are one of the most unearned pompous & twatty dudes, I swear. You barely type coherent English. What you just posted was emotional dogshit, not a coherent response/rebuttal to what I had said about the economy.

Do you like colored charts, Trump Cultist? 2020, data/science matters because fuck your feelings.

View attachment 408258
Dubya gifted Obama an economy with lowest baseline in human history and he was able to explode the economy at almost 2% per annum!!!
If Obama was only having upward movement for 2 years...

three, even...maybe you'd be right.

Instead, it was all 8. He did his job, but your Cult somehow forgets your lil 401ks recovered thanks to that Administration and instead...act like he was the anti-Christ. Why do you think you behave that way? (rhetorical)
Haha... Mr. copy n paste is back.

Ok kid... [flip] here's a nickle. I'll give you another if you have any meaningful comment whatsoever... in fact as soon as you read it - you will go to Google and see what I am talking about.
Why was the Obama admin STILL providing $70 billion in taxpayer dollars - PER MONTH - all the way to 2014 to some of the wealthiest institutions in America...despite the fact, the entities they gave this money to were enjoying record profits?
I expect no answer from you. Because you won't even understand the most minimalist approach to the question, and how that question has a dramatic effect on all of these little graphs you like.
And that is only one question.

Good Luck.
That's not data, it's your nutbar rant regarding Federal stimulus that was working. Also, genius, the fed STILL props up the market under your orange dufus. Oops. Meanwhile, wages were up, unemployment was down, jobs were up, GDP was up, the stock market was up and taxes were the extended Bush tax cuts save for the folks who didn't have health insurance. Their health insurance acquisition was a tax per Justice Roberts.

You call me kid - I learn more in five minutes than you learn arguing like a pathetic sycophant for a clearly disturbed orange reality star every moment you're awake...and I'm happy with that. Cultists don't like information.
Exactly like I thought.
You have no idea about the specifics I was talking about.... but good luck with your copy n paste graphs and bogus articles.
At least you understand how Google works.
Right, Cultist. Data be damned, your twatty message board "analysis" is all anyone needs. :lol:

The tears on election night will be orange juice.
Data... dude you have provided no data.
You think a Googled graph is data?
I can link 1000 graphs that will say the complete opposite of what you say. Easy. Anyone can.
You Google a graph that shows Obama improved something, I can supply a graph from somewhere else that shows the opposite.
It is child's play. The internet is full of misinformation. And a graph is only as good as the data that made it... and you don't have the faintest clue as to the data behind the graphs you post. You see one that looks good, post it, and expect that means you know what you are talking about.
The Obama admin engaged in the single largest trickle down economics in American history.
You guys bitched to high heaven when Reagan spoke about it.... called it voodoo economics. But when your anointed one did it for real, you guys praise him for it. Over 2 million Americans lost their homes between 2008 - 2014. But the investment firms that owned the mortgages? They were bailed out WITH profits. And then sold the homes later for more profits. And you guys praise it!
That's a nice, data free rant. The usual.
Haha... you are entertaining, I'll give you that.

Okay kiddo... looky at this:

Graph 1 - Climate change is real and fucking scary as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!!!!

View attachment 408339

And Graph 2 - Climate change is a fucking joke ya buncha loons:

View attachment 408340


You get the picture?? I just "proved" and "disproved" climate change in 20 seconds!
You think this is legit?
A 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was the greatest economic genius in history.
The same 6 year old can find 150 graphs that show Obama was a corrupt pocket filler of the rich.

:rolleyes:
You're a moron, and elucidated your flaw. lol, bet you dunno how...here lemme show ya

You don't know how to decipher a graph =/= graphs are "wrong."

Don't worry, Cultist, most grown folks learn how not to be misled by a graph in the 6th grade. Maybe you skipped that one because you're such a whip! But unfortunately for your stupid as fuck theory here - it doesn't mean that the data on graphs is misleading or incorrect. It just means that you don't know how to properly vet the information therein.

My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph, challenge it with opposing data. Show that the numbers on the specific graphs are incorrect. You can do it!

For now, you're saying "nuh uhhh!!! I'm easily manipulated by graphs therefore graphs are wrong!!"

And, quite frankly, you sound more and more like a retarded curmudgeon by the minute.
Haha.... "My advice, is that next time if you want to challenge the data on a graph...."
And there you go again.
You don't know the data of the graphs you post, and neither does anyone else except the person who made it. You can't "disprove" data without the data. You understand that right? A graph is not data. It is a graphical representation of data.

Here you go.... disprove the data on the graph :lol:

View attachment 408345

See?... look everyone GT can't disprove the data on this graph!!
Clearly he is a cultist Obamabot!!
You posted a graph with no data, dumbfuck. :lol: cultists
Exactly what someone who can't disprove data would say.
Obama cultist!!
What an asswipe!!
Does your temper tantrum about data on graphs make you feel like you're winning something, because to me, it looks like a 4 year old putting his fingers in his ears.

Your responses have been "graphs arent real!"

followed by "heres a graph with no data!! told ya graphs aint real!!!"


Do you know how insanely derpy that is?

You didnt dispute the actual data, which the graphs I posted actually had, which were actually from reputable Economist sources...

Your rebuttal is "graphs aint realll brooo!"


:lol:
More of the same.

I told you 2 million people lost their homes from 2008 - 2014.
Obama's reaction those people...


View attachment 408372


BUT - the investment banks and investment firms that owned those mortgages... what about them?
Obama's reaction...


View attachment 408374

The people in the homes... lost it all... the investment banks were bailed out 100% INCLUDING proposed profits at time of foreclosure.
And then the investment firms sold the homes and kept that money too.
Obama gave a big FUCK YOU to the people who lost it all... but oh yeah... he was there for the wealthy investment firms.
You do realize that 2009 was one of the fastest climbing Wall Street year on record? Why? Go ahead... or are you going to ignore this to? And just call me some more names... and say Orange man Bad.
2009 was not the only year it climbed, Sherlock - it climbed EVERY year...good try "it bottomed out so duhhh it grewww!!" Well yes, genius, but what do we credit with its recovery - - The President that oversaw the Stimulus, since we're comparing Presidents' economies.

If a Cultist is speaking, he is lying.

Home ownership declined because there was a Housing Bubble that crashed, you missed that one? You know, dumb dumb, that when the market crashed (literally an overnight), the folks weren't literally evicted right then and there, real time? You did know that right? Are you really that stupid? Do you know anything about the Foreclosure processes and how they can take YEARS to evict? - Cultists are indeed this fucking retarded.

Obama left Trump with a market that had years' straight growth, and at a higher % than Trumps EVEN excluding 2009. Shocking!

Obama left with mediocre but positive GDP growth, Trump took over and had mediocre GDP growth -

Obama left office with unemployment and job growth on an awesome trend. Trump took over and took credit for it.


When a Trump cultist is speaking, they are lying and being deceptive. Always - that's why even DATA doesn't work. In their bubble, it's Democrat = Satan, orange jesus = jesus, facts be damned.
Yep - once again you are easy to predict.
Ignore what people say... go on a rant.... and... Orange Man Bad.
I said... 2 million people lost their homes due to the mortgage crises. Alone. Nearlly 10 million lost their homes in total. No time in American history have so many homes went empty. Ever. Ever.
BUT the mortgage companies not only didn't lose with the owner...nope. They were handed taxpayer money including profits. And then got to keep the home, and sell it for more profit.
Third time I said that.
Third time you ignored it and ranted about Orange man bad.
The stimulus actually did come to citizens as well, Beavis...in the form of Tax cuts....In the form of rebuilt retirement accounts....IN THE FORM OF HELP FOR SMALL BUSINESSES... Just what in the exact fuck do you think was in the package? Did you know the bailouts happened before Obama took office, and the stimulus package after? Forgot that, eh? No problem. The bank bailout was 2008, inauguration day was 1/1/09....beuller beuller. Here's a link, dummy:

.


Seeking to prevent the collapse of the financial system, Secretary of the Treasury Paulson called for the U.S. government to purchase about several hundred billion dollars in distressed assets from financial institutions. Paulson's proposal was initially rejected by Congress, but the ongoing financial crisis and the lobbying of President Bush ultimately convinced Congress to enact Paulson's proposal as part of Public Law 110-343.

Early estimates for the total cost of the bailout to the government were as much as $700 billion, however TARP recovered funds totalling $441.7 billion from $426.4 billion invested, earning a $15.3 billion profit or an annualized rate of return of 0.6% and perhaps a loss when adjusted for inflation.
[3]





You are a straight moron, and I was glad to prove that here today, thank ya very much!
Haha...and you ignored it again. And posted up bogus numbers that everyone knows is full of shit.
Mr Copy n Paste
And... oh... looky... you try and get personal again!
I....try and get personal?

Gutter boy was YOUR comment, cultist. Damn...you are literally almost ALWAYS wrong...how is that humanly possible. Bot?
 

iamwhatiseem

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
25,772
Reaction score
8,044
Points
900
Location
On a hill
G.T.
Here is another one for you gutter boy.... you know who Larry Summers is?
I seriously fucking doubt it. So go ahead... Google him.
Obama wanted to make him Secy of the Treasury and used him in three different economic advisory roles, including chairman.
Larry fucking Summers.
Probably the most corrupt individual in Washington. And Obama wanted to make him Secy of Treasury.
And the only reason he didn't was his fellow Democrats threw a fit about it.
But, I don't expect you even know who he is.
And what about Robert Rubin? KNow who that is?? Of course you don't... not without Google.
What is his role in the mortgage crises?
No graphs to show that?
Gutter boy?

LOL

I happen to know for a fact from a lil birdy that my Economic situation is quite a bit more comfortable than yours is. Or was, when I knew :lol:

Pump the brakes on your economic conspiracy theory hole, dork - I've had enough of your boring ass....every response is fingers in your ears like a fuggin 4 year old moron. Time for better things to do.
My economic condition?
Haha... and once again, there you go again. Into the gutter where you are the most comfortable.
You have absolutely exactly zero idea of my net worth. None. Equally I have no idea of yours, so don't pretend you know anything gutter boy.
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
76,009
Reaction score
11,382
Points
2,030
G.T.
Here is another one for you gutter boy.... you know who Larry Summers is?
I seriously fucking doubt it. So go ahead... Google him.
Obama wanted to make him Secy of the Treasury and used him in three different economic advisory roles, including chairman.
Larry fucking Summers.
Probably the most corrupt individual in Washington. And Obama wanted to make him Secy of Treasury.
And the only reason he didn't was his fellow Democrats threw a fit about it.
But, I don't expect you even know who he is.
And what about Robert Rubin? KNow who that is?? Of course you don't... not without Google.
What is his role in the mortgage crises?
No graphs to show that?
Gutter boy?

LOL

I happen to know for a fact from a lil birdy that my Economic situation is quite a bit more comfortable than yours is. Or was, when I knew :lol:

Pump the brakes on your economic conspiracy theory hole, dork - I've had enough of your boring ass....every response is fingers in your ears like a fuggin 4 year old moron. Time for better things to do.
My economic condition?
Haha... and once again, there you go again. Into the gutter where you are the most comfortable.
You have absolutely exactly zero idea of my net worth. None. Equally I have no idea of yours, so don't pretend you know anything gutter boy.
That's a nice rainbow, and all - hope you feel better and you can thank Obama for that 2009 and forward growth that you had, apparently

Biden 2020, Make IAM's investments great again! lol
 

ninja007

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
6,640
Reaction score
1,307
Points
255
Location
Living rent free in libs heads
Choice B is who is running against Trump.
Biden doesn't matter. No one in their right mind could get excited about a man who has been a Washington insider for 47 years, obviously senile and falling fast.
Biden will not win... it will be a Harris Presidency eventually when they just can't hide the fact he is a mere shadow of his former self. We are all going to age. we are all going to become senile and confused easily. It is a part of the human existence.

we arent running for the potus.
 

ninja007

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
6,640
Reaction score
1,307
Points
255
Location
Living rent free in libs heads
biden hasn't gotten covid
SO WHAT, bitch? Leaders all over the world have picked it up including persons within Harris' party. Trump can't be sitting in his basement wearing a mask hiding 24/7 like Joe. If he did, then you'd claim he was unfit for or unable to carry out his duties. Either way, you try to create these puerile lose-lose situations for Trump like you think we are all idiots.

The real point is that very few people ever actually get seriously ill over it. ANY OTHER TIME, an illness like Trump and others have gotten probably wouldn't be enough for most people to justify calling off from work for or be excused from.

World pandemic my ass.
Well, to be fair if you're Voting for Trump then you're in one sense indeed an idiot.

Better to have Gomer Pyle running the country than Genghis Khan.
If Biden is Genghis Khan, then why did the stock market, jobs and GDP get left to Trump on a steady, years long upswing? Why was unemployment already plummeting when Trump took office if the O'Biden ethos is so bad for Business?

Just because daddy cult leader sucks up all the credit, doesnt change the data.

Facts. Data. Facts, data. You are susceptible to propaganda. You and your fellow cultists have been ENGINEERED like little sheep to think that Democrats mean the world will end, but in reality, they've been stronger for the Economy for the last almost half a dozen Presidents. Question is...why do you enjoy being lied to...when you can just use opinion-free data to see if your dickless media are full of shit, or not??? (thats rhetorical)

View attachment 408243

View attachment 408244

View attachment 408245



View attachment 408246

slowest economic recovery EVER under Barry, most on unemployment, food stamps etc.
 

Roudy

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
50,528
Reaction score
8,823
Points
2,030
Biden is like one of these supernatural beings...you never know when, where and how he will appear.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top